Originally posted by Quiero Mota
June of 2010:http://www.urbanswirl.com/news/opinion/2514-woman-charged-with-adultery.html
So as you can see, adultery crimes are still enforced and are far from being Blue Laws.
So they can get married, but not carryout the sexual act?
C'mon, where's the sense in that? It can be logically deduced that gay marriage is anti-Biblical. Unless you believe Leviticus can actually be "interpreted" to mean "Gays can get married, but...uh, they just can't do it once they get married.".
What about people who are honestly Bible-believers and genuinely don't support gay marriage for the sole reason that the Bible says so? They DO exist, you know. Do you have more respect for them, then blatant haters who just hide behind Leviticus?
Fair enough.
Hey, I'm just saying if you're going to hide behind the bible, then show where it says it explicitly. But I do see your point.
Again, using Leviticus as the reason is BS for most people, at least Christians; it also supports my belief that they're just haters and intolerant of difference; not holy-rollers. Leviticus names many a thing that's an abomination and/or sin in the eyes of God, from eating selfish, cutting your beard, wearing multiply types of cloth, growing more than two crops etc. Yet we don't see mother-****ers ranting about people who eat shrimp cocktails and shave.
I've yet to meet one that I believed was genuine, but yes, I would have if that were the case. I also would have more respect for the ones that hide behind the bible if they just came out and said "I just don't like ****", "I find gays gross" etc and not scapegoated the bible.