Robocop v. Wolverine

Started by dadudemon25 pages

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Really now? OK. Then, on the same note, we always use high end feats over low end feats, yes?

Wolvie was unaffected by Zero's headshot.

Wolvie was KO'd by the cop's headshot.

High end feat= Wolvie was unaffected by Zero's headshot. High end feat= Greatest feat.

Conclusion? Wolvie can not be knocked out by a bullet. Oh my did you see that?

And as for your three seconds: Wolvie can close the gap between them and decap Robo before Robo gets a shot off. Unless the gap is like 100 feet.

Your turn.

Wow. That's, a really good point. Wait, I already made that point. FAIL! Copy cat! 😠 😠 😠

Originally posted by dadudemon
Wow. That's, a really good point. Wait, I already made that point. FAIL! Copy cat! 😠 😠 😠

-oWWbAqSHcE&feature=PlayList&p=EE28F066BDA72B6C&playnext_from=PL&playnext=1&index=3

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Really now? OK. Then, on the same note, we always use high end feats over low end feats, yes?

Wolvie was unaffected by Zero's headshot.

Wolvie was KO'd by the cop's headshot.

High end feat= Wolvie was unaffected by Zero's headshot. High end feat= Greatest feat.

Conclusion? Wolvie can not be knocked out by a bullet. Oh my did you see that?

And as for your three seconds: Wolvie can close the gap between them and decap Robo before Robo gets a shot off. Unless the gap is like 100 feet.

Your turn.

Yes, it's always been that way, you know this, considering what you're arguing in the Marvel Vs JEdi thread, it's hysterical for you to try to pull this here.

But here, the last time it was covered:

Originally posted by Robtard
Wolverine contradicted the character (healing adamantium?) already established in X1-3, might as well not be the same guy. In X1, he was KO'd two times. Once in X2.

Conclusion: Wolverine has been KO'd; it can happen. To argue Robocop has a zero chance in doing it, is nothing more than Wolverine fanboyism.

IMO the X/Wolverine movies contradicts themselves thus this Robo one shot KO thingy is cancelled out, the result is 0. Thus this argument is out the window. Logan has way too much going for him to win with while Robos only chance is done for.

Nullifies the whole thread then.......a stalemate.

Originally posted by Kazenji
Has he even run out of bullets with that gun?

I've never seen that, haha, though I'd imagine.

Originally posted by Robtard
Yes, it's always been that way, you know this, considering what you're arguing in the Marvel Vs JEdi thread, it's hysterical for you to try to pull this here.

But here, the last time it was covered:

Conclusion: Wolverine has been KO'd; it can happen. To argue Robocop has a zero chance in doing it, is nothing more than Wolverine fanboyism.

You're completely ignoring the fact that Robocop is way too slow on the draw. That Wolvie would have to be over 100 feet away for Robo to even get a shot off. AND that Robo uses a puny little 9mm, unlikely to KO Wolvie. 9mm's have been known to bounce off windshields, man.

But it all boils down to Robo being to slow. Only way Robo wins is if Wolvie LETS him.

I also agree on the part that Robo is too slow.

OK people, in X Men 3, Wolvie hears Stryker order his memory erased. He gets pissed, stands up, Zero draws his twin pistols and lets loose two rounds. TWO. They strike Wolverine DEAD CENTER in the forehead. What happens? Wolvie's head rocks back a bit and he gets pissed.

Now, watch this vid:

http://www.hulu.com/watch/12522/x2-x-men-united-pyro-attacks-the-cops

The cop shoots Wolverine ONCE, the bullet strikes OFF CENTER to the right, it hits Wolvie so hard his entire body is thrown back, and he is KO'd

What does this mean? Well, obviously Zero was using a smalled caliber weapon. How do we know this? Because the TWO bullets he shot, the ones that hit Wolverine DEAD CENTER in the forehead, did nothing to Wolverine, it barely fazed him. Whereas the ONE bullet fired by the cop that hit Wolverine DEAD CENTER in the forehead had a much bigger impact, it KO'd Wolverine and rocked his ENTIRE BODY backwards onto the ground. the cop was obviously firing a bigger round, probably a .45.

Having said that, check this out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RoboCop_%28character%29

Robocop uses a 9mm. Zero surely used at least a 9mm. 9mm does shit to Wolvie.

Sooooooo.............Any questions?

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
OK people, in X Men 3, Wolvie hears Stryker order his memory erased. He gets pissed, stands up, Zero draws his twin pistols and lets loose two rounds. TWO. They strike Wolverine DEAD CENTER in the forehead. What happens? Wolvie's head rocks back a bit and he gets pissed.

