Originally posted by thanos-prime
Wow your thick if you can't see the simple factors of the fight.
and all you have are assumptions and speculations trying to demean the feat. while i have on panel proof at my side
anyways, this is standard thanos vs thor, hence when hit like that, Thanos would be eating dirt again.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoSorry but 1 feat vs a dozen doesn't determine an outcome.
and all you have are assumptions and speculations trying to demean the feat. while i have on panel proof at my sideanyways, this is standard thanos vs thor, hence when hit like that, Thanos would be eating dirt again.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
see, that's what i'm talking about. all you guys do are claim some crap arguments pulled out from who knows where and not bakcing it up with anything.on panel, Thor smacked IG thanos, on panel, IG thanos was on the ground, on panel, Thanos was seriously hurt.
It was never shown that Thanos was seriously hurt. He fell, that's it.
We make that claim because no other claim would make sense. It is beyond Thor or any non-abstract character to be any kind of threat to an IG-user, Thanos or otherwise. And using the IG feat as any kind of conclusive evidence shows a complete and rampart disregard for logical reasoning. :-/
Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
And we have evidence that Thor can dish out enough to make Thanos cry uncle.
No you don't.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
I have never been under the impression that Thor would beat thanos. All i'm arguing is that Thor can and will put up a fight and give Thanos a run for his money. Thanos would win all of the time but not as easily as many claim it to be.
He'd put up a slightly better fight than the Surfer would. But that's not saying much.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
No you don't.He'd put up a slightly better fight than the Surfer would. But that's not saying much.
surfer is the ultimate thanos jobber. how can someone like surfer who is on par with Thor get one shotted by Odin when we have showings of Thor not getting one shotted by odin?
Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
surfer is the ultimate thanos jobber. how can someone like surfer who is on par with Thor get one shotted by Odin when we have showings of Thor not getting one shotted by odin?
Plot. I wouldn't say PIS, but simply plot. Surfer has been shown to withstand SEVERAL blows from 2 abstract level entities (clearly above Odin), yet Odin one shotted him. Does that mean Odin > Aegis/Tenebrous? Doubt it.
Sometimes, characters get hit by character that COULD logically one-shot them, but survive to keep the story going.
But I do agree. Thanos' bitchslap hand is Surfer's Kryptonite.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoHe got hit with mjolnir,hit again from being dazed,and then thor was about to hit him again.Hmmm...two hits from thor = being better then IG now?Guess thor is a cosmic.And then thor died.So thanos takes no damage then thor dying is thor owning him to you?
"just knock him down"? really? does this look like "just knocked down to you? looks more like thanos almost getting killed to me
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoToo bad he didn't lay the smack down.He layed the knock down with sneak attack.
Thats because spiderman is AWSOME!No, he wasn't acting. He was indeed putting up a show for Death, but he was man handling everyone with no one coming close to doing anything to Thanos until Thor smacked him so hard he fell flat on his face and ate dirt.
no matter how you look at it, Thanos still had infinite power and only cut his sensory powers.
and being able to smack Thanos that hard while amped by the IG is one damn awesome feat
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoNo its not.If you knocked me down and do absolutely no damage to me then I kill you did you do anything impressive?No
Sneack attack or not, and being near death or not, being able to pummel thanos flat on his face while possessing the IG is impressive.
.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoBut thanos didn't die did he?All it did was knock him down.
No that is incorrect. if i threw a mallet at your face then smacked you at your shoulders you wouldnt just be stunned. you'd be dead, so yeah, poor analogy.Thanos had infinite power, making him the most powerful and most durable SOB EVAH! If you had infinite power, it would be more like me trying to smack a 50 story building with a hammer and hoping it falls down regardless if it were a sneak attack or not.
But Thor managed to topple Thanos. That just shows how powerful Thor is and proves your "nah uh! Thanos is too powerful and would just wtf stomp thor" argument false.
How does having power affect you falling down?I could push chuck norris down and i'm pretty weak.Does this mean I am now >>>>>>>chuck norris?
