Bayonetta, Kratos, and Sephiroth vs. Link and Sheik (SSBB)

Started by BloodRain44 pages

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
1. You're using dramatic effects like it's some requisite for speed now. 😐 Not every "dramatic effect" is as blatantly obvious as a matrix esque stop and spin.

Also, speed ran = speed dodging? No. We clearly see Link in one place, then move, than a laser hit where he was.

2. Friction in fiction doesn't work like friction in real life, try again. Bullets = slow as arrows.
It's still impossible for a laser to move as slowly as a bullet, if things in fiction work at all similarly. If they do, laser is faster, and bullet is bullet speed, if not, bullet is slow as an arrow, or slower.

Can go on like that.

2/2 slain.


Tactics are very similar to how BT used to avoid proof and the answer (no offence to you or BT ^^;; )
Saw the bullet, and it had shockwave/heat that isnt present in anything below mach speeds ._. If it was really 2 seconds the bullet would not have the speed to hit the target.

Not talking about the dodge. The movement of the cracks show that the scene was running at normal speed. So everything in that scene was at the speed it was show, which includes the lasers.

Arrows dont go at mach speed thus cannot show the signs of mach speed unlike the bullet.

And its also impossible for a laser to be at the speeds in that scene. Only other option is that its the same as all other laser guns and does not go at real life laser speed.

Should go by what GK said and prove that the lasers are as fast as real lasers without saying it has to be because of real life. (especially as we dont have laser guns)

You're always one to use proof, why not now?

Tactics are very similar to how BT used to avoid proof and the answer (no offence to you or BT ^^;; )
Plenty of offense to me.

Saw the bullet, and it had shockwave/heat that isnt present in anything below mach speeds ._. If it was really 2 seconds the bullet would not have the speed to hit the target.
You're missing the entire point. LEMME LAY IT OUT FOR YOU.

Your argument hinges on things in fiction not working how they work in real life. If this is so, you have no argumetn for bullets, because you've essentially just broken everything. That way lies Nihilism, as I said.

Also, they were infact running very quickly, so I'm not sure what your point is?

Yes, we can see the lasers, but we need to be able to see them to know they're there and Mario and Link aren't just dancing like retards. It would be totally impossible to design a laser that shoots as slowly as you suggest, but that's okay, because it's fiction so it automaticly is as slow as you suggest? NO, SIR! By that very logic, I can do the same to bullets, friction ,and anything. 😐 Because it's fiction.

So yeah, I have a cutscene, shows Link dodging lasers.
-A slow laser is impossible.
-A bullet achieving visible heat from air resistance below mach 1 is impossible.

^Would go together, but so would
-Lasers are slow because we can see them
-Bullets are slow because they take time to hit their target.

One or the other.

Originally posted by Nephthys
Tis thread is now the epitomy of ugh3.

Moo, were you being thick on purpose? Becuase Charizard does not fly around the earth. He flies in a small consentric circle. 😐 Without being rude..... that was a really retarded thing to say. I assume you were serious becuase you said it like 3 times btw.

Scream, both times you mentioned the camera is moving at the same speed as the the object, so its visible. Speed-based invisibility occurs when our eyes are just too slow to pick someting up, but if our 'eye' (the camera) is moving at the same speed, that is not a problem. Thats the Bayonetta thing. With the sniper the perspective is clearly slowed down for dramatic effect, stopping when it hits Edeas shield and returning to real time, as indicated by the bullet flying off at speeds we can't see. Furthermore, every other time we see a gun in the game, the bullets are too fast to be seen.

Also, Charizard didn't fly into space. Also, prove that poke-earth's ozone layer is as high-up as ours. Also, you did not prove they were lasers. 😐

It was a post to show the stupidity of Bayonetta punching someone at "faster than light speeds."

So why did Keollyn say Charizard was lame and start posting pics of shemales?

Ah, good. I thought you were better than that.

btw, am I on ignore, Scream?

edit2: 'A slow laser is impossible.'

Why?

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice

So why did Keollyn say Charizard was lame and start posting pics of shemales?

Lmao. That was funny.

Pretty sure you posted a shemale too, Spinda.

link-rape

Originally posted by ScreamPaste
Plenty of offense to me.

You're missing the entire point. LEMME LAY IT OUT FOR YOU.

Your argument hinges on things in fiction not working how they work in real life. If this is so, you have no argumetn for bullets, because you've essentially just broken everything. That way lies Nihilism, as I said.

Also, they were infact running very quickly, so I'm not sure what your point is?

Yes, we can see the lasers, but we need to be able to see them to know they're there and Mario and Link aren't just dancing like retards. It would be totally impossible to design a laser that shoots as slowly as you suggest, but that's okay, because it's fiction so it automaticly is as slow as you suggest? NO, SIR! By that very logic, I can do the same to bullets, friction ,and anything. 😐 Because it's fiction.

So yeah, I have a cutscene, shows Link dodging lasers.
-A slow laser is impossible.
-A bullet achieving visible heat from air resistance below mach 1 is impossible.

^Would go together, but so would
-Lasers are slow because we can see them
-Bullets are slow because they take time to hit their target.

One or the other.

I take it back then, but its still similar. Reason being the last thing I say v

Never said things in fiction dont work the same as in real life, near the opposite. In the scene a bullet is fired from a gun; we know how this works irl. In the scene lasers are shot out; we dont know how this works as we dont have laser guns irl. What we do know is that laser guns are used in other media where they are not at real lasers speeds.

Point is that lets say they were running at 10m/s we can use that as a base to see how fast the lasers were going by comparison. In this case not at real lasers speeds.

If they wanted real lasers they can easily of made them faster and function like real lasers. Good lil webbie http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raygun where 'laser' is referred to 42 times. Mainly the 'function' part. Fiction laser guns are not as fast as real lasers.

Lets see, first one, second one, or my one that is has facts on it? Gonna have to go for the latter.
-Lasers are slow because we can see them based off the speed of the scene and that we have no real laser guns to base it off
-A bullet achieving visible heat from air resistance below mach 1 is impossible. as we do have guns to prove this
Have to ask again for the 3rd or somethingth time for you to prove that those particular lasers move at real laser speeds even if the speed of that scene and other laser guns in media's say otherwise.

http://bigwords88.files.wordpress.com/2009/12/pokemon-must-die.jpg

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
It was a post to show the stupidity of Bayonetta punching someone at "faster than light speeds."

So why did Keollyn say Charizard was lame and start posting pics of shemales?

Because Charlizzie is lame and if you think a guy with long hair is a shemale then the sex of a lot of anime/manga/video game characters are oblivious to you.

Actually, it just looked like a shemale.

Do you see the genitals?

Or are you projecting?

Thsi thead sucks ass. (no ofeense to spartan) Allow me to impriove it greatly.

I didn't look for genitals in the image.

Seems like you were.

Wait, are you telling me that was a female? 😆

What the hell are you talking about?

I'm just curious as to how the confusion went from female to shemale. The only way someone can confuse an animated drawing of a character for a shemale is if they were looking at their genitals.

Shemale is just something I say when I can't tell the actual gender. Probably not the same definition you had.

So legit, is it a male or female? I can't tell.