Originally posted by gogogadgetgoDamn those were the good ole' days! Nowadays the writers would have Thor attack Galan with only lightning lol!
still just a bunch of yada yada with no on panel proof or evidence. OP didnt ask for a wall of text. he asked for proof and on panel evidence that shows Thanos' feats that put him above Thor in terms of strength and blasting power.i'm sure you can come up with some and post them...
I'll start, here's the age old yet still canon Godblast used on Galactus, which, according to Galactus himself, would have killed him
your turn
💃
Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
thanos is just stronger despite feats
we all know Odin is stronger than thor and odin has next to nothing of strength feats
technically, without any amping and just their own natural strength, Thor would WTF pawn Odin. Odin only becomes stronger than Thor when amping with the Odin force
Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Ok Thanosi...explain this then:During the Blood and Thunder arc, Thor only used the Power Gem subconsciously, and when he did so it was clearly stated on panel each time...
So with that said, no mention of Thor tapping into the Power Gem ocurred during the Thor/Thanos fight and Thanos was losing...he had to run off and get tech to subdue Thor as he apparently couldnt beat him under his own power...
So explain to me again how Thanos treats heralds like children?
You are honestly really slow.. You talk about me not remembering things correctly.... Thanos knockdown thor more times than vice versa. Thor lands more blows, Thanos more blasts. The key is... Thanos knockdown thor and THROUGH A METAL floor. As we all know knockdowns especially driven through a floor count way more than simple hits to the face. Thor HAS NEVER dispatched of the people he did, like he did, in that arc. It is clear to anybody with a brain cell he was amped and the drawing on it. Not only does it not make you stronger... it amps your durability... Even wonder why Thor can be two shotted and on his knees or is many of other LOW durability showings when compared to Thanos. Yet, in that arc... NOTHING was effecting him.. Hmmmmm. Yet Thanos was able to effect him MORE than anybody else, and in fact, get the better of the fight. An AMPED thor with the PG and mjolnir could do nothing but give thanos a trickle of blood and a smile on his face. Thanos proved stronger than an amped thor, yet you're comparing him to a weaker version of Thor LOL
Originally posted by gogogadgetgo
still just a bunch of yada yada with no on panel proof or evidence. OP didnt ask for a wall of text. he asked for proof and on panel evidence that shows Thanos' feats that put him above Thor in terms of strength and blasting power.i'm sure you can come up with some and post them...
I'll start, here's the age old yet still canon Godblast used on Galactus, which, according to Galactus himself, would have killed him
your turn
💃
This is the best you can do.... Thor shooting a god blast at a WEAK almost dying Galactus and it didn't even MOVE him. Thanos fires a blast at a WELL FED galactus and it throws him through his ship and miles away... HMMMMMMMMM. Thanks for proving my point.
I'm still waiting for the rebuttal to the Quasar construct feat gogo
I'm still waiting for a rebuttal on how you can compare bad guys to heroes... Name me the lifting feats DS, Despero, Kurse, Mangog and thanos have? come on name them... You can't and it's 100% fact that bad guys don't have lifting feats.. and yet when they don't you use this as proof of something LOL LOL. This is the weakest argument in years. Please please... name me the lifting feats those villians have or conceded they won't have some and thus that isn't proof of anything. We have to look at other places to find their strength.
Originally posted by r0nm0n88
dude thor already fought thanos. THor had the PG. Lets say the PG wasnt very great, its still fair to say it increases thor atleast 25%. So thor at least 125% fought thanos and lost. Now when it come to feats yes Thor has more. due to his appearances. But, thanos has been shown as thors superior in combat so ill stick to thanos beating him
Thor didn't lose to Thanos, he lost to Thanos gun.
Thor was beating Thanos and Thanos was getting tired so he cheated.
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Not really.
Questions ODG...
1. Do you think Thor is stronger than Thanos? DO you think because Thanos doesn't have lifting feats that means he's weaker?
2. Do you think Thor has stronger blast power than Thanos. I'm not just talking about the Godblast but in general as a whole?
3. Lastly if Thor has a strength level of 100... what is Thanos?
Originally posted by OneDumbG0
^ 1. No. No.2. Without Godblast or reamplifying power through Mjolnir, no.
3. 5,000,543,190,000,441,000,672.
come on man. I was asking seriously.
2. Include the Godblast is fine.. However, I'm not just talking about high end blast for each. I'm talking about them being compared overall and in general. Or you can can compare Thor's Godblast with thanos higher end blast and give me a number like Godblast is 100 and Thanos is.... Then just use there regular blasts with the same. either way.
