Thor VS Thanos

Originally posted by amnesia
^ blood and thunder was a long thanos/Thor wank fest, it's just a lot of PIS.

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
and all the arguments that Thanos is too durable are null and void as we have seen Masterson Thor smash the shit out of an IG amped Thanos. meaning that without the amp, a more powerful and stronger Thor Odinson, when compared to masterson, would pound Thanos to a bloody pulp.

Originally posted by h1a8
This is not about symbolic meanings that comics portray. Of course comics portray Thanos being more powerful than Thor. But this a forum fight. How could Thanos win if Thor is fighting at his best? It is dumb and lazy to say "Well the comics portrays X being more powerful than Y thus X wins in the forum fight as well." This ignores the possibility of Y doing tactics here not shown in that fight or Y not being shown to be fighting at his best there.

What the hell are you talking about here with the energized state? Nonsense!

Thor can block and duck punches and bolts and counter them with his own attacks. Just because someone has gotten hit in comics doesn't mean they will get hit here. Fighting at the best of one's ability is the rule here. With that said, yes Thor could be hit by Thanos punches but Thanos can also be hit by Thor's hammer shots as well. Adding in the fact that Thor can send back Thanos energy attacks at greater intensity to seriously harm Thanos is why I give this fight a split (or close to a split).

I agree that if Thor lost his hammer then Thanos beats him easily. Thor fighting at his best shouldn't throw the hammer at all. If he does then it is over for him.

and when thanos gets hit with the hammer, this is what will happen

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
Thor lays the smackdown hammer on Thanos

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

😛

funny how the thanos supports keep on claiming that Thanos is way more powerful yet when presented with arguments backed with evidence all they have is "NUH UH!!!"

they wont acknowledge Thor's power and that he has what it takes to takeout Thanos. as show, A weaker masterson thor was able to almost kill an IG amped Thanos.

Originally posted by Nihilist
Poor excuse Kris. Youre a joke, seeing as a more more powerfull Odinson with the power gem could only make Thanos nose bleed a bit and couldnt even beat a weaker Thanos with the Things help, only retards regard any of the heroes showing against Thanos w/IG as credible when the heroes did better than the abstracts, anybody with half a brain who read the text in which it says Thanos was putting on a show for Death making look like he was in danger, therefore trying to impress her.

and here we go agin with the "a weaker thanos beat the shit out of thor and thing"

but i have a "a weaker masterson thor beat the shit out of an ig amped thanos"

see how that works?

and yes, thanos was putting a show but he didn't expect to get his ass kicked by Thor.

if you were infinitly durable, would anything actually hurt you? the answer is no, but it was clear that Thanos was hammer smashed by Thor. meaning? Thor can put Thanos down.

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
and here we go agin with the "a weaker thanos beat the shit out of thor and thing"

but i have a "a weaker masterson thor beat the shit out of an ig amped thanos"

see how that works?

and yes, thanos was putting a show but he didn't expect to get his ass kicked by Thor.

if you were infinitly durable, would anything actually hurt you? the answer is no, but it was clear that Thanos was hammer smashed by Thor. meaning? Thor can put Thanos down.

Originally posted by h1a8
This is not about symbolic meanings that comics portray. Of course comics portray Thanos being more powerful than Thor. But this a forum fight. How could Thanos win if Thor is fighting at his best? It is dumb and lazy to say "Well the comics portrays X being more powerful than Y thus X wins in the forum fight as well." This ignores the possibility of Y doing tactics here not shown in that fight or Y not being shown to be fighting at his best there.

What the hell are you talking about here with the energized state? Nonsense!

Thor can block and duck punches and bolts and counter them with his own attacks. Just because someone has gotten hit in comics doesn't mean they will get hit here. Fighting at the best of one's ability is the rule here. With that said, yes Thor could be hit by Thanos punches but Thanos can also be hit by Thor's hammer shots as well. Adding in the fact that Thor can send back Thanos energy attacks at greater intensity to seriously harm Thanos is why I give this fight a split (or close to a split).

I agree that if Thor lost his hammer then Thanos beats him easily. Thor fighting at his best shouldn't throw the hammer at all. If he does then it is over for him.

It's amazing that you haven't been banned yet. You see H1 the comics gives us the evidence that we use to debate. You can't pick and choose what you want to use and what you don't. Think about it, you know who Thor is and what is powers are BECAUSE of what the comics tell us about his history and powerset correct? Thus you're okay using that as evidence, but when it comes to A beat B in comics which is JUST AS VALID EVIDENCE as the previous on panel evidence, you go nahhhh I won't use that. Sorry doesn't work that way. It's all on panel evidence that carries just as much weight as a characters history and powerset that are presented in comics

