Originally posted by gogogadgetgoWhere was it stated he was almost killed unless you have on panel proof of someone stating he was almost killed stop with the lies.
And yet Thanos did have all the powers of the IG save the sensory powers, and yet again, we have, on panel proof that Masterson Thor nearly killed Thanos.how do you go around that? i suppose by sprouting out fictitious arguments that Thanos was play acting it all even if he had no idea what would happen next. now, thats a flawed argument.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
And yet Thanos did have all the powers of the IG save the sensory powers, and yet again, we have, on panel proof that Masterson Thor nearly killed Thanos.how do you go around that? i suppose by sprouting out fictitious arguments that Thanos was play acting it all even if he had no idea what would happen next. now, thats a flawed argument.
He wasn't even close to killing Thanos. :-/ Thanos turned him into glass.
The narrative that you're seeing is Warlock (or was it Mephisto?) hoping that Masterson would finish Thanos off. Even tho it was never shown that they could achieve this even if he struck.
Thanos FELL when he got hit by the hammer. He showed no injuries after the hit. Stating that he was "nearly killed" is an exaggeration (heck, "exaggeration" is an understatement).
DS fell when he tripped down stairs. Does that mean the stairs nearly killed him?
Originally posted by thanos-prime
Exactly "most powerful and most DURABLE" which is why the scene can be interpenetrated no other way than he was putting on a show.
or it can be interpreted that Thor actually had the strength and power to do what he did. Which was why Thanos' brother commented on Thor being their trump card or something like that.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Stating that he was "nearly killed" is an exaggeration (heck, "exaggeration" is an understatement).
actually yes, its an exaggeration i admit. but still, making someone with the IG feel your attack is impressive non the less.
i just used the phrase "nearly killed" as response to black boltz "nah uh" argument.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoor it could be that he didn't have the power to do it and his brothers comment refers to when then sneak attack happened and thanos was floored for some time giving them an opportunity to remove the gauntlet your interpretation makes no sense while mine does.
or it can be interpreted that Thor actually had the strength and power to do what he did. Which was why Thanos' brother commented on Thor being their trump card or something like that.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoThe feeling his attack could be attributed to him putting on a show for death.
actually yes, its an exaggeration i admit. but still, making someone with the IG feel your attack is impressive non the less.i just used the phrase "nearly killed" as response to black boltz "nah uh" argument.
Originally posted by thanos-prime
or it could be that he didn't have the power to do it and his brothers comment refers to when then sneak attack happened and thanos was floored for some time giving them an opportunity to remove the gauntlet your interpretation makes no sense while mine does.
but thor wasn't going for the IG was he? he was going for the kill. And on panel we see Thanos seriously hurt and on his face. my interpretation actually more sense than yours as it is backed by on panel evidence. yours on the other hand are pure assumptions.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
actually yes, its an exaggeration i admit. but still, making someone with the IG feel your attack is impressive non the less.i just used the phrase "nearly killed" as response to black boltz "nah uh" argument.
Thanos' durability during his little show was dubious at best. Like I said, Spiderman made him reel, Cyclops was affecting him, etc.
Past and present showings of Thanos has shown his durability to be beyond the top tiers' ability to harm. Heck Thor with WM (arguable, I know) AND the power gem could barely keep up with him. Surfer has always been punked by him, etc.
The IG has limitless power. And as such is beyond any character that isn't an abstract to harm or affect. Any kind of non-abstract character "affecting" an IG wielder that is being serious is more akin to PIS than it is an "impressive" feat. The only way the above feat makes any kind of sense is more due to playing/pretending by the IG wielder than it is any kind of measurable feat.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoYour interpretation is laughable at best your actually trying to claim he had the power to hurt a thanos with the ig and mine makes less sense? and seeing as after he is grounded that's where the comic ends and in the next he stops playing around they wouldn't have a chance to go for it would they? and the hurt on his face could be his pride more than anything thor did to him. Im done arguing with you as you are obvisouly wrong and won't admit it.
but thor wasn't going for the IG was he? he was going for the kill. And on panel we see Thanos seriously hurt and on his face. my interpretation actually more sense than yours as it is backed by on panel evidence. yours on the other hand are pure assumptions.
Originally posted by thanos-prime
The feeling his attack could be attributed to him putting on a show for death.
he was putting a show to impress death, but never was it mentioned that he would act being hurt. he claimed that he would still poses infinite power hence giving the heroes a point something something percent of victory.
Clearly you underestimate thor's power. he has been show to bust open exitars dome, and my all time favorite resist infinite gravity feat. Its not that hard to believe that thor can really hurt Thanos.
As it still stands, on panel, i'm right and yours are just claims to degrade the feat. Unless otherwise you can show me on panel proof saying Thanos was play acting.
And again, without the IG, Thanos would be reeling in pain when hit with such force.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoEven with the power gem being the only one working he has enough power to snap his fingers and they would all die so how else would he put on a show? they certainly shouldn't be able to hurt him. he stated he was putting on a show the factors of the fight make more sense in my favor not your so your wrong and im right. and no he wouldn't be realing in pain as the durablility boost comes from the power gem which is the only one he was using.
he was putting a show to impress death, but never was it mentioned that he would act being hurt. he claimed that he would still poses infinite power hence giving the heroes a point something something percent of victory.Clearly you underestimate thor's power. he has been show to bust open exitars dome, and my all time favorite resist infinite gravity feat. Its not that hard to believe that thor can really hurt Thanos.
