Robocop v. Wolverine

Originally posted by KingD19
What happened the other times Wolverine got shot before he got his skeleton? Nothing.

Hahaha you still don't get what I'm getting at do you. This is our convo in a nutshell:

1) YOU and other Wolvie fan-boys claim Robo has no chance (0% probability) of Ko'ing or stunning Wolvie.

2) I (and others before me) point out Wolvie getting Ko'ed by a single bullet and tree branch and even him pissing himself when his bones are broken.

3) Based on these showings, I claim that Robo has a chance of at least stunning or Ko'ing Wolvie based on these showings.

4) Wolvie fan boys get pissed off and choose to TOTALLY ignore these showings and focus on this good feats, ignoring Wolvies inconsistent bad-assdom.

5) Wolvie fans call me dumb for pointing out that Robo could win. While the gingerly patting themselves on the back for thinking that Wolvie can tank REPEATED shots from Robo's accurate aim.

6)Wolvie fan-boys continue to wank Wolvie and go in circles.

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
out of curiosity, did i say otherwise?

Originally posted by Blinky
Hahaha you still don't get what I'm getting at do you. This is our convo in a nutshell:

1) YOU and other Wolvie fan-boys claim Robo has no chance (0% probability) of Ko'ing or stunning Wolvie.

2) I (and others before me) point out Wolvie getting Ko'ed by a single bullet and tree branch and even him pissing himself when his bones are broken.

3) Based on these showings, I claim that Robo has a chance of at least stunning or Ko'ing Wolvie based on these showings.

4) Wolvie fan boys get pissed off and choose to TOTALLY ignore these showings and focus on this good feats, ignoring Wolvies inconsistent bad-assdom.

5) Wolvie fans call me dumb for pointing out that Robo could win. While the gingerly patting themselves on the back for thinking that Wolvie can tank REPEATED shots from Robo's accurate aim.

6)Wolvie fan-boys continue to wank Wolvie and go in circles.

Hahaha nah but you argued for the point, just for kicks... apparetly... :/

you did it wrong. let me explain what the real summary is.

1. we state that going by how debates work on this forum, wolverine wins.

2. you state that if we ignore how debates work on this forum and use a retarded different way, then robocop can win.

3. ... I state that thats irrelevant and that youre trolling for a specific answer.

4. you say funny stuff

and now here we are 😐

How do you explain the following:

Zero shot Wolvie with a 9mm and it did nothing to Wolvie.

Some cop shoots Wolvie in the head and it KO's him.

Explain that.

The only possible reason is that the cop used a higher caliber weapon.

Seeing as how Robocop uses a 9mm, how does he KO Wolvie? And please, none of this "Robo has 50 9mm bullets ZOMG!!!" If one does nothing, 50 will do nothing.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
How do you explain the following:

Zero shot Wolvie with a 9mm and it did nothing to Wolvie.

Some cop shoots Wolvie in the head and it KO's him.

Explain that.

The only possible reason is that the cop used a higher caliber weapon.

Seeing as how Robocop uses a 9mm, how does he KO Wolvie? And please, none of this "Robo has 50 9mm bullets ZOMG!!!" If one does nothing, 50 will do nothing.

So if I punch you in the face once and you smile, 50 won't be any better? Umkay. You're so bad-ass. Don't be a chode.

Originally posted by Blinky
So if I punch you in the face once and you smile, 50 won't be any better? Umkay. You're so bad-ass. Don't be a chode.

But I dont have a Wolvie healing factor. Wolvie does.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
If I had a Wolvie like healing factor? Yes, I'd heal and then kick the shit out of you.

But I dont have a Wolvie healing factor. Wolvie does.

Yeah it works just fine, instantanously all the time. Yes?

Originally posted by Blinky
Yeah it works just fine, instantanously all the time. Yes?

Wolvie...fast.
Robo.....slow.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Yeah, Wolvie just stands there and let's Robo shoot him the whole time, yeah? wanker

Wolvie...fast.
Robo.....slow.

So now Wolvie can't be tagged with a machine gun? Jesus Christ. Is Wolvie fast enough to evade uber-accurate machine gun fire? No. Nothing in X1-3 or origins suggest this.

Also you're assuming Wolvie is close, I already admitted if Wolvie is close; Robo is scrap metal.

This should cinch it.

Agent Zero is faster and a better shot than Robo, yet he was able to tag Wolvie in the head just once.

Do I need to elaborate?

This isn't Agent Zero Vs Wolverine, it's Robocop Vs Wolverine.

Blinky, I'm no Wolverine fanboy. He's one of the most overrated characters ever. I'm not suggesting there's no conceivable way for Robocop to win, that it's an impossibility.

I'm saying it's so improbable that to give Robocop the definite win is what's stupid. I've proven why.

I'd also like to remind everyone that the only reason he got knocked out was because Stryker used an adamantium bullet. Zero shot him in the head with regular bullets and he just got mad.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
Yeah, Wolvie just stands there and let's Robo shoot him the whole time, yeah? wanker

Wolvie...fast.
Robo.....slow.

