Twilight vs Aliens

lmao. this is dumb as phuck. Ok, since the rule is janky as hell and they don't permit facts that are not yet seen on screen... no one should be able to make a thread about Twilight until all the movies are out.

Reading, is apparently bad.

we also use characters from specific movies and sequels.. it is fine to use new moon since it is the most recent movie so far. if at any time some thing in three or god forgive 4 if it makes it that far then we can simply open a new thread and say from part 1, 2 or 3 whatever specific storyline or character we wanna use.. this is done all the time.

to be honest your attitude is getting annoying.

hence why we say robocop from part 1 or 2 when we wanna be specific. so stop your whining follow the rules or stop posting i cant believe the mod has allowed you to get this far

Originally posted by marwash22

As for Strength... ok, you don't know jack about Twilight, but have you at least watched Predator or Alien movies? Predators are just as strong as any of the Cullen's, with exception to Carlisle.

No.

Lol, what an idiotic statement coming from someone who claims to know about Twilight and Predator. Utterly unbelievable.

A predator cannot uproot a giant tree with one hand. A Predator cannot stop a speeding truck with one arm. A Predator cannot bitchslap a large werewolf back fifty meters.

Insane Strength Advantage

Originally posted by marwash22
As far as durability, The Cullen's aint gut punching shit 'cause Predator's armor is completely resistant to physical attack... the only thing that penetrates it in the entire series of movies, is it's own weaponry and the acid spit from an Xeno.

No.

You know how easily it was ripped off? Yow know the armor only covers the chest? You know the aliens can impale through it no problem? You know Predators can still get every bone in their body broken despite the "armor"?

Insane Durability Advantage

Originally posted by marwash22

Next, let's negate the speed advantage the Cullen's have... how in the phuck are they gonna use that speed when they won't even be able to see the Predator's? Twilight vamps can't see alternative color spectrum's and when the Predator's cloak, the Vamps are screwed.

No.

This has nothing to do with the "alternative color spectrum". The cloak is imperfect because the edges of their silhouette is distorted with its surroundings. Same spectrum.

Insane Speed Advantage

Originally posted by marwash22

Then there's the fact that Xeno acid burns through titanium as soon as it touches it and it continues to burn through until it destroys whatever is under the surface.

Thats the only thing here that might be in favor of team AvP (who said Aliens wouldn't try to kick Predator's ass too anyway?), and you don't know how it'd react to their skin. Lets say three of the Cullens smashes the alien's head in one punch and they get acid exposure and actually die (even though after the first kill, they would wise up), theres still 4 of the Cullens left, even though only one is needed to rip the Predator apart.

Originally posted by marwash22
Predator's have plasma weapons that will completely negate in form of regen the Twilight Vamps have...

Um, plasma weapons probably won't do shit to the Cullens. Secondly, Cullens are too fast to be hit by it. And if we go by your "predator would be invisible" theory (which is utter shit, poorly made up), firing the plasma would expose his position and his head would be ripped off before he knew it.

And yea, you did do a 180 on the Twilight Vamps.

Cullens take this 10/10 with possibly one casualty if acid can harm them.

in predator the movie one of the younger predators was able to knock down a tree with a kick and walk on it iirc..

the one with arnold

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
in predator the movie one of the younger predators was able to knock down a tree with a kick and walk on it iirc..

the one with arnold

Don't remember that. And there was only one predator in that movie (sounded like you implied there were more when you said "one of the younger predators"😉.

Originally posted by Placidity
Don't remember that. And there was only one predator in that movie (sounded like you implied there were more when you said "one of the younger predators"😉.

like i said earlier the alien vs predator movies they were smashing punching and clawing through rock surfaces

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
i was just implying that it wasnt an elder predator like in requiem which is who is fighting in this thread

Ah I get you. Still pretty sure he never kicked down a tree.

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
we also use characters from specific movies and sequels.. it is fine to use new moon since it is the most recent movie so far. if at any time some thing in three or god forgive 4 if it makes it that far then we can simply open a new thread and say from part 1, 2 or 3 whatever specific storyline or character we wanna use.. this is done all the time.

to be honest your attitude is getting annoying.

hence why we say robocop from part 1 or 2 when we wanna be specific. so stop your whining follow the rules or stop posting i cant believe the mod has allowed you to get this far

I don't have an attitude. If the way i phrase things comes off as such, it should be noted that, it is not my intention. I really don't see how anything i have written is any different in tone than what other's have written. You're making it seem like I'm sitting at home banging my head against the desk and keyboard 'cause I'm pissed someone is disagreeing with me... not the case, I just defend my position. Lighten up!

