Originally posted by OneDumbG0 you still cannot distinguish Magus wtfpwning a tiny nullification sphere
and Ironman wtfpwning the Star Gem[/u].
Magus wtfpwnd the same energies that nullify space-time. Simple.
You call it a 'tiny" null sphere, but actually, in the Quasar book interpretation,
the sphere expands to smother the space between Quasar & Magus including Magus' stronghold,
which then Magus pwns the UN space-time nullifying energies with but a thought.
I don't recall the specifics of the Irona Man incident, (I'll have to flip some pages)
did Iron Man overpower the Star Gem with his rays, or did he just blast the gem itself?
That aside, Thanos erased Death across an entire Universe,
and the nullification sphere was the size of a human female.
So this circle speculating the UN needs to adjust in power to do its work is unfounded.
Also,
Galactus (616) used a uni beam the size of cyclops' normal optic blast
to erase Korvac from existence, and while Korvac escaped nullification by bfring himself
it goes to show that the UN can stomp Universal powers without the need of a cosmic sized sphere.
(616 Korvac using his power cloaked his presence from Eternity & LT
and he even made subtle alterations to the 616 Reality)
That also aside,
the fact remains that the UN only needed to rub out Abraxas to remake Eternity/Infinity to its prior self.
I mean what was it Reed said? "to realign all that is, we had to end all that was"
and 'what was'? ... Abraxas collapsing the Multiverse,
therefore Abraxas should've been the target.
Yea Reed stated that Abraxas could collapse all the Realities with the UN,
but Reed never said he himself could, let's not forget that Abraxas is a cosmic being, with cosmic senses,
while Reed is a not, just like you yourself argued Reed did not contain a map of every atom in reality.
Bottom line, by erasing Abraxas from ever having been freed, automatically realigns what was not right, and what was not right was that Galactus 'died',
which inturn lead to Abraxas fulfilling his conceptual purpose which is to collapse the Multiverse,
if Abraxas had never been freed, then Galactus could have never died.
"to realign all that is, we had to end all that was"
With a single miniscule basically insigficant difference: Sue is pregnant.
Yea I know I was the one that brought to kmc the UNremaking the Multiverse,
but this on going circle has had me thinking outside the box.
Just an observation to consider.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0 1. UN was said to have no limits either.
So my no limit fallacy still beats yours.
When/where has it been said that the UN has no limit?
Because I have an issue where its literally stated that the UN does infact have a limit,
and this was from the mouth of Galactus.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0 2. The Gems obviously had their limits. Maelstrom, Grandmaster, LT, etc.
Maelstrom? Thanos in his infancy wielding stage, blasted him once and nothing more,
Maelstrom himself point out how Thanos' inexperience with the IG was a plus,
and Maelstrom also stated that the IG surpassed his power.
Grandmaster? ... What? vs Loki who was being manipulated by the Gems themselves? 😬
LT? Who came as a representative of TOAA's power? Please, let's not go there.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0 I need to prove that nullifying a tiny marble is a less powerful feat than nullifying AND RECREATING the entire Marvel Multiverse? Why would I need to prove that? It's obvious. And nobody argues against it. Nobody has said anything stupid like:
"[b]I'm [insert name], and I believe that nullifying a marble is as powerful a feat as nullifying AND RECREATING the entire Marvel Multiverse instantly."
facepalm