As it still stands, on panel, i'm right and yours are just claims to degrade the feat. Unless otherwise you can show me on panel proof saying Thanos was play acting.
And again, without the IG, Thanos would be reeling in pain when hit with such force.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Thanos' durability during his little show was dubious at best. Like I said, Spiderman made him reel, Cyclops was affecting him, etc.Past and present showings of Thanos has shown his durability to be beyond the top tiers' ability to harm. Heck Thor with WM (arguable, I know) AND the power gem could barely keep up with him. Surfer has always been punked by him, etc.
The IG has limitless power. And as such is beyond any character that isn't an abstract to harm or affect. Any kind of non-abstract character "affecting" an IG wielder that is being serious is more akin to PIS than it is an "impressive" feat. The only way the above feat makes any kind of sense is more due to playing/pretending by the IG wielder than it is any kind of measurable feat.
Cyclops did nothing actually, and spider man is AWESOME!
and yet Thor hurt an IG amped thanos. A non amped Thanos would definitely get seriously hurt by such an attack. Thanos is indeed very durable, but to claim that Thor wouldn't be able to harm him is laughable.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoyour explanation is spider-man is awesome? And yet his history contradicts that such as going toe to toe with pg amped thor and smiling at his blows.
Cyclops did nothing actually, and spider man is AWESOME!and yet Thor hurt an IG amped thanos. A non amped Thanos would definitely get seriously hurt by such an attack. Thanos is indeed very durable, but to claim that Thor wouldn't be able to harm him is laughable.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
Cyclops did nothing actually, and spider man is AWESOME!and yet Thor hurt an IG amped thanos. A non amped Thanos would definitely get seriously hurt by such an attack. Thanos is indeed very durable, but to claim that Thor wouldn't be able to harm him is laughable.
Like I said, his durability was dubious during that showing. :-/
I would make the argument for ANYone wielding the IG. Heck, Aunt May wielding the IG shouldn't be affected by Thor's hits. Any kind of claim that Thor would be able to hurt an IF wielder w/o the wielder wishing it to be so is the laughable one. :-/
Never made the argument that Thor would never be unable to hurt Thanos. My argument is that it has never been shown that he could (w/o some sort of amp) and Thanos has been shown to be unaffected from attacks by characters at the level of Thor.
Originally posted by thanos-prime
Even with the power gem being the only one working he has enough power to snap his fingers and they would all die so how else would he put on a show? they certainly shouldn't be able to hurt him. he stated he was putting on a show the factors of the fight make more sense in my favor not your so your wrong and im right. and no he wouldn't be realing in pain as the durablility boost comes from the power gem which is the only one he was using.
see, that's what i'm talking about. all you guys do are claim some crap arguments pulled out from who knows where and not bakcing it up with anything.
on panel, Thor smacked IG thanos, on panel, IG thanos was on the ground, on panel, Thanos was seriously hurt.
then you go saying "he's play acting, yeah, thats it" without a shred of proof or anythihng.
as already stated, he'd fight them to impress deaht and show her his valor or something. never was it stated that he'd act hurt and that he'd act to lose. never!
not one shred of evidence. all "NAH UH!!" please, show me something concrete.
if you want i can pst the entire issue 4 of ig and lets read through them one at a time to fine the "yup i'm play acting" argument that you keep bringing up. as clearly it isnt the case.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoWow your thick if you can't see the simple factors of the fight.
see, that's what i'm talking about. all you guys do are claim some crap arguments pulled out from who knows where and not bakcing it up with anything.on panel, Thor smacked IG thanos, on panel, IG thanos was on the ground, on panel, Thanos was seriously hurt.
then you go saying "he's play acting, yeah, thats it" without a shred of proof or anythihng.
as already stated, he'd fight them to impress deaht and show her his valor or something. never was it stated that he'd act hurt and that he'd act to lose. never!
not one shred of evidence. all "NAH UH!!" please, show me something concrete.
if you want i can pst the entire issue 4 of ig and lets read through them one at a time to fine the "yup i'm play acting" argument that you keep bringing up. as clearly it isnt the case.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Like I said, his durability was dubious during that showing. :-/I would make the argument for ANYone wielding the IG. Heck, Aunt May wielding the IG shouldn't be affected by Thor's hits. Any kind of claim that Thor would be able to hurt an IF wielder w/o the wielder wishing it to be so is the laughable one. :-/
Never made the argument that Thor would never be unable to hurt Thanos. My argument is that it has never been shown that he could (w/o some sort of amp) and Thanos has been shown to be unaffected from attacks by characters at the level of Thor.
And we have evidence that Thor can dish out enough to make Thanos cry uncle. I have never been under the impression that Thor would beat thanos. All i'm arguing is that Thor can and will put up a fight and give Thanos a run for his money. Thanos would win all of the time but not as easily as many claim it to be.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoYes thor could put up a good fight but your basing it on some insane reasoning.
And we have evidence that Thor can dish out enough to make Thanos cry uncle. I have never been under the impression that Thor would beat thanos. All i'm arguing is that Thor can and will put up a fight and give Thanos a run for his money. Thanos would win all of the time but not as easily as many claim it to be.