Ok, thats fine about the being specific part. However, it has never been done, people aren't being specific. Also, it doesn't really correlate to Twilight, it's not like the facts only pertain to one book. Everything they can do in the last book, they could do in the first... it just wasn't revealed yet. But ok, I'm fine with playing along, as long as the OP states that we should only use things known about the characters up to a certain movie/book.

For example. If you say The Cullen's vs. Blade, but fail to mention that we should only use "The Cullen's" from Newmoon... you're not being specific because without that distinction of " the New Moon Cullen's", the battle would include Bella as a Vampire and Renesmee.

Originally posted by marwash22
I don't have an attitude. If the way i phrase things comes off as such, it should be noted that, it is not my intention. I really don't see how anything i have written is any different in tone than what other's have written. You're making it seem like I'm sitting at home banging my head against the desk and keyboard 'cause I'm pissed someone is disagreeing with me... not the case, I just defend my position. Lighten up!

Ok, thats fine about the being specific part. However, it has never been done, people aren't being specific. Also, it doesn't really correlate to Twilight, it's not like the facts only pertain to one book. Everything they can do in the last book, they could do in the first... it just wasn't revealed yet. But ok, I'm fine with playing along, as long as the OP states that we should only use things known about the characters up to a certain movie/book.

For example. If you say The Cullen's vs. Blade, but fail to mention that we should only use "The Cullen's" from Newmoon... you're not being specific because without that distinction of " the New Moon Cullen's", the battle would include Bella as a Vampire and Renesmee.

facepalm2

we dont use the books period get that through your head this solely movie version nothing more nothing less you bn told repeatedly and yet you continue to reference the books... and what you assume will be mention in the future movie.
STOP DOING THAT!! 😠

@ Placidity

now your gonna make me watch the movie just to find that one moment.

Originally posted by Wild Shadow

@ Placidity

now your gonna make me watch the movie just to find that one moment.

I think you'll be disappointed 😛

Originally posted by Placidity
I think you'll be disappointed 😛

i am researching now starting with one.
tv_horror

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
facepalm2

we dont use the books period get that through your head this solely movie version nothing more nothing less you bn told repeatedly and yet you continue to reference the books... and what you assume will be mention in the future movie.

STOP DOING THAT!! 😠

You are failing to see the logic in it. It's not an assumption, nor is it my opinion. I have read all the books (this is how i know it's gay). You clearly haven't read the books because if you had, you would know that, everything that has happened in the first two books, happened in the first two movies... why would that change for the next two movies? 😕

And you still haven't explained the following... how does it make sense that facts from the book, can't be used when the books are EXACTLY THE SAME AS THE MOVIES! Please explain how that makes sense. And then, even if you do rationalize it to the point it makes sense to you, I'll just resume the debate after the last movie comes out and then you won't be able to deny anything.

this is were you are wrong i also read the books i sped read through them to see where the movie was going so i wouldnt waste my time after new moon.. i wanted bella to end up with jacob but sadly that is never to happen iirc bella's daughter will end up with jacob the native wolf boy... 📖 🤓

you really need to stop with the assumptions and insulting the ppl..

P.s. it only took me a few hours if that i am that fast at reading

I only saw the stuff from blade vs twilight and see this as a stomp for twilight.

Originally posted by marwash22
Oh... and then there's the whole part where if a Predator think they are outmatched, it will set off a friggin nuke... so even if by chance the Cullen's don't get raped, this will end in a draw 'cause everyone will die.

In all the predator movies I seen, none of the explosions were close to the equivalent of a nuke, they can probably make one, but I haven't seen one and besides they have to activate it first which leaves them exposed from their invisibility.

Originally posted by marwash22
Dude, seriously... wtf are you talking about? That acid crap burns through steel upon impact. Have you even read the Twilight books, or at least done some research on the vamps from Twilight? It takes almost a week to regen from losing a limb. Plus, How are they gonna regen when they will get vaporized to dust by those energy beams grenades the predator has.

since when do the Cullen's carry guns?