You keep on bringing up useless points about Thor doing this and Thor doing that. Fact is, you're forgetting that Thanos also now fights to the best of his ability. His shields are active right away which means Thor isn't getting past them at all, unless he use a Godblast. A Godblast that Thanos can clearly see coming as Thor needs to chant and power up before shooting. Thanos just teleports behind Thor. That is even if the Godblast you break his shields. Point is, Thanos could also TP rape Thor which has happened to Thor a number of times. Thor has an up and down record against TP assaults. Thanos is better in pretty much EVERY area that mattes in a vs confrontation…. More Durable, Stronger, better TP, better matter manipulation, better at h2h, more striking power via energy and punching, better tech etc etc. Thanos is just plain stronger and more powerful and the comics MAKE THIS CRYSTAL CLEAR. That is THE evidence we use and you can't pick and choose what you'll call evidence and what you won't. You've already lost the debate then… because I'm using ON PANEL evidence which is the highest form of evidence… you're using conjecture and throwing out on panel evidence cause you don’t like it. Sorry, you've already lost everytime once you've done that

Originally posted by Nihilist
My god you are this thick, you believe Thor could of beaten someone with the IG, the ONLY time Thor got a hits in was when Thanos was/had been engaging others, which isnt a factor in this 1v1 thread,so Thor doesnt have that luxuxry he had before meaning Thor cant match Thanos as we have seen in the past.

You know all this back and forth thing is getting old...

I get it that your arguing that Thanos would beat Thor, all i'm arguing is that Thor has what it takes to put thanos down (given that thanos is standing around there just taking it all in). Thor could put thanos down =/= Thor would beat thanos.

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
You know all this back and forth thing is getting old...

I get it that your arguing that Thanos would beat Thor, all i'm arguing is that Thor has what it takes to put thanos down (given that thanos is standing around there just taking it all in). Thor could put thanos down =/= Thor would beat thanos.

Two of us (mods) read the report from this thread. I'm not sure what the problem was but please abide by the rules.

^ probably the sheer stupidity of the thread. Gogogadgetgo is obviously trolling nihilist.

I've heard on too many occasions people saying or being under the impression that Masterson Thor dropped an Infinity Gauntlet powered Thanos to his knees. This is far from the truth, Thanos said that he dropped his power level in order to make it an even fight, which means that he turned the functions of the Gauntlet off, and squared off against the heroes under his own steam. Please whoever keeps posting that scan of Thor back-stabbing Thanos with his sneak attack should read that book again, or perhaps read the entire series over.

How in the hell would Thor hurt a guy who laughed off a combined attack from Death, Galactus, The Celestials, Stranger, Love, Hate, Chaos, Order, and a handful of other Abstracts? Please get the facts straight.

About Thanos having the ability to shift to an energized state, this has happened in the Infinity Watch when he fought against his doppleganger, and defeated it. So their fighting to the best of their abilities huh? How about if Thanos was simultaneously hitting Thor with Psi bolts, cosmic plasma punches, while also being in this energized state, and mystically amping himself?

Thanos would beat Thor up, like The Big Show would beat up Pee Wee Herman.

Originally posted by Stoic
I've heard on too many occasions people saying or being under the impression that Masterson Thor dropped an Infinity Gauntlet powered Thanos to his knees. This is far from the truth, Thanos said that he dropped his power level in order to make it an even fight, which means that he turned the functions of the Gauntlet off, and squared off against the heroes under his own steam. Please whoever keeps posting that scan of Thor back-stabbing Thanos with his sneak attack should read that book again, or perhaps read the entire series over.

How in the hell would Thor hurt a guy who laughed off a combined attack from Death, Galactus, The Celestials, Stranger, Love, Hate, Chaos, Order, and a handful of other Abstracts? Please get the facts straight.

About Thanos having the ability to shift to an energized state, this has happened in the Infinity Watch when he fought against his doppleganger, and defeated it. So their fighting to the best of their abilities huh? How about if Thanos was simultaneously hitting Thor with Psi bolts, cosmic plasma punches, while also being in this energized state, and mystically amping himself?

Thanos would beat Thor up, like The Big Show would beat up Pee Wee Herman.

He is Thor.

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
well, if it were a poll, lets count, we have rage, gogo, h1, lord...now thats 4...and thanos supporters are less than 10..dear me, your wrong

Originally posted by h1a8
You are not debating correctly. You just can't reply to someone's post and say Thanos stomps. You must explain how or refute my reply.

With that said, Thor can probably at least split here with his defense capabilities.

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
and all the arguments that Thanos is too durable are null and void as we have seen Masterson Thor smash the shit out of an IG amped Thanos. meaning that without the amp, a more powerful and stronger Thor Odinson, when compared to masterson, would pound Thanos to a bloody pulp.

And thats a really bad argument.Because now your saying that weakest thor could beat IG...

