Originally posted by Robtard
Wolverine has been knocked out by a single bullet and by other blows. Stands to reason it can happen here.
That is not what is being argued, though. That is NOT being contradicted here.
Here's the reasoning behind where I was going with this:
If you are going to use a "high-end" feat for Robocop pulling out his gun (which can make this versus completely change directions, in your opinion), then we only go with high-end feats from Wolverine, as well. Meaning, Wolvie does not get knocked out by a bullet to the head, we use his other showings which were better.
If you want to use Robo's low end feat of 6 seconds to draw and be ready to fire, then we go with the low-end version of Wolvie that got knocked out by a bullet. However, neither "version" changes the outcome for this vs. Not even a little.
Originally posted by Robtard
LoL, poor form, dude, poor form. "Wolverine was never seen cutting a Cyborg, so he can't"; but we both know that is stupid too. Robocop is seen having dead-on aim, due to his computer targeting.
I'm glad you brought this up because it will illustrate a point.
What you just tried to do, above, is a perfect example of a non sequitor argument. What is the Cyborg comprised of? (Specifically, his armor.) Titanium. Is titanium resistant to adamantium? No. The only thing that can pwn adamantium is adamantium, stated by Striker. Striker proved it on-screen.
On top of that, we have Wolverine cutting through a vault door that was about a foot thick, most likely made of high quality steel. He made it seem like butter. Mind you, Titanium is around the hardness of high quality steel. What does this mean? Robocop would get diced, like a butter.
Originally posted by Robtard
Not really, this thread specified the winner can win via "KO"; Robocop would have a chance, considering this silly catered scenario.
You're right. But, as I explained above, Wolverine doesn't get KO'd, regardless if we use low or high end feats from either character.