Super speed doesn't mean shit in this fight when you consider their opponents are just as durable as they are. Twilight vamps are stronger, but they don't have claws and they can't rip apart an alien.

I'm a goddamn truth teller. I think logically about the characters before i type. Every advantage Twilight vamps had in the other threads is either non existent or irrelevant. And once again, i phucking hate Twilight so i was never slurping them, i just used facts to determine the winner. Facts dictate that Aliens and Predators will annihilate the Cullen's.

I can't exactly remember how much power the predator's weapons have shown, but that would expose them either way for one of the twifags attacks, but it probably would against them.

They don't carry guns it was an example to show they're more durable... which they are.

Super speed would mean a lot in a fight when your opponent is just as durable as you are and it means a lot more when they're not.

You hate Twilight but I'm taking it you read the books as much as you love to refer to them, something seems wrong there hmm

Originally posted by marwash22
@ Robtard... you're really living up to that name, btw.

Speed is indeed a factor, but if you would read correctly, i already explained that Speed doesn't mean shit, when your opponent is invisible.

You can still slightly see the preds while they're invisible and if they use their weapons once they're exposed, either out goes the invisibility or the attack/weapon drawn always causes their invisibility field problems reacting making them see able for a short while and getting blood on them or their weapons wouldn't help either. Their best chance is the elder to hide somewhere far away and use his cannon.

Originally posted by Robtard
How often do the Xenomorphs spit acid as a weapon adn with pinpoint precision vs how many times do they rely on their claws, inner-mouth and tail as a weapon? Exactly.

Also, see: Speed.

Not often, only when its the one specific type of xenomorph that can spit acid ermm

I can't remember if they did it in AvP:R but the dog form should become a weaker but faster runner form of the xenomorphs, pretty much extremely worthless aside from bleeding everywhere, but then again they can be killed without drawing blood.

the elder predator had his motion sensor adhesive tech that sliced the aliens in the sewer... i see that doing the same to the twinkle f@gs

@ Spadeking

How can you hate something without understanding it? This notion that since i read the Twilight books, i must like them, is asinine. I read the books and therefore, i know they're whack. Anyone who says Twilight is gay, but hasn't read the books or watched the movies, is a moron.

Also, my love for vampire and werewolves trumps the overall lameness of the Twilight series.

i dont need to read superman comics to know how much i utterly hate superman and his last movie and call it trash..

also you can see something and make an educated guess or assumption and be all like that is massively gay..

bye the way..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7pvebaJbpM

hmm.. a guy with his underwear hanging out hands on hips spit curl and pretty boy face he seems niave as all hell also has a slight messiah type pose.. hmm definitely gay all this from a single poster or 30 second clip.. hmm movie is going suck harder then a guy at a truck stop stall

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
i dont need to read superman comics to know how much i utterly hate superman and his last movie and call it trash..

also you can see something and make an educated guess and be all like that is massively gay..

bye the way..
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T7pvebaJbpM

I'm not even gonna get into how flawed that commercial is.

Originally posted by marwash22
you missed the point... you watched the Superman movie, correct? And after you watched it, you formulated the idea that, it's trash. You didn't just look at the cover of the dvd or watch the trailer and come up with that opinion; if you did, you're a moron.

I'm not even gonna get into how flawed that commercial is.

i already formulated an idea of what the movie was going to be like i then watched it and i wasnt disappointed it was confirmed that it was trash..

also if an army of ppl say something sucks there must be a bases for such a prevailing view.

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
you need to stop insulting ppl and calling them names b/c they dont agree with you...

However, when did i insult you? If someone formulates an opinion before they even have first hand experience with the subject material, that person is either a moron, closeminded, or a bigot.

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
i already formulated an idea of what the movie was going to be like i then watched it and i wasnt disappointed it was confirmed that it was trash..

If you had the opinion that Superman Returns was horrible, but never actually watched it to confirm your suspicion, that would make you a moron because you have no evidence to support the notion. The moron comment doesn't apply to you since you did in fact watch the movie.

Originally posted by Wild Shadow
also if an army of ppl say something sucks there must be a bases for such a prevailing view.