Originally posted by TacDavey
I'm the one who doesn't know how logic works huh? That's rich, coming from the dude who claims the FF parties strength can't be AT ALL known. How do you tell anyone else's strength? If Cloud beat Yuffie, it would be logical to say Cloud is stronger than Yuffie. So if the collective FF 9 team beat Kuja, we can say that the collective FF9 team is stronger than Kuja. THAT'S logic. I'll tell you what ISN'T logic, though.Beatrix looses cause she has no feats.
I'm really digging the big headedness your sporting though. Makes it all the more humorous that you're so ridiculously illogical. But I guess those two things usually come in pairs don't they?
1. You said the FF characters don't have feats. FF7, according to you, does because they have Advent Children. AND according to you. If there are no feats, they cannot be used. Thus, if you need things like AC to have feats, and no old school FF game has AC like action, the old school FF games don't have feats. Am I right? And no feats means no thread use.
2. Ah, and you are supposed to be so brilliant in logic? Tell me you aren't saying the FF party is weaker than Cloud because we don't have anything that shows them stronger. That's a fallacy, NemeBro.
I never said Beatrix was stronger than Cloud. In fact, I think Cloud would win. The difference is I actually have good reasons to think Cloud would win, not "Beatrix has no feats, thus Cloud wins." That is one of the worst arguments I have ever heard, and I'm ashamed that it came from someone supporting my side.
3. But how do we know Cloud isn't burning orange nipple Jesus? We use common sense. So, unless there is reason to think that anything is different between FF9 and FF7, and I'd like to hear if there is, we can logically assume that there isn't.
4. I'm not butthurt, but I'm allergic to irrationality and you are heavy with the stuff. I see no reason Beatrix and the party can't be among the people we can quantify. If Beatrix beats Zidane, she's stronger than Zidane. That's not that hard. So if the FF9 party beats Kuja, they are collectively stronger than him. It's logic. What is the difference between Kuja and Beatrix?
5. I know, right? I've only been hear two months and I'm already better at this than you!
6. It's anything but.
Discounting beating the main villains, quantify their strength for me please. A>B>C logic is generally not a good way to quantify the abilities of a character. Yes, if Cloud beat Yuffie, it would be logical to say he could. We really can't when you consider that Kuja easily blew them all away when he used his best attack, the one that he refused to use for the entire fight, in a fight where we do not know what happened. Maybe Trance Kuja lost because he is very slow in comparison? Maybe he lost because he was too overconfident? Or maybe it was what most FF villain battles are and it was PIS? Using your A>B>C logic and completely ignoring everything else, the FFV, FFIX, FFVIII, and FFIII parties are all universal in power because they beat universal characters. FF is practically built on PIS.
Stop strawmanning my argument, it is not just that she has no feats, we cannot even powerscale her abilities.
Big headedness? Oh dear no, when one considers the incredible vastness of my intellect, I am being quite modest. 🙂
1. They generally don't, most FF characters do not. Yes, because of AC, we were given a more clear idea of the capabilities of the party. Once again, stop strawmanning my argument. An individual character does not necessarily need feats, if Zidane and the party were confirmed bullet-timers for instance, we could safely assume that Beatrix is a bullet-timer as well, and is in fact faster than the party so could do it with less effort. "Things" like AC? Not every FF character from one of the older games lacks feats, I already ****ing brought up some that did. Thing is, you still have failed to quantify the statistical abilities of the FFIX party, so you are just arguing out of your ass at this point, prove up or shut up.
2. I am very well aware it is, and am also aware that I am not technically using it. That would be an argument from ignorance, stating that because it has not been proven true, it must be false. I am saying that because they have yet to prove they are stronger than Cloud, it is safer to assume they are not. Kind of like how it is safer to assume that some random guy off of the street would not be able to beat Mike Tyson in a boxing match because he has nothing to prove he could.
Then please tell me why you think Cloud would win? Is it based on his blonde emo hair? Or maybe because his sword is bigger? Ooooooh wait no, it must be because his shirt only has one sleeve! I think Cloud would probably win because based on everything we know, Cloud is more impressive, Beatrix may be an FTL Multiverse buster who can fire radioactive breast-milk, but she has not proven to be one yet, she has not proven to be near Cloud's level, nor have the people she has beaten.
3. Well the most pressing difference seems to be that FFVII is far more technologically advanced than FFIX is and the only reason people like Cloud exist is due to genetic super-soldier programs using the DNA of a nigh-godlike being. 🙂 Why would I assume they are the same? They are different universes, connected only by being made by the same company and with a few of the series' trademarks, are you implying all FF verses are the same? You would have to prove such a statement, I do not need to prove they are not, the burden of proof is in fact on you.
4. Then stfu and DO SO. If you can quantify them, be my guest. She was stronger than Zidane, the party that fought Kuja then had not fought Beatrix in a while. Are you implying Beatrix<Kuja? Funny, Queen Brahne did not think so, which was a sore point for Beatrix, having to take a backseat to Kuja and his Black Mages. The difference is one is the final boss (Not counting Necron), which are nearly always PIS. Or can the FFIX party perform universal feats and survive such attacks? Necron was a universe ender.
5. Funny, because based on what I have seen, you would not have been a match for me a year ago. You have been repeating the same illogical argument this entire thread.
6. Anything but spectacularly amazing? Agreed.