Except thats not my argument.Thats straw manning.And thanos has shown to be above thor.While beating thing at the same time.As a weaker version.So according to you knocking him down is the same as beating him...guess everything that ever happened on americas funnies home videos is a fight and someone one.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoExcept I have.Any your just straw manning.
And yet you add nothing to the thread. all i've seen you do is Nah Uh! Thanos gona win" then when asked to prove a point you go "no no no! you prove it" which shows how pathetic you are. you have not disproved anything, just your "oh no it wont work coz its thanos" answer.The soul suck maybe a onetime feat, and during that feat we have thor saying why he rarely or never uses it. So, it means it is in his power set.
Claming it wont work while not having a shred of evidence to back up the claim is really disappointing. this goes for all the Thoanos supporters.
We come up with a feat that actually works and when brought to the table all you Thanos supports have is "no it wont work coz thanos is too damn powerful" and yet have no single piece of evidence to back up the claim
this is why this forum is lacking. Everything is just based on assumptions and nothing solid. And when an argument is presented backed up by evidence, it is immediately shot down with a "nuh uh" argument.
as it is, IMO, the soul suck still stands. It will work on thanos. As it has been shown to actually really work. Until someone on the Thanos camp can present actual evidence that thanos can resist Thor's soul suck. all you have are just that, arguments without proof.
As for my "masterson thor smacking IG thanos", its to prove that Thor has what it takes to hurt and takeout Thanos. He posses the strength and powerout put to defeat thanos. It maybe a cheezy move but still, having the raw power to topple an IG amped thanos is impressive.
If that not enough, Thor being able to penetrate exitar's dome is also an indication of his power. Then we have thor using pure physical strength, lifting the odin sword and throwing it with enough force to puncture a celestial again proves how powerful Thor really is.
All these proves that the People screaming spite and stomp in favor of Thanos are all mistaken. Thanos VS Thor is not spite nor will it ever be a stomp.
And I posted a quote from a mod saying that it has to be down at least 3 times.So the soul suck is an invalid argument for thor.
What won't work?The x10 throw back?Show proof of him doing this at least 3 times.If you can I concede that point.If you can't you must concede that point.
Once again please specify what feat.Soul sucking isn't valid and you have yet to provide evidence of how often thor has shot back blasts x10.
No thats you.Your just saying we are doing that even though all you are showing is thor knocking down thanos.
1): its a one time and and therefore cannot be used.I posted a quote from a mod proving this.2): Adam warlocks soul suck didn't work on him.And adams soul suck>>Thors.And its not even a valid feat for thor.SO no it does not stand.
Except he didn't take him out nor hurt him.He got hit with an enchanted hammer.He fell down.Then he tried to kill thanos.No evidence he would have.Then thanos killed him.And it was a sneak attack.Look at context.
So thats the godblast with belt of strength(which is an amp whivh thor will not have here)and an extra item that thor will not have here.Sense a pattern?
Actually it is.If you actually read their fights.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoWhen did he say he nearly lost all to thor?Thor said thanos must die.Then thor died.Not impressive at all.
yes, a show, and commenting that he nearly lost it all is an indication of his play acting. come now, you can do better than that.making up silly claims such as thanos play acting when it was clearly shown that he himself was shocked that he "nearly lost it all" is an indication that when he was fighting he wasnt faking anything.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoResorting to kill is in character.Not soul suck.Its an invalid feat.
It is not me in Thor's body, but yeah, IMO, Thor will use it. If Thor finally lost it and used it on Loki, who IMO, is a lesser threat than Thanos, when given no other options, Thor will bust it out knowing what a veil evil being Thanos is.Comes to show how little of Thor's character you know. Thor, the god of thunder, champion of asgard, the realm eternal. slayer of tens and thousands of frost giants, trolls and dark elves. So yeah, resorting to kill thanos is in Thor's character.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoHe was physically invulnerable with the power gem.It showed no indication of actual pain.Only knocking him down which(even though its not that great,bring real world physics into this)with amount of force put into the throw + the material of the hammer it would knocked down a lot of people.Not hurt though.
