Originally posted by ScreamPaste
The trolling is your little crusade all over the forum against characters you know nothing about for some stupid bias and ruining threads as a result.
This is trolling understand? getting angry because your wrong is one thing, attackin me is another, this is what starts trolling.
Ofc for once I will not take the bait and will leave you stranded and ignore your musings, Ill keep to the facts of LoZ thank you.
This is trolling understand? getting angry because your wrong is one thing, attackin me is another, this is what starts trolling.
Ofc for once I will not take the bait and will leave you stranded and ignore your musings, Ill keep to the facts of LoZ thank you.This is trolling. Pretending you're right when all facts point otherwise, trolling. Pretending to be the arbiter of canon of a game you have no played to annoy people, trolling. Following a character to every thread they're in to annoy the people who actually know about him, trolling.
Calling you on your crap is not an attack, it's exactly what it is, telling you, that you, are, a, troll.
Originally posted by BloodRain
Ganons different forms cant use the same feats; TP Ganon can be knocked out or stunned by normal arrows, Ball and chain and even by being thrown to the ground. And damages by the MS and WolfLinks bites. All different to Dorf. In this instance can we really say Dorf survived the blast when he was in his dark magic ball form?
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
BT also seems to think Link's just some random child, his opinions can be wholly disregarded in Zelda debates, because that's what they are: biased opinions.Anyway; on topic.
The thing is, people keep [b]inventing
new possibilities as evidence that "we don't know what happen!!1", except all of their examples are far less likely to have happened than what we see happen directly in the cutscene itself, and the intention of the cutscene.Fact 1. Only attack that happened came from Midna.
Fact 2. Ganon was the target.
Fact 3. Ganon was present when this attack occured.
Fact 4. The castle exploded as the result of an attack.
Fact 5. We only have one attack to work with, it was Midna's.
Fact 6. Ganon was present when Midna's attack targettign him busted a freakin' castle.^Cutscene.
There is no other valid logical conclusion. [/B]
Ganondorf charge towards Midna may have been an attack and a chain reaction led to the castle's explosion.
Facts 1,4, and 5 are opinions.
How are 1, 4, and 5 opinions? Your entire basis for saying Ganon doesn't have this feat is that "we don't see it, it didn't happen" but you want to say things like Ganon probably counterattacked or he's intangible.
Let's make the most logical conclusion based on what we see, according to your ideas. If we don't see it, it didn't happen.
Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Let's make the most logical conclusion based on what we see, according to your ideas. If we don't see it, it didn't happen.
If I told you Ganondorf was beaten by Navi and he had a heart attack and you never got to see a fight but you see Navi floating over his body ramming into him would you believe that?
Originally posted by Sin_Volvagia
Facts 1,4, and 5 are opinions.
Actually, facts 1, 4 and 5 are facts indeed, based on the information that was available watching the cutscene. To assume anything more than what we saw is just that, an assumption. So, until you can prove this assumption, it is nothing but garbage.