Funny, because that's how most of your Versus fights go. You believe you (As in YOU personally, Rogue Jedi) could beat/kill Batman by shooting him.

I understand people learn and adapt opinions etc, but don't say one thing and then believe or promote the opposite about a week later. You just come off as a super hypocrite.

-AC

Originally posted by Alpha Centauri
This isn't Agent Zero Vs Wolverine, it's Robocop Vs Wolverine.

Blinky, I'm no Wolverine fanboy. He's one of the most overrated characters ever. I'm not suggesting there's no conceivable way for Robocop to win, that it's an impossibility.

I'm saying it's so improbable that to give Robocop the definite win is what's stupid. I've proven why.

I'd also like to remind everyone that the only reason he got knocked out was because Stryker used an adamantium bullet. Zero shot him in the head with regular bullets and he just got mad.

Funny, because that's how most of your Versus fights go. You believe you (As in YOU personally, Rogue Jedi) could beat/kill Batman by shooting him.

I understand people learn and adapt opinions etc, but don't say one thing and then believe or promote the opposite about a week later. You just come off as a super hypocrite.

-AC

And yes, I believe if I had a gun with armor piercing rounds I'd kill MOVIE Batman. Easily.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
This should cinch it.

Agent Zero is faster and a better shot than Robo, yet he was able to tag Wolvie in the head just once.

Do I need to elaborate?

That's not really right. The time Zero shot him in the head, Wolverine had just revived and emerged from the adamantium-bonding process. Wolverine didn't even attempt to to avoid the shot, as typical.

But honestly, including that movie is wrong, imo. It doesn't follow the three movies that came before it. It was nothing more than masturbation material for 12 year old fanboys.

I'd also argue that Zero isn't a better shot than Robocop, they're likely the same, as they don't miss when they're on their game.

But your argument that Robocop won't be able to unload his entire clip anywhere he wishes into Wolverine with pinpoint accuracy is also flawed, as we see, Robocop has computer tracking and unerring accuracy because of it. Again, this is on the grounds that Wolverine isn't right up in his face from the start.

Originally posted by Rogue Jedi
When it comes to drawing and firing, I am WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY faster than Robo. I'd empty half a clip before his gun clears his holster. Full clip before he aims and fires.

And yes, I believe if I had a gun with armor piercing rounds I'd kill MOVIE Batman. Easily.

I know you believe you would or could do all those things, RJ.

That's the problem, but that's lost on you. It's truly lost on you how ridiculous you look when seriously making those claims.

-AC

K.

Originally posted by Robtard

But honestly, including that movie is wrong, imo. It doesn't follow the three movies that came before it. It was nothing more than masturbation material for 12 year old fanboys.

I'd also argue that Zero isn't a better shot than Robocop, they're likely the same, as they don't miss when they're on their game.

Since the movie is a prequel, the X movies should follow it. Despite how bad it was, sequels are supposed to follow continuity set by prequels, not the other way around.

And yeah, Zero's a better shot, neither of them miss, but Zero's was making headshots, upside down, in mid-air, without looking, and the people he was shooting were on the side of him, Robocop could never pull that off.

Whoa I missed that haermm

Originally posted by KingD19
Since the movie is a prequel, the X movies should follow it. Despite how bad it was, sequels are supposed to follow continuity set by prequels, not the other way around.

And yeah, Zero's a better shot, neither of them miss, but Zero's was making headshots, upside down, in mid-air, without looking, and the people he was shooting were on the side of him, Robocop could never pull that off.

Well, it didn't, just one example, does Wolverine have the ability to heal his adamantium? No, he doesn't.

Robocop shot people behind him, without looking.

Doing complicated gun kata mid-air and hitting targets>>>>>>>>>>>>>Shooting people behind you

Zero even drew his gun, fired a shot, then holstered it, Wolverine's cigar was pulp afterwards, and he was only like 3-4 feet away.

YouTube video

Start at around 1:17, and the other part I was talking about was the building infiltration scene, around 1:45

I'd like to see Robocop pull that off, and prove he's as skilled as Zero.

Originally posted by KingD19
Since the movie is a prequel, the X movies should follow it. Despite how bad it was, sequels are supposed to follow continuity set by prequels, not the other way around.

And yeah, Zero's a better shot, neither of them miss, but Zero's was making headshots, upside down, in mid-air, without looking, and the people he was shooting were on the side of him, Robocop could never pull that off.

We then have to consider what to consider an actual ability of Wolverine's then, since the prequel and X-Men movies contradict each other.

Zero shot the man in the head and he growled. A shaky cop shot him in the head outside Iceman's home and he went out like a light.

What do we go with? The two clearly contradict one another. Logic suggests we go with the prequel, simply because it came later. So Wolverine being able to take a bullet to the head is a RECENT decision.

-AC

Originally posted by KingD19

I'd like to see Robocop pull that off, and prove he's as skilled as Zero.

Obviously being a ton of cyborg he can't, but he never misses(same as Zero), when he's functioning right. So what does it matter if he kills a guy behind him while on his feet or doing an unnecessary back-flip?

So we have two guys who can kill guys that aren't in their line of sight and never miss.