Thats my point. Thanos cut himself from all sensory powers if you remember. Hence, he didn't know what would happen next. if your damn omnipotent a sneak attack wouldnt mater as any attack wouldnt even make you flinch. If you were play acting, it helps to know when to act hurt etc. But Thor made Thanos real back and dropped him on his face.which leads me to believe that the blows that Thor delivered were very damn powerful to actually affect Thanos.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoProve thor nearly killed thanos.You can't.All he did was knock him down.Get this through your head.
And yet Thanos did have all the powers of the IG save the sensory powers, and yet again, we have, on panel proof that Masterson Thor nearly killed Thanos.how do you go around that? i suppose by sprouting out fictitious arguments that Thanos was play acting it all even if he had no idea what would happen next. now, thats a flawed argument.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoNo he commented that thor was their strongest player.And all he did was knock down thanos then die.
or it can be interpreted that Thor actually had the strength and power to do what he did. Which was why Thanos' brother commented on Thor being their trump card or something like that.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoExcept that wasn't my argument.You just have to provide proof.Of any sort.And you haven't.
actually yes, its an exaggeration i admit. but still, making someone with the IG feel your attack is impressive non the less.i just used the phrase "nearly killed" as response to black boltz "nah uh" argument.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoIts an interpretation!You just contridicited yourself.One interpretation can not be make more sense then the other because they are both subjective.And most people seem to think of the intrepretation that thanos was just knocked down.Because you have no proof that he was in pain.
but thor wasn't going for the IG was he? he was going for the kill. And on panel we see Thanos seriously hurt and on his face. my interpretation actually more sense than yours as it is backed by on panel evidence. yours on the other hand are pure assumptions.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoNo its not out of bounds for thor to hurt thanos.To KO him yes but he is well within the bounds to hurt.And no he wouldn't.He took an amped thors hit to the face with a smile.
he was putting a show to impress death, but never was it mentioned that he would act being hurt. he claimed that he would still poses infinite power hence giving the heroes a point something something percent of victory.Clearly you underestimate thor's power. he has been show to bust open exitars dome, and my all time favorite resist infinite gravity feat. Its not that hard to believe that thor can really hurt Thanos.
As it still stands, on panel, i'm right and yours are just claims to degrade the feat. Unless otherwise you can show me on panel proof saying Thanos was play acting.
And again, without the IG, Thanos would be reeling in pain when hit with such force.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoNo he didn't hurt him with IG.Once again he could hurt him.Thats obvious.To KO him is nonsense.
Cyclops did nothing actually, and spider man is AWESOME!and yet Thor hurt an IG amped thanos. A non amped Thanos would definitely get seriously hurt by such an attack. Thanos is indeed very durable, but to claim that Thor wouldn't be able to harm him is laughable.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoThats you.
see, that's what i'm talking about. all you guys do are claim some crap arguments pulled out from who knows where and not bakcing it up with anything.on panel, Thor smacked IG thanos, on panel, IG thanos was on the ground, on panel, Thanos was seriously hurt.
then you go saying "he's play acting, yeah, thats it" without a shred of proof or anythihng.
as already stated, he'd fight them to impress deaht and show her his valor or something. never was it stated that he'd act hurt and that he'd act to lose. never!
not one shred of evidence. all "NAH UH!!" please, show me something concrete.
if you want i can pst the entire issue 4 of ig and lets read through them one at a time to fine the "yup i'm play acting" argument that you keep bringing up. as clearly it isnt the case.
Prove he was hurt.You can't?Concession accepted.
Prove he was hurt.
What?
Please show me something concrete as I have asked before.
In IG arc is says any lesser enemy would have failed.But not thanos.He was toying with them!It should be obvious!
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoYes as easily.He didn't make him cry uncle.And you can't prove he showed pain.He would win all of them and stomp all of them.
And we have evidence that Thor can dish out enough to make Thanos cry uncle. I have never been under the impression that Thor would beat thanos. All i'm arguing is that Thor can and will put up a fight and give Thanos a run for his money. Thanos would win all of the time but not as easily as many claim it to be.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoNo he wouldn't.Because 1): It was a sneak attack and 2): People have showed you scans of thanos stopping thors hammer mid flight.So thanos could just do that again.
and all you have are assumptions and speculations trying to demean the feat. while i have on panel proof at my sideanyways, this is standard thanos vs thor, hence when hit like that, Thanos would be eating dirt again.
