The Force Unleashed II

Originally posted by Eminence
I do not. The Sith Emperor > Palpatine. The latter is clearly the driving force behind the events of the trilogies - to understate it - but his far more brilliant, attractive, and long-lived predecessor shook the galaxy as much or more and for so much longer; he is easily the most impactful (and lovely) of all characters in the saga.

And I noticed you decided not to respond to anything else in my posts, which means you concede everything.

This pleases me more.

Lotz more.

While Me and most people are very excited about the Sith Emperor and the entire concept(AS A STANDALONE), he spent 1400 years getting his forces together, only to conquer half of the galaxy, only to withdraw in seclusion, while the Jedi still existed, and in greater numbers.. Now obviously we can tie this off to halfassed shit writing by Bioware, but I guess it's canon. However, Revan did more in 5 years than the Sith Emperor did in 1400. Revan took the Republic Fleet, turned it, and used Star Force armada to leave the Republic on the brink of collapse, with barely "99 jedi remaining". Palpatine spent 20 years becoming the head of the Republic, started a war and led both sides of it to destroy the Jedi Order, did so and created the greatest military force in the Star Wars Mythos. I'm sorry but the Sith Emperor just doesn't compare.

Originally posted by Enyalus
Your numbers are way off.

So is your thought process of replying seriously to that.

You're talking about the Vader/Malak rip-off that's immortal right? Check it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOvbv-LkK6w

I'm so sorry!!!! 300 years....big difference. This is garbage lol. Sith Emperor is a loser, just accept it.

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
While Me and most people are very excited about the Sith Emperor and the entire concept(AS A STANDALONE), he spent 1400 years getting his forces together, only to conquer half of the galaxy, only to withdraw in seclusion, while the Jedi still existed, and in greater numbers.. Now obviously we can tie this off to halfassed shit writing by Bioware, but I guess it's canon. However, Revan did more in 5 years than the Sith Emperor did in 1400. Revan took the Republic Fleet, turned it, and used Star Force armada to leave the Republic on the brink of collapse, with barely "99 jedi remaining". Palpatine spent 20 years becoming the head of the Republic, started a war and lead both sides of it to destroy the Jedi Order, did so and created the greatest military force in the Star Wars Mythos. I'm sorry but the Sith Emperor just doesn't compare.

Thank you. Palpy pwns Sith Emperor.

TOR could still be a good game though, but that's about it.

SWFan4Life
The Sith Emperor is so NOT > Palpatine.

And he's also way better looking.

S
The Sith Emperor needed hundreds of mini-Sith Lords to get to where he was.

2) The idea that Palpatine didn't require assistance "to get to where he was" is inane. These people need pawns for one purpose or another.

S
The fact that he lived longer is simply because he hadn't been killed yet,

S
not because Palpatine didn't have the ability to transfer his essence (which he did).

S
And remaining hidden for 350 years, and then coming up out of the blue, with a built-up army? It took Sith Emperor 350 YEARS to do what Sidious did in less than 30 years...

Palpatine's rise to power was put into motion by Darth Bane and aided in some part by every Master of the line. Once again, the idea that he had no assistance in his ascent is inane, and since the "hundreds of mini-Sith Lords" detract from the merit accorded to the TOR Emperor the same goes for Palpatine.

The Sith Emperor > 3 x [Order of Two], which means at best Palpatine < 1/3 [The Sith Emperor].

I win.

S
and Palpatine didn't even need to raise his own Sith army, he just used the Republic to build his Empire!! How is that not the ultimate deception?

S
Gideon help me out here.

Edit: En, it's okay. He will learn.

Originally posted by SWFan4Life
You're talking about the Vader/Malak rip-off that's immortal right? Check it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOvbv-LkK6w

I'm so sorry!!!! 300 years....big difference. This is garbage lol. Sith Emperor is a loser, just accept it.

And your thought process is still hopeless.

Originally posted by Enyalus
The Sith Lord in your link is not the Sith Emperor, it is Darth Malgus, one of the Sith Emperor's lackeys. The Sith Emperor looks a lot like a bald Galen Marek with red-yellow eyes. He's shown in one of the webcomics. And again, he wasn't hiding for 300 years. Your numbers are way off. He's hid since the Great Hyperspace War...meaning he's been in hiding for 1400 years.

And your thought process is still hopeless.

