Originally posted by ScreamPaste
No. Your governemtn nuked Japan, twice, that is an evil act, especially after the first one sent such a clear message. This is like me kicking over your garden gnomes, and you blowing up my house.
Originally posted by MooCowofJusticewe do.
"**** politics" should be something we all agree on.
Originally posted by ares834America was winning, the first nuke probably was unnecessary, the second was total overkill. 😐
Not really. It was war. And it was either them or us. I don't think nukeing Japan was a good act, nor was it evil. It was necessary to preserve the life of our citizens and soildiers.
Originally posted by ScreamPasteThe even after the first one was launch Japan still didn't surrender. I like how canada can judge one a war they took little to no part in. Japan was raping Phillipines and Chinese women. I appreciate you do not go further into this discussing as my great grand father believe to be right.
No. Your governemtn nuked Japan, twice, that is an evil act, especially after the first one sent such a clear message. This is like me kicking over your garden gnomes, and you blowing up my house.
Originally posted by PhanterosLittle to no part in? O rly? And where did you read that? We were on the Japanese front, too, and we fought very hard against Germany, so what the ****?
The even after the first one was launch Japan still didn't surrender. I like how canada can judge one a war they took little to no part in. Japan was raping Phillipines and Chinese women. I appreciate you do not go further into this discussing as my great grand father believe to be right.
And yes, they did. I r haz history buk, you see? The second bomb was totally unnecessary.
Edit: no, really, what the FVCK?
Originally posted by ScreamPasteWell I sorry if I offend you like you offended me. But this discussion needs to end because its off topic and resulting to an unnecessary flame war.
Little to no part in? O rly? And where did you read that? We were on the Japanese front, too, and we fought very hard against Germany, so what the ****?And yes, they did. I r haz history buk, you see? The second bomb was totally unnecessary.
Edit: no, really, what the FVCK?
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
America was winning, the first nuke probably was unnecessary, the second was total overkill. 😐
Originally posted by PhanterosWhat irks me is how common that misconception is. Do you know what the population of Canada was back then? Less than thirty million. We sent over more than a million soldiers, did excellently on D-Day, and had to stop and wait for the American forces to catch up on the way through Italy. Large numbers of Canadians ended up in Japanese PoW camps because we were indeed fighting on that front. I'm still against the second bombing. There's a difference between holding a negative opinion over the actions of a government and totally denying a nation's involvement. 😐
Well I sorry if I offend you like you offended me. But this discussion needs to end because its off topic and resulting to an unnecessary flame war.
But yeah, this does need to stop.
Originally posted by ScreamPaste
What irks me is how common that misconception is. Do you know what the population of Canada was back then? Less than thirty million. We sent over more than a million soldiers, did excellently on D-Day, and had to stop and wait for the American forces to catch up on the way through Italy. Large numbers of Canadians ended up in Japanese PoW camps because we were indeed fighting on that front. I'm still against the second bombing. There's a difference between holding a negative opinion over the actions of a government and totally denying a nation's involvement. 😐But yeah, this does need to stop.
Originally posted by Ms.MarvelIs this you trying to calm me down. 😛
no.