Robocop v. Wolverine

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
T-800: Tanked a point blank grenade blast from Reese. Tanked a truck explosion. Took a hydraulic press to do him in.

T-850: Tanked a TX energy blast to the chest. Connor's woman shot it in the face, it spit out the bullet and said "Don't do that."

T-1000: Will regen from anything Robo throws at him. Could even morph into Nancy Allen, fool Robo, then shove a blade through his head.

TX: Laughable. She'll corrupt Robo and turn him on the Detroit PD.

Movie Robo against any T model.......Dead Robo.

Na, dude, Robocop shots a T-800 in the eyes with pinpoint accuracy, crushes its head while it flails about blindly, gets in his Ford Taurus and drives off.

Originally posted by roughrider
Wolverine dodges, weaves,

Originally posted by Robtard
Na, dude, Robocop shots a T-800 in the eyes with pinpoint accuracy, crushes its head while it flails about blindly, gets in his Ford Taurus and drives off.

There's a difference in wanting Robo to win and proving he can win.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I have proven that it takes Robo six seconds to draw and aim, but it's being ignored.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Hard to do when Robo's head is spinning around in the floor. I have proven that it takes Robo six seconds to draw and aim, but it's being ignored.

There's a difference in wanting Robo to win and proving he can win.

Isn't it the most baffling thing when you prove something and happen to be ignored by someone who just WANTS to believe they're right?

You do this so often.

Not suggesting you're in that position now, but if you would complain about it, I'd suggest to stop doing it to everyone else.

-AC

the x men wolverine gets knocked out by robocop... the origin wolverine rape stomps robocop.

even in the movies they made wolverine inconsistent

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
Isn't it the most baffling thing when you prove something and happen to be ignored by someone who just WANTS to believe they're right?

You do this so often.

Not suggesting you're in that position now, but if you would complain about it, I'd suggest to stop doing it to everyone else.

-AC

If we are discussing Joe versus Jake and someone posts a vid with visual evidence of a certain something about who I am arguing for, as I did with Robo, then I acknowledge it.

I guess you're referring to something like SS versus Bee. I already explained why I think SS wins. I was never convinced Bee would win. Now, if I knew in my mind Bee would win but keep arguing against it, then yeah, I am guilty of what you are implying.

And please let's not rehash SS and Bee, I was just using it as an example.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
There's a difference in wanting to be right and not being convinced that you are wrong. If I am convinced I am wrong I fess up. Han Solo versus Kirk, perfect example of me getting pwned, and I admitted it.

If we are discussing Joe versus Jake and someone posts a vid with visual evidence of a certain something about who I am arguing for, as I did with Robo, then I acknowledge it.

I guess you're referring to something like SS versus Bee. I already explained why I think SS wins. I was never convinced Bee would win. Now, if I knew in my mind Bee would win but keep arguing against it, then yeah, I am guilty of what you are implying.

And please let's not rehash SS and Bee, I was just using it as an example.

You were never convinced despite facts, evidence and forum rules curbstomping your argument. You chose to go with: "I still think he'd win.". It's not even an S Vs Bee thing. It's just something I've seen you do a lot.

My point is that maybe you shouldn't be so quick to complain when far less ignorant posts are directed at you. It's not productive.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
You were never convinced despite facts, evidence and forum rules curbstomping your argument. You chose to go with: "I still think he'd win.". It's not even an S Vs Bee thing. It's just something I've seen you do a lot.

My point is that maybe you shouldn't be so quick to complain when far less ignorant posts are directed at you. It's not productive.

-AC

You want facts and evidence? Look at the 501st/Hogwarts thread. I povided facts and evidence, the argument against me was all opinionated.

Facts? Voldemort can go invisible and cast Fiendfyre. Fact: Clones cannot see invisible things. Fact: The Fiendfyre would overwhelm and consume the Clones.

Fact: Voldemort solos the clones.

Want more? OK, the thread where the uber HP wizards invade the Jedi temple. Fact: Death Eaters can fly around hundreds of feet in the air and cast Fiendfyre as they go. Fact: The wizards can oppugno the Coruscant citizens and have then attack the temple. Fact: The wizards can do the same to the clones.

I presented all these facts/evidence, and they were ignored. Point is that what you say I tend to do, has been done to me far more than I have done.

I am not trying to rehash age old arguments, apologies to Impediment for going off topic, but it was to prove a point.

Anyone who does it is retarded, it's not a pop at you solely and apologies if it seemed that way. It wasn't my intention, sorry for that.

I'm just saying, you do it. You haven't stopped doing it.

-AC

We all do it, at least it looks like we all do it.

If someone TRULY believes that their guy wins, then they aren't doing it. When I am arguing that my guy wins, it is because I have not been convinced he will lose.

YouTube video

Robocop is hardcore!

In the comic Terminators were sent back in time to protect Robocop for his technology was pivitol to Terminator tech. A warrior human was sent back to destroy him. But they ended up joining sides and fought the group of Terminators instead.

Movie wise Wolvey in the Xmen films sucked and couldn't take a bullet to the noggin without getting knocked out. Origins showed my class but the damage is done.......especially since the Xmen films are based after Origins!!!! 😉

Oh my...

I have a funny feeling this thread will go down in the Movie Versus Forum Hall of Fame...

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Hard to do when Robo's head is spinning around in the floor. I have proven that it takes Robo six seconds to draw and aim, but it's being ignored.

There's a difference in wanting Robo to win and proving he can win.

You did not.

I posted a clip from Robocop, timer is 2-3 seconds from the time his leg opens and the gun is in his hand pointed forward. It's there for all to see, page 12.

Considering the above, I'd say the "my favorite HAS to win" syndrome is on you.

OK,I'll give you your three seconds. Wolvie can cover at least 60 to 70 feet in three seconds.

Your turn.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Because he lacks the speed and power? And the durability? Because any version of a terminator would tear him to pieces? Except for the crappy ones from the beginning of Salvation.

9mm rounds against a terminator?

HA.

Wrong. His jetpack gives him amazing speed. Look at the end of Robocop 3.

His power is only questioned by people that didnt see him shift a couple of tonnes of girders off of him (AFTER surviving them being dropped for like 20 ft above him) in the 1st movie...Throwing Boddicker around like he was made of paper, Throwing that big dude from the store robbery like he was a rag doll....punching through walls etc... No to mention fighting Robocop 2 H2H etc.

And what are normal 9mm rounds against Robocop...? Look at that liquor store scene in more detail. And the Coke factory.
The OCP cops used special jacketted armour piercing rounds.
They'd probably do damage to a T-800.

Any your any version of a terminator tearing him to pieces is pure speculation on your part.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
I think Wei meant that Robo is too slow, that Wolvie can weave in and out and avoid his aim.

In which case hes totally unfamiliar with the Robocop movies, if that was his assertion.

And I'd also have to say that he totally overates Wolverine's bullet dodging capabilities. Especially with the auto 9 on full auto.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Hard to do when Robo's head is spinning around in the floor. I have proven that it takes Robo six seconds to draw and aim, but it's being ignored.

There's a difference in wanting Robo to win and proving he can win.

No you havent. At all.... Thats why it was blatantly, deservedly, universally ignored.

There a difference in wanting Wolverine to have abilities way beyond his actual on screen ones, and that being so.

Your attempted Murph draw time gimping was sadly expected.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
OK,I'll give you your three seconds. Wolvie can cover at least 60 to 70 feet in three seconds.

Your turn.

Im jesus and can fly and I poop rainbows.

Yours again.