Darth Maul v. General Grievous

Originally posted by Impediment
By the way, Lucas "threw" Darth Maul away.

Originally posted by Impediment
Duly noted.

<object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ldTtmeYzOgo&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ldTtmeYzOgo&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object>

Originally posted by Impediment
I rest my case. By the way, Lucas "threw" Darth Maul away.

Originally posted by Impediment
Duly noted.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ldTtmeYzOgo

If you are going to derail the thread with banal videos instead of contributing an intelligent rebuttal, then I invite you to leave.

This goes for everyone.

😆

Intelligent rebuttals, huh? You critiqued my grammar!

Your the one going off topic about Maul being a throwaway character. Which I don't mind, but don't go all Lee Ermey on me for something your enticing.

Maul wins. He is an adept Force user and a superior sword combatant than Grievous in his weakened state. Can I go swing now?

Maul IS a throwaway character, in my opinion. How in the Blue Hell is that going off topic. Or are you just sore from not having any kind of rebuttal except to exacerbate my previous post?

You have no idea who or what R. Lee Ermy is or what he is capable of. Poor choice, indeed.

Swing away. Away from this thread, if that is all you can give to the debate.

Originally posted by Impediment
You have no idea who or what R. Lee Ermy is or what he is capable of. Poor choice, indeed.

youre wrong about everything though martin

Originally posted by BruceSkywalker
Got the idea from the Star Wars versus forum where a similar thread exists..

WOAH WOAH WOAH

Back it up.

In the Versus forum, Maul wasn't allowed to use the force offensively (attack his organs). Can he now?

Originally posted by Impediment
no.

Maul IS as fast, is at least as good a swordsman. AOTC GG and ROTS GG is a shadow of the animated series GG. Maul has force precog and force push on his side here.

GG tries his buzzsaw atttack? Shit, Maul force pushes him away, or force grabs something and hurls it at him. GG gets distracted by the flying debris, Maul decaps.

Try to come up with something better than "no." 😉

why? every discussion people have with you ends up going in circles...

you get a "no." and thats it.

Maul has many impressive feats and accolades to his name. Anoon was a testament to his incredible bladework. TPM novelization describes how Maul manhandled Qui-Gon, the man who is on even footing with Windu. There is no evidence that suggests a Grievous victory.

EU doesnt count here

Originally posted by Ms.Marvel
why? every discussion people have with you ends up going in circles...

you get a "no." and thats it.

Nah, I get a "no" because you got nothing left. I'll say it again, slower this time.

TPM Maul is as fast as AOTC and ROTS GG. He is at least as good a swordsman. Maul has force precog, push and grab, GG does not.

Advantage Maul.

Maul, when confronted by two Jedi in TPM, stood his ground and pwned them hard. He was killed because of his arrogance, but he won the saber/force battle. GG, when confronted by two Jedi in ROTS? He ran like a beeotch. Why? Because he knew he could not defeat them. Hell, he couldn't even defeat one.

Screen feats with a saber, advantage Maul.

Screen feats and powers go to Maul.

Score's two nothin', your turn. 😄

Lemmee guess......."no." It's OK, sorry about your legs.

rj.

no.

cause i mean obviously ive "got nothing left", whatever the hell that means. not that i just dont want to spend the next 30 pages arguing in circles with you which is what always happens with you. clearly its that ive "got nothing left", whatever the hell that means.

Hmm? No counter? No superior screen feats for GG?

Thought not.

Your argument:

mfG7o5TgvjI&feature=channel

You're using "RJ, i just dont want to spend the next 30 pages arguing in circles with you" as a substitute for "OK, AOTC and ROTS GG has absolutely zero screen feats that compare to Maul's screen feats."

If he did, you'd use them. He don't, so you aren't.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/concede

con·cede
&#8194; &#8194;/k&#601;n&#712;sid/ Show Spelled [kuhn-seed] Show IPA verb,-ced·ed, -ced·ing.
–verb (used with object)
1.
to acknowledge as true, just, or proper; admit: He finally conceded that she was right.
2.
to acknowledge (an opponent's victory, score, etc.) before it is officially established: to concede an election before all the votes are counted.
3.
to grant as a right or privilege; yield: to concede a longer vacation for all employees.

reported 🙂

have a nice day.

haermm right?

Reported why? For what? For burying your argument neck deep? K.

And yeah, big ass haermm . Epic butthurt haermm

You see, we compare screen feats here. Maul has better screen feats. I listed them. It's up to you to counter them. You can't, because there aren't any.

See how that works?

Grievous would pwn Darth Maul.

Maul got owned by a rookie Kenobi, while Grivevous gave a seasoned Kenobi a run for his money.

Originally posted by Bouboumaster
Grievous would pwn Darth Maul.

Maul got owned by a rookie Kenobi, while Grivevous gave a seasoned Kenobi a run for his money.

Wrong. Maul beat Kenobi AND Qui Gon. He lost because he thought he had Kenobi beat. He faced down TWO Jedi and beat them saber to saber.

GG ran from two Jedi. And dude, Kenobi was clearly kicking GG's ass saber to saber. What did GG do then? He ran. He ran, he ran so far away.

GG gave Kenobi a run for his money when Kenobi was disarmed. Of course if you disarm Maul GG will give Maul a run for his money.