Godzilla (2014)

Started by Mindship35 pages

Originally posted by Lestov16
Between this and Pacific Rim, giant monster heaven, baby!
Imagine if this took off the way superhero flicks did. All the 1950s/60s movies just waiting for a remake: Rodan, Gorgo, Them, and the very first of the atomic monsters: the Beast from 20,000 fathoms.

Let the daikaiju renaissance begin!

Seems Godzilla will have a fight with that giant spider or something similar to Kumonga. Among some others that have yet to be announced

http://godzilla.wikia.com/wiki/Kumonga

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/notyetamovie/news/?a=88839

Everything looks great, Been waiting on this for so long.

.

Probably said it before but will say it again...

PLEASE PLEASE PLESE DON'T MATTHEW BRODERICK THIS UP PLEEEEAAASSSEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!

I think they wanna do a sequel/remake of destroy all monsters after this new Godzilla movie

Haha @ Flyattractor.

Originally posted by Flyattractor
[b]Probably said it before but will say it again...

PLEASE PLEASE PLESE DON'T MATTHEW BRODERICK THIS UP PLEEEEAAASSSEEEE!!!!!!!!!!! [/B]

Worse thing about the 98 version IMO was the terrible CGI. A nerdy scientist saying "That's a lot of fish", I can take with no problem. Godzilla being represented by special effects that look like they're from a Nintendo 64 game, no so much.

Originally posted by Lestov16
Worse thing about the 98 version IMO was the terrible CGI. A nerdy scientist saying "That's a lot of fish", I can take with no problem. Godzilla being represented by special effects that look like they're from a Nintendo 64 game, no so much.

I get what your trying to get at there but your exaggerating things

the special effects for that Godzilla looked nothing like they're from a N64 game.

Okay, they weren't that bad. But they were still terrible. The Godzilla from the Doritos commercials looked more realistic.

Eh it was okay i've seen worst CGI, The Scorpion King in Mummy Returns.

I won't say it was the worst CGI ever, but we're talking about Godzilla here. He deserved the best CGI money could afford. It's not like they didn't have the technology at the time because the T-Rex from Jurassic Park looked massively more realistic and it came out roughly 5 years prior.

Wasn't it also a mixture of animaltronic's & CGI with the T-Rex and also including all the other dino's.

Yes it was. They could have used those same methods here.

Godzilla from Godzilla, Mothra, and King Ghidorah: Giant Monsters All Out Attack! was not only perhaps the best rubber suit Godzilla, but there were some swimming scenes where he was CGI, and it looked great.

Enough with the rubber suit. Like Superman's outside-underwear, this is a "tradition" that needs to go.

Originally posted by Mindship

Enough with the rubber suit. Like Superman's outside-underwear, this is a "tradition" that needs to go.

Pacific Rim has proven that

don't need rubber suits anymore.

👆

With today's amazing special effects, rubber suits are obsolete.

Originally posted by Lestov16

With today's amazing special effects, rubber suits are obsolete.

Well Cameron proved rubber suits to be still effective in a big budget movie like Aliens.
I would personally hate to see cgi killing off miniature models & animatronic creatures.

Actors reacting to a guy in a "rubber suit" is always more convincing to watch.

Originally posted by Esau Cairn
Well Cameron proved rubber suits to be still effective in a big budget movie like Aliens.

And when was that 1986...yes it looked good for that time but technology has gotten better.

Originally posted by Kazenji
And when was that 1986...yes it looked good for that time but technology has gotten better.

Yeah but those effects still hold up today. I don't think the Hulk should be conveyed on film in a practical manner but I do think that more filmmakers should use practical effects much more than they do. Just as CGI has improved, so has animatronics and make-up. When you combine CGI with practical effects properly you get can get something that looks amazing. Look at Pans labyrinth and hellboy.