HOM Wanda vs. Thanos w/ IG

You are equating size with power,
because you're under the impression that the nullification sphere Quasar controlled
is somehow weaker than the sphere Reed used due to size difference.
Even though they both result in the SAME exact freakin end,
that is the target is erased from existence.

Quasar only limited the amount of area he was going to nullify,
but this amount was to be nullified by the SAME damn energies that nullify any amount
no matter the size.

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ Why are you pretending to argue with me? UN accomplished something exponentially more powerful than the IG ever has. On-panel. You won't even say that the UN could match it. You won't even state why Magus wtfpwning tiny nullification sphere is distinguishable from Ironman wtfpwning Star Gem.

And how many people have called you a terrible debator? Do you really want to pull the 'ole appeal to the masses fallacy?

It was stated it doesn't matter it only matters as the ig can manipulate the energies with a thought. They can be the size of an anthill or Arizona it doesn't matter. To you size is everything. It's like you just don't grasp things most debaters have years ago.

I bet most of the people who have called me a terrible debater do so because they have something against me and I bet like you just did right here spelled it with an o instead of an e. It's spelled debater.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Let's count them. There's Mr Master, you, Kurupt Thanosi...and that's it. Against...pretty much the rest of the forum. 😬

Plus its not like having the most supporters makes something right.

I bet most of the people who have called me a terrible debater do so because they have something against me and I bet like you just did right here spelled it with an o instead of an e. It's spelled debater.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Quan...a lot of people have a lot of stuff against you but you are right.In this argument you are more right than ODG.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Quan...a lot of people have a lot of stuff against you but you are right.In this argument you are more right than ODG.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I'm very lovable though.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
What parts are correct?

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Like an autistic teddy bear. ✅

Originally posted by quanchi112
It's plain to see if you follow along in the thread. If you have to ask then it kinda shows you really haven't followed the debate.

Originally posted by quanchi112
There's that I hate quan streak flaring up again.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Oh I've followed your string of fails quite closely. I'm just curious where BB sees good, well thought points.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
What do you expect from the Anti-Quanitor? sneer

Originally posted by Omega Vision
What parts are correct?

Originally posted by quanchi112
I'm very lovable though.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Like an autistic teddy bear. ✅

Originally posted by quanchi112
You can see him around 5-9 posts ago agreeing with points making it painfully obvious what he agrees with. That's trick. If he comes back you guys can bond over similar hatred for me.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
He's kind of switched back and forth bewteen random things...but mostly the part about that the energy level doesn't change.Only the scope does.Multiple people have said this. I want you now(no homo) ummm...odd comparison much?

Originally posted by quanchi112
So I am not right about the ig being more powerful than the un which this argument grew from initially?

Originally posted by Black bolt z
More powerful...no.Able to be used in a more wide variety of ways giving it a distinct advantage over UN...yes.
Omega i'll debate with you when I get back.My brother wants his turn on the computer.21 min.

Originally posted by quanchi112
How is the ig not more powerful than the un?

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Well it destroyed and recreated the multiverse and it might be able to do more.I doubt IG could do that.But as I said IG has advantages like versatility over UN.Thats how it wins.Not pure force.

Originally posted by quanchi112
So you really don't know whether the ig could so and are just basing it off of an impressive feat.

This thread is ridiculous. Obviously nullifying an infinite amount of infinite universes, nigh-instantly would require FAR more energy output then nullifying a 1" x 1" square of space.

...I'm not too blinded by my own bias to see that.