Originally posted by Robtard
Considering this is the Movie Vs. forum, that is the thing to do.What do you suggest we look at in determing who's a better dueist, if not the fights?
🙁
You misunderstand my point. You can't determine if Kenobi improved or not, simply by looking at the fights.
AOTC Kenobi lost to Dooku.
ROTS Kenobi lost to Dooku.
We can't see that he improved, but that's where the novels come into play. From the quote above, it's quite evident that Kenobi was a match for Dooku, even though Dooku won.
Another example of this is TPM. As Qui-Gon fought Maul, the novel says Maul wasn't even trying, whereas on screen, all we see is a flashy battle.