LOK3 Defiance vs. Twilight Princess

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Yeah, I thought it was a funny joke too.

I agree with the first part. But you would indeed be included among the group.

I learned to "debate" from the best. See, 'cause I actually read your posts.

I've already learned this lesson as stated above. Can we move on to Toonforce claiming 203?

Doubtful. And I'll have you know that I am a master debat-- er, never mind.

No, but seriously. Not debate. Discussion, maybe. Arguments, definitely.

Wow what a counter, a pretty much "no you!" AND flaming all in one...what further proof do I need of your inadequacy?

YouTube video

Good old V for vendeeta,I seem to see it often when replying to LoZ fans.

Reading posts (unlikely from your statements) is not the same as learning from them.

If only you did learn from your mistakes, I would not have to re-teach and correct you every time.

As I said, you know little of debating, only that theres not a lot here mostly because as you like to display, there are too many angry fanboys and trolls.

Both of you will stop flaming. Next one gets a warning.

And BT, don't you dare attempt to play innocent at this one. You are flaming and trolling just as much as Moo is.

Quote it

"I think someone whos proven themselves stupid and idiotic time and time again deserves the nickname "shithead" or something thereabouts and its not me"

"you just dont bother to look at it as if your baseless opinion>the game"

"This at the moment is not a debate, but its against you who are not a debator "shrug". Thats probably why you have no clue about what you are doing when you blunder into threads."

All from your post quoted in the one you reported.

At most, that first one is trolling but I was completly ambigious and did not name a sole.

Calling someones opinion as baseless is neither trolling or flaming. Its a fair comment regardless of whom disagrees with it being baseless or not.

Saying someone cannot debate is not trolling or attacking anyone, infact its less tame than calling someone a **** or an idiot which you have done on occassion.

I think your own opinion against me is getting in the way of your professionalism as a moderator 🙂 you ignore anything that you cannot include me as part of the fault even when I have little to no input in the "flaming" or "trolling".

"edit", apprently calling someone a tw** is indeed censored...

Originally posted by Burning thought
At most, that first one is trolling but I was completly ambigious and did not name a sole.

Calling someones opinion as baseless is neither trolling or flaming. Its a fair comment regardless of whom disagrees with it being baseless or not.

Saying someone cannot debate is not trolling or attacking anyone, infact its less tame than calling someone a **** or an idiot which you have done on occassion.

I think your own opinion against me is getting in the way of your professionalism as a moderator 🙂 you ignore anything that you cannot include me as part of the fault even when I have little to no input in the "flaming" or "trolling".

"edit", apprently calling someone a tw** is indeed censored...

Soul, not sole. We're not talking about fish nor shoes here. Nor is the fact that you did not name names relevant. It is still both trolling and flaming.

And yes, comments like that are trolling and flaming. You do not understand the concept of "attack the argument, not the poster". This is not my problem, and this is not bias. This is truth. Your opinion if you are trolling or flaming is also irrelevant. Moo also got told to stop it, because both of you were in the wrong. Who started doesn't matter. We're not in kindergarten anymore. If you continue, you are just as liable as everyone else involved.

This isn't up for discussion - if you're told to stop something, then you stop. If you continue, you get warned. If you argue it? Well, that's even less intelligent to do.

And of course it's censored.

Lul, if naming names mattered he would not have had the grounds to report me in the first place.

Originally posted by Burning thought
ha! I think someone whos proven themselves stupid and idiotic time and time again deserves the nickname "shithead" or something thereabouts and its not me 🙂 infact I could name several.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
I agree with the first part. But you would indeed be included among the group.

Please you two, drop it... It's been back and forward for over 80 pages, and nothing seems to be getting accomplished short of flaming and snide comments.

Originally posted by MooCowofJustice
Lul, if naming names mattered he would not have had the grounds to report me in the first place.

Originally posted by Burning thought

Further, this thread is obviously done with real debate. It's now closed.