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoYes it is a stomp.
then we're in agreement, Thanos wins but not spite and not a stomp.Cheers!
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoI wouldn't even say that.No one under trans can last more then a minute with thanos.WIth him stomping 99% of the time.
very well then, to each his own. i still say not a stomp, but at least we're in agreement that Thor would put up a good fight. 👆
Originally posted by gogogadgetgoSurfer is a jobber to thanos.But thanos stil has shown to two shot thor in a weaker version.
surfer is the ultimate thanos jobber. how can someone like surfer who is on par with Thor get one shotted by Odin when we have showings of Thor not getting one shotted by odin?
Originally posted by gogogadgetgo👆
no truer words have ever been said 😆
Gogo is really dense isn't he... Lets break down the facts here....
1. Thor can't use a soul suck gogo.. your wet dreams have been voided by the mods. He hasn't used it 3 times and NEVER used it on somebody as strong as thanos. So you can talk all day about soul suck, but your method has been deamed not applicable
A. Lets be clear though, in no way shape or form am I worried about Thor's soul suck. In the other thread I made to laugh at you and Lordofblunder.. you admitted Warlock's Soul Suck is more powerful and more credibility than Thor's. Now WARLOCK HIMSELF has stated he didn't think the Soul Suck would work on Thanos. Game over. You have a more powerful person who knows Thanos better than ANYBODY, and who uses the soul suck MORE than Thor, not try it because he didn't think it would work. Thanks for playing.
2. You bringing up Thor doing anything to Thanos with the IG is laughable, and really makes you look like a tool. So you think Thanos can TANK WITH NO ISSUE a blast from Eternity.. Take on Abstracts and one shot them all like it nothing... yet believe M. Thor's hammer shot did a thing to him? Are you really this stupid and lack this much common sense? I mean honestly do you? Unless of course you believe Thor's hammer Thor is more powerful than anything Eternity, Celestials etc etc could dish out? Do you? lol. You don't I assume... and thus it's quite clear why that took place....
A. He was putting on a show... now when you put on a show to impress somebody and make it appear like a close battle.. one LOGICAL thing you would most certainly do is feint injury correct? One thing you would do to make it seem like you were in danger, is actually make it look like you were right? That is EXACTLY what Thanos did. You keep saying the comic sides with you and you're completly wrong. In fact, the comic sides with us. Thanos was PUTTING ON A SHOW.. that entails a wide variety of things Thanos could do to put on a show. I don't care what you think he would do.. the fact is he could do a number of things whether specifically stated or not. So when you have him shrugging off blast from abstracts and one shotting them, tanking blast from his more powerful father like they were nothing, taking MULTIPLE blows from a non-holding back PG Thor which does NOTHING to him, taking shots from IG weilding Magus like they were nothing... yet a kick from Spiderman rocks Thanos, Iron mad knocks him back, Thor knocks him down... and you go... no that is real and he wasn't faking? I mean honestly do you try and look this stupid? Honestly? No common sense tells us if NORMAL thanos takes far more with no effect how would less effect an exponentially stronger Thanos? Hmmmmm I know... because the comics tells us why... HE WAS PUTTING ON A SHOW.
Okay now that all your nonsense has been dispelled we are left with the simple facts of this match. Thanos is better in virtually EVERY area of this fight. He has clearly been protrayed as Thor superior on multiple occasions. This thread is on the verge of spite because of how much more powerful Thanos is. However, you can continue to look like the laughing stock of the forum my all means and continue.
Well...
I guess we can close this thread with us agreeing to disagree...
I think Thor has the goods to give Thanos one hell of a fight sans Soul Suck; I keep bringing up Soul Suck btw just to screw with some of you that seemingly have this notion that Thanos is some unbeatable badazz who can only lose against characters Depowered Tyrant level or above...
I honestly think Thor has to goods to fight him hard; Mjolnir can counter his energy attacks and hurl them back at him amplified and Thor is strong and skilled enough (IMHO of course) to fight him hand to hand...