Now, watch this vid:

http://www.hulu.com/watch/12522/x2-x-men-united-pyro-attacks-the-cops

The cop shoots Wolverine ONCE, the bullet strikes OFF CENTER to the right, it hits Wolvie so hard his entire body is thrown back, and he is KO'd

What does this mean? Well, obviously Zero was using a smalled caliber weapon. How do we know this? Because the TWO bullets he shot, the ones that hit Wolverine DEAD CENTER in the forehead, did nothing to Wolverine, it barely fazed him. Whereas the ONE bullet fired by the cop that hit Wolverine DEAD CENTER in the forehead had a much bigger impact, it KO'd Wolverine and rocked his ENTIRE BODY backwards onto the ground. the cop was obviously firing a bigger round, probably a .45.

Having said that, check this out:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RoboCop_%28character%29

Robocop uses a 9mm. Zero surely used at least a 9mm. 9mm does shit to Wolvie.

Sooooooo.............Any questions?

😆

I'm trying to find a weakness in your argument.

DAAAAAAMN YOUUU!

Well, here's the only weakness: the way his body reacted to the bullet is definitely not related and the director/writers were not thinking about inertia as it related to X2 and Origins.

HA! PWNED! But, since I have no evidence for that (it's logical and is most likely true), your point still stands.

Originally posted by dadudemon
😆

I'm trying to find a weakness in your argument.

DAAAAAAMN YOUUU!

Well, here's the only weakness: the way his body reacted to the bullet is definitely not related and the director/writers were not thinking about inertia as it related to X2 and Origins.

HA! PWNED! But, since I have no evidence for that (it's logical and is most likely true), your point still stands.

It's simple, dude. And non contestable.

And here's the final nail in the coffin:

http://www.closefocusresearch.com/list-handgun-cartridges

Robo is too slow, and he lacks the firepower to take Wolverine down.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
You're completely ignoring the fact that Robocop is way too slow on the draw. That Wolvie would have to be over 100 feet away for Robo to even get a shot off. AND that Robo uses a puny little 9mm, unlikely to KO Wolvie. 9mm's have been known to bounce off windshields, man.

But it all boils down to Robo being to slow. Only way Robo wins is if Wolvie LETS him.

Dude you make the same mistake that youve made for pages and pages...
Assuming that the auto-9 is holstered at the beginning of the conflict.

The auto 9 might not even be involved... Are you telling me that wolverine could take the Cobra Assault cannon int he face whilst running onto it, and not flinch..?

Robocop also has arm mounted cannon as seen in Robocop 3.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Dude you make the same mistake that youve made for pages and pages...
Assuming that the auto-9 is holstered at the beginning of the conflict.

The auto 9 might not even be involved... Are you telling me that wolverine could take the Cobra Assault cannon int he face whilst running onto it, and not flinch..?

Robocop also has arm mounted cannon as seen in Robocop 3.

Yeah, Wolverine and Sabertooth took canon fire BEFORE Wolvie got adamantium.

Yeah but nothing like the explosive shells that the Cobra kicks out.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Dude you make the same mistake that youve made for pages and pages...
Assuming that the auto-9 is holstered at the beginning of the conflict.

The auto 9 might not even be involved... Are you telling me that wolverine could take the Cobra Assault cannon int he face whilst running onto it, and not flinch..?

Robocop also has arm mounted cannon as seen in Robocop 3.

Reading is good:

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
I do not think this has been done...

Logan is in Old Detroit searching for others like him. He then encounters Robocop who believes Logan was sent to take him out..

Robocop has his standard sidearm..

Logan has his adamantium claws..

Can either man stay down long enough for a KO?

Robo has his standard sidearm, the Auto 9. Which, BTW, I have proven is not powerful enough to KO Logan.

Next question.

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Yeah but nothing like the explosive shells that the Cobra kicks out.

That comes no where near as destructive as Jean Grey going Dark Phoenix at the end of X-3. Not even a magnitude close to 100.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Reading is good:

It doesn't matter as it's a none issue, anyway.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Reading is good:

Robo has his standard sidearm, the Auto 9. Which, BTW, I have proven is not powerful enough to KO Logan.

Next question.

Not as good as reading, reflecting, and thinking being posting.

No you haven't.... The accummilative effect of like 100 rounds slamming into him at rapid pace should do it too. None of the previous Marksman have had Robocop's skill with a rapid fire weapon like that....How will wolverine react to 50 shots per eye..?

Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Yeah but nothing like the explosive shells that the Cobra kicks out.

"Robocop has his standard sidearm.."

No cobra for you!!

Ahhhhhhhh soooooooooo..... Confucius say: "When Wolverine has 50 9mm Auto 9 shots in each eye, no Cobra will be neccessary", grasshopper..