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
and when thanos gets hit with the hammer, this is what will happen

funny how the thanos supports keep on claiming that Thanos is way more powerful yet when presented with arguments backed with evidence all they have is "NUH UH!!!"

they wont acknowledge Thor's power and that he has what it takes to takeout Thanos. as show, A weaker masterson thor was able to almost kill an IG amped Thanos.

http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://media.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/704901/80686348.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.ebaumsworld.com/pictures/view/80686348/&usg=__mhnotIIeoXYCd2xQ4BpHsEOSz_Y=&h=628&w=478&sz=55&hl=en&start=0&sig2=I2L64jGzIq9TER-mHjApAg&tbnid=lAPYr7A0qtJXSM:&tbnh=139&tbnw=106&ei=9PFqTJX9B4K88gb22qjqAQ&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dthe%2Bfail%2Bis%2Bstrong%2Bin%2Bthis%2Bone.%26hl%3Den%26biw%3D1362%26bih%3D562%26gbv%3D2%26tbs%3Disch:1&itbs=1&iact=rc&dur=146&oei=9PFqTJX9B4K88gb22qjqAQ&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=23&ved=1t:429,r:3,s:0&tx=53&ty=55

Originally posted by Nihilist
All h1a8 arguments on Thor blocking/absorbing Thanos blasts and sending them back at Thanos 10x are null and Void as we saw Thor w/power gem struggle to block/absorb a Thanos blast and redirect it back as it was too powerfull

Thor has many times easily absorbed energy attacks and sent them back. Stating times he struggled is lowballing. Characters fight at their best. Thor had no problem shielding himself from Destroyer, whose beam>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Thanos beams.

Originally posted by amnesia
^ probably the sheer stupidity of the thread. Gogogadgetgo is obviously trolling nihilist.

This is a debate. If people can't post without flaming or accusing people of trolling, then they shouldn't post.

Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
It's amazing that you haven't been banned yet. You see H1 the comics gives us the evidence that we use to debate. You can't pick and choose what you want to use and what you don't. Think about it, you know who Thor is and what is powers are BECAUSE of what the comics tell us about his history and powerset correct? Thus you're okay using that as evidence, but when it comes to A beat B in comics which is JUST AS VALID EVIDENCE as the previous on panel evidence, you go nahhhh I won't use that. Sorry doesn't work that way. It's all on panel evidence that carries just as much weight as a characters history and powerset that are presented in comics

You keep on bringing up useless points about Thor doing this and Thor doing that. Fact is, you're forgetting that Thanos also now fights to the best of his ability. His shields are active right away which means Thor isn't getting past them at all, unless he use a Godblast. A Godblast that Thanos can clearly see coming as Thor needs to chant and power up before shooting. Thanos just teleports behind Thor. That is even if the Godblast you break his shields.

Point is, Thanos could also TP rape Thor which has happened to Thor a number of times. Thor has an up and down record against TP assaults. Thanos is better in pretty much EVERY area that mattes in a vs confrontation…. More Durable, Stronger, better TP, better matter manipulation, better at h2h, more striking power via energy and punching, better tech etc etc. Thanos is just plain stronger and more powerful and the comics MAKE THIS CRYSTAL CLEAR. That is THE evidence we use and you can't pick and choose what you'll call evidence and what you won't. You've already lost the debate then… because I'm using ON PANEL evidence which is the highest form of evidence… you're using conjecture and throwing out on panel evidence cause you don’t like it. Sorry, you've already lost everytime once you've done that

Lastly, what you called on panel evidence isn't evidence (but rather on panel events) if it goes against forum rules. That is, showings of a character not performing at their best as shown before. If Spider-man can dodge bullets and many fast foes strikes then using a panel evidence where he gets hit by a slower moving enemy is LOWBALLING and thus is not evidence towards the FORUM FIGHT!

Originally posted by Badabing
All I see is Gogogadetgo debating his opinion. I see Nihilist name calling. And your post isn't helping.

This is a debate. If people can't post without flaming or accusing people of trolling, then they shouldn't post.

And all the evidence I have seen provided is a one time feat(soul sucking) which I asked you a question about and you replyed it needed to be done at least 3 times and throwing thanos blasts back at him x10 which I have not seen at all.Also somehow about a weaker thor almost killing thanos with IG which is just a dense argument.Since 1): It was a sneak attack and thanos was not aware of him and 2): He didn't even do anything to him besides knock him down.

Here i'll actually post your PM.

The general rule is a character should have done the feat at least 3 times under their own power with no amps, outside help, artifacts, etc.

Originally posted by Stoic
I've heard on too many occasions people saying or being under the impression that Masterson Thor dropped an Infinity Gauntlet powered Thanos to his knees. This is far from the truth, Thanos said that he dropped his power level in order to make it an even fight, which means that he turned the functions of the Gauntlet off, and squared off against the heroes under his own steam . Please whoever keeps posting that scan of Thor back-stabbing Thanos with his sneak attack should read that book again, or perhaps read the entire series over.

Under his own steam? come now...i suggest you take your own advise and re-read the issue..or better yet, here you go

now, tell me, where it says thanos using "HIS OWN STEAM"?

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Except for the part that it was a sneak attack and then thanos one-shotted him.

and? your point? it still doesnt change the fact that Thanos got creamed by Thor.

Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
and? your point? it still doesnt change the fact that Thanos got creamed by Thor.

It was a sneak attack.It would be the same as you coming to behind me and tazing me.You stunned me.Then I take out a shotgun and blast your head off.I would one-shot you.

Thor is the tazer.Thanos is the shotgun.Do the math.