Originally posted by quanchi112Everyone experienced their death.But do you think they would have experienced it if they didn't really die?Galactus would not have died from the supernova suns so he wouldn't experience his death.So if drax wouldn't have died why would he?
This was a universal wide extinction event anyways and it didn't occur so really what's the point?
Originally posted by quanchi112
It didn't occur anyways.
Originally posted by Black bolt z
Everyone experienced their death.But do you think they would have experienced it if they didn't really die?Galactus would not have died from the supernova suns so he wouldn't experience his death.So if drax wouldn't have died why would he?
Originally posted by quanchi112Stop quaneuvering around your mistake. You needed support for your arguments that A.Maelstrom was far less powerful than IG-Thanos. So you tried to undercut A.Maelstrom's power by insinuating that he was defeated by the "more-powerful" Quasar. Except that insinuation is patently false. Because it wasn't Quasar's power that destroyed A.Maelstrom. It was A.Maelstrom's own power that did that.
Wrong he was defeated because of Quasar's actions he wouldn't have lost if Quasar hadn't opposed him.
Originally posted by quanchi112Bios also outright state that Thanos doesn't have matter manipulation powers. Bios also support that A.Maelstrom was superior to IG-Thanos. The evidence that the UN instantly destroyed/recreated the Marvel Multiverse was presented to you three times.
Wrong we have multiple bios which correctly state this and you have zero evidence to suggest it destroyed the multiverse.No, reasonable people change their minds unlike you when it's even stated in black and white you still deny it because honestly you don't care about anything other than being right.
First time by Mr Master who you agreed with. After you changed your mind after being cornered by that fact, I then proved it to you again. You changed your mind a second time and agreed the UN destroyed/recreated the Marvel Multiverse. Then you decided it was fine and dandy to change your mind back a third time. At this point, you're just making a fool of yourself. Reasonable people don't change their minds three times on the same exact issue looking at the same exact scans.
Originally posted by quanchi112Except by your standards A.Maelstrom was superior to IG-Thanos. Plainly illustrated that way on-panel. And the bio confirms so.
We actually see on panel Maelstrom lose to far less, become more powerful than when he darts around talking trash to various beings, and the whole time he was far less than the ig. He's not superior to the ig nor was he portrayed that way during the arc.Bio clearly states you are wrong. Deal with it. He un can only destroy a universe and in the arc you claimed it destroyed a multiverse you were wrong and the bio proves it.
Tanking one blast and leaving and getting killed twice by far less than the ig doesn't prove the ig can't hurt you.
Ig>>far superior than the un which only took away Abraxas' past actions.
Reed stated outright that the UN would destroy the combined realities of the Multiverse. And that's what it did in the end. I don't have a problem with your fallacious reliance on bios as long as you don't do it selectively. As soon as you admit Thanos can't use matter manipulation and A.Maelstrom was superior to IG-Thanos, then you won't be arguing with me anymore. I'll leave you to your bio-reliant delusions.
Being completely immune to the IG's power and operating completely outside the IG's prescience on-panel and having that plain presentation confirmed by bios actually kinda does show A.Maelstrom was simply immune. He was an Anomaly after all.
Abraxas' past actions were not taken away. You can't have memories of past actions that never existed. Try explaining how you can have memories of past events that never existed in the first place.
^ It's called the quanchiwaffle. He first believed that the UN destroyed the Multiverse. But because I was relying on that fact and he was cornered by it, he decided to change his mind and not believe it. Then after I posted scans proving it, he changed his mind again and acknowledged the UN did destroy the Multiverse. But now he doesn't again. Say it with me now: quanchiwaffling.
Originally posted by Omega Vision😂
Actually he has. He remembers winning his debates with you.
Originally posted by Black bolt zI'm arguing with his self-serving arguments. I'm not advocating that position. Back when he wasn't quanchiwaffling over whether the UN destroyed the Marvel Multiverse, and acknowledged that it did, he kept arguing that because the IG "looked" superior to the UN, then it must be more powerful, despite never demonstrating anywhere near that level of power the UN achieved.
Also ODG,i'm still wondering how you think malestrom>IG.Malestrom is empowered by oblivion and IG>all abstracts(excluding LT)
But that argument can be completely applied to A.Maelstrom and IG-Thanos. Because A.Maelstrom "looked" superior to IG-Thanos, so he must be more powerful, despite never demonstrating anywhere near the level of power IG-Thanos achieved.
But he can't stand acknowledging that same exact argument in the second comparison because it completely eviscerates his imaginary cosmic hierarchy. So he'll simply abandon consistency -- using that argument in one instance and completely ignore it in another -- as it conveniently suits him. And essentially, that's what his arguments have been reduced to...
... well that and arguing that nullifying a marble slowly = nullifying/recreating the entire Marvel Multiverse instantly.