I sincerely hope that that's a "clone", because it looks like GI Jane..

Enyalus
The Sith Lord in your link is not the Sith Emperor, it is Darth Malgus, one of the Sith Emperor's lackeys. The Sith Emperor looks a lot like a bald Galen Marek with red-yellow eyes. He's shown in one of the webcomics.

The Emperor is like Muhammad in that he can't be shown in art form, and unlike Muhammad in that he literally can't be seen in art, period.

He's too hot.

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
I sincerely hope that that's a "clone", because it looks like GI Jane..

Originally posted by Eminence
Gideon cannot save you. Only my new powers can.

Originally posted by Enyalus
It has to be a clone of some kind. There were no human Sith Lords during the Golden Age of the Sith (that were depicted, anyway.) Just...crazy.

😂

Well, apparently they retconned that shit with the "Lost Tribe of the Sith" nonsense. So apparently there were human sith, not sure if they were lords or not but they were definitely lackeys and they weren't on the council

Ah. I haven't read any of the Fate of the Jedi series.

Sadow, art be damned, was specifically noted to be of almost pure Jedi [human] lineage, while the majority of his peers and underlings were of course more deeply mixed in blood. Ragnos himself was a half-breed, and I've always taken that to mean he had a human parent.

Originally posted by Eminence
Sadow, art be damned, was specifically noted to be of almost pure Jedi [human] lineage, while the majority of his peers and underlings were of course more deeply mixed in blood.

Originally posted by Eminence
He is.

And he's also way better looking.

1) Prove it.

2) The idea that Palpatine didn't require assistance "to get to where he was" is inane. These people need pawns for one purpose or another.

dat must mean he sucks!

This is irrelevant.

Rather, it took the Sith Emperor (less than) "350 YEARS" to do what the entire Order of Two did in just under... a thousand.

Palpatine's rise to power was put into motion by Darth Bane and aided in some part by every Master of the line. Once again, the idea that he had no assistance in his ascent is inane, and since the "hundreds of mini-Sith Lords" detract from the merit accorded to the TOR Emperor the same goes for Palpatine.

The Sith Emperor > 3 x [Order of Two], which means at best Palpatine < 1/3 [The Sith Emperor].

I win.

How is that remotely relevant?!!

Gideon cannot save you. Only my new powers can.

Edit: En, it's okay. He will learn.

Instead of going round and round with you, let's just ask that if the Sith Emperor was better, than why not make the movies around the Sith Emperor, instead of the weakling Palpatine? Why would we have the movies focusing on a weaker Sith Lord (Palpatine) and his exploits? Wouldn't people rather want to see an immortal Sith Emperor (Vader/Malak hack?)

Dude. The Sith Emperor is nothing like Vader or Malak. Why do you keep saying that?

I don't understand where this idea that "more powerful/immortal" equates to "better/more entertaining".

SWFan4Life
Instead of going round and round with you

S
let's just ask that if the Sith Emperor was better, than why not make the movies around the Sith Emperor, instead of the weakling Palpatine? Why would we have the movies focusing on a weaker Sith Lord (Palpatine) and his exploits? Wouldn't people rather want to see an immortal Sith Emperor (Vader/Malak hack?)

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington
While Me and most people are very excited about the Sith Emperor and the entire concept(AS A STANDALONE), he spent 1400 years getting his forces together, only to conquer half of the galaxy, only to withdraw in seclusion, while the Jedi still existed, and in greater numbers.. Now obviously we can tie this off to halfassed shit writing by Bioware, but I guess it's canon. However, Revan did more in 5 years than the Sith Emperor did in 1400. Revan took the Republic Fleet, turned it, and used Star Force armada to leave the Republic on the brink of collapse, with barely "99 jedi remaining". Palpatine spent 20 years becoming the head of the Republic, started a war and led both sides of it to destroy the Jedi Order, did so and created the greatest military force in the Star Wars Mythos. I'm sorry but the Sith Emperor just doesn't compare.

Originally posted by Eminence
It's really sad that you've been completely dominatedwalled by what should be an untenable position.

I'm very, very happy the world doesn't work the way you think it does. Stop being dumb.

I have to come down to a certain level for you to understand how ludicrous your view is. Answer the question son.

If you continue to disrespect my master, I will get upset.

Originally posted by Dr McBeefington

I know dude, but some people are just stuck in the past...