Yeah, I think Soul Suck would work on Thanos until proven otherwise (Warlocks SPECULATION does NOT make Thanos resisting this attack a certainty)...but I fully realize that this isnt in Thors character to use...but like I said, I just hit you Thanos worshippers with this because it "might" be true and I know the idea that you guys idol gets one-shotted by Thor pisses some of you off to the high hells...
And if you read the entire "Infinity Trilogy," it is implied continuously that Thor is on Thanos's level; time and time again, you see the hero's efforts against Thanos being ineffective...until Thor does something to him...then it has effect.
But anyway, I am getting sucked back into this argument that we've gone full circle in atleast 3-4 times already...I think we just agree to disagree.
Originally posted by TheLordofMurderOr we can close it agreeing thanos wins.
Well...I guess we can close this thread with us agreeing to disagree...
I think Thor has the goods to give Thanos one hell of a fight sans Soul Suck; I keep bringing up Soul Suck btw just to screw with some of you that seemingly have this notion that Thanos is some unbeatable badazz who can only lose against characters Depowered Tyrant level or above...
I honestly think Thor has to goods to fight him hard; Mjolnir can counter his energy attacks and hurl them back at him amplified and Thor is strong and skilled enough (IMHO of course) to fight him hand to hand...
Yeah, I think Soul Suck would work on Thanos until [b]proven
otherwise (Warlocks SPECULATION does NOT make Thanos resisting this attack a certainty)...but I fully realize that this isnt in Thors character to use...but like I said, I just hit you Thanos worshippers with this because it "might" be true and I know the idea that you guys idol gets one-shotted by Thor pisses some of you off to the high hells...And if you read the entire "Infinity Trilogy," it is implied continuously that Thor is on Thanos's level; time and time again, you see the hero's efforts against Thanos being ineffective...until Thor does something to him...then it has effect.
But anyway, I am getting sucked back into this argument that we've gone full circle in atleast 3-4 times already...I think we just agree to disagree. [/B]
And soul suck isn't even a valid option.But thanos can lose to less then DP tyrant.
Except for the part where thanos can two shot him.
But we know its not.Warlock never did it but he knows thanos better than thanos does.And he says it wouldn't work.What does that tell you?
Like when?In gauntlet he knocked him down...in war he did nothing and in crusade he did nothing.Thor has never been shown to be on thanos level.
Or we can agree thanos wins 😛
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
Gogo is really dense isn't he... Lets break down the facts here....
He was putting on a show... now when you put on a show to impress somebody and make it appear like a close battle.. one LOGICAL thing you would most certainly do is feint injury correct? One thing you would do to make it seem like you were in danger, is actually make it look like you were right? That is EXACTLY what Thanos did. You keep saying the comic sides with you and you're completly wrong. In fact, the comic sides with us. Thanos was PUTTING ON A SHOW.. that entails a wide variety of things Thanos could do to put on a show. I don't care what you think he would do.. the fact is he could do a number of things whether specifically stated or not. So when you have him shrugging off blast from abstracts and one shotting them, tanking blast from his more powerful father like they were nothing, taking MULTIPLE blows from a non-holding back PG Thor which does NOTHING to him, taking shots from IG weilding Magus like they were nothing... yet a kick from Spiderman rocks Thanos, Iron mad knocks him back, Thor knocks him down... and you go... no that is real and he wasn't faking? I mean honestly do you try and look this stupid? Honestly? No common sense tells us if NORMAL thanos takes far more with no effect how would less effect an exponentially stronger Thanos? Hmmmmm I know... because the comics tells us why... HE WAS PUTTING ON A SHOW.
You realize it's a comic, right ? Most things don't make sense in a comic. Stop over analyzing the fight. Masterson Thor knocked Thanos down twice, with Mjolnir and without Mjolnir, end of story.
He wanted to impress Death, sure, but he definitely did not put on a show. Not in the least. He was having fun, but putting on a show ? Nope.
(By the way, repeating it constantly and using capital letters doesn't make it true.)