3. come on man
Originally posted by KuRuPT Thanosi
I guess I will have to deal with this tool myself.Listen you twit... Bad Guys don't have LIFTING feats. Is this a tough concept for you to understand being as slow as you are or what is the issue? Name me all the lifting feats Darkseid, Despero or Thanos has? You won't find many if at all will you? Know why... cause they don't need to save earth or the universe and thus have to lift this or turn this wheel to do so. So now that we've established with 100% certainly that bad guys don't and cannot be compared to heroes who will have lifting feats.
However, what we can do is logical assumption based on narration and on panel evidence. We know Hulk is strong... we know very strong when angry. We know The Thing is strong and has impressive lifting feats... Yet the writer made things crystal clear for us... Thanos grabbed both of them and as they were resisting being smashed together says "you call yourselves strong.. I am strength personified" What is the writer making clear... Thanos is in another league than these two strong guys combined. Is that a tough logical conclusion for you to make? It certainly isn't for intelligent people. When we see Thanos backhand people with ease and slap them away like ants... What does that tell us... He treats them like children and he's the parent. He does this all the time and laughs at the heroes for even trying to attempt to step to him. Pak... a avid hulk lover and writer.. said in an interview when asked who is stronger Hulk or Thanos... Thanos is in another league. Hmmmmm this is a hulk wankfest writer telling us how Thanos is viewed at Marvel.
MORE proof... we have NEVER seen Thanos overpowered via strength and treated like a child by ANY herald INCLUDING Thor. NOT ONCE. He treats them like children then NEVER treat him like one. Hmmmmmmm why is that... Um because it is clear to marvel or anybody with half a brain that THanos is just plain stronger than any herald. Period. An amped Thor was dealt with by Thanos who was getting the better of the fight. The PG mad Thor even stronger and yet he couldn't do a damn thing to Thanos. He didn't overpower him in any way shape or form. Yet you think regular thor can... You are borderline retarded for that line of thinking.
Now onto blast power... First the debate has already been won becaues you're using isolated select rarely used blasts from Thor... and compare them to average blasts by Thanos. That is a horrible way to debate. Not only does Thor have to chant to do said Godblast which means Thanos fighting to the best of his ability won't even be there to take it.. Thus how does it even matter. You dont' just take high end feats for one and average for another. That has already lost you the debate. Lets look at average showings...
The one clear cut example that shows beyond a shadow of a doubt who has stronger blast is when Quasar had THOR, hulk, drax, Thanos and other heroes trapped in his shield construct. Thor and all the people except Thanos was trying to break it. Thor threw his hammer they were punching it etc etc.... Thanos in ONE shot destroyed the construct. Game over right there.
Lets go further.... Thanos matched an abstract blast power to free him from captivity. The abstract I'm referring to is the In-betweener. This wasn't claimed to be a crazy all powerful blast from Thanos... this was just described as a normal blast. Thanos matching the output of an abstract WTF PWNS Thor using his Godblast on anybody. The only one that kinda compares is the exitar showing.. however that doesn't compare because of what it took Thor to accomplish it which was the belt fo strength reinforcement. Not applicable here.
Lets take a look at more... Galactus when thor blasted him was WEAK and wasn't portrayed as strong as he would later be viewed. This is agreed upon with even Rage. So you have Thor blasting a WEAK Galacus and just having him turn and run. You have Thanos blasting a WELL FED Galactus... and Galactus goes flying through his ship and for miles bouncing off the moon. Hmmmm seems very clear which blast was more powerful to me.
I could go on and on but that is enough toolage for now.
Why so slow? Lifting feat? Lifting feats arent the only feats Thanos can use to prove his superior strength. We can use hitting feats, grappling feats, throwing feats, etc. Yet you keep bringing up this stupid "Bad guys don't have lifting feats."
Stop it! It makes you look slow and not able to learn.
PG Thor was winning against Thanos. Thanos had a bloody nose and everything. Thanos grew tired of the fight and cheated.
Second, comics are canon not interviews (unless they are explaining something that happen in the comic story). Not all of Marvel share the same opinion. In one comic Thanos admits to Hulk's superiority when he fights champion. Third, Hulk can BECOME STRONGER than any metahuman in the universe. So it is dumb to speak of being stronger than him period. You saying that its impossible for Hulk to be stronger than Thanos?
You exagerated to the point of lying as well. You use lowballing to try to prove Thanos superiority. How can Thor not break free of Quasar's construct without it being a low showing and thus u lowballing? Thor has greater feats that prove it was a low showing.
The inbetweener is not an abstract. That's why he's called the Inbetweener. Get your facts straight. Also matching blasts doesn't prove which blast is stronger. Energy doesn't work the way matter does.
Most energy travel at the speed of light and have mostly burning properties to them. Thus it's impossible to know who's blast is stronger just by them cancelling each other out. Superman has cancelled the OE out with his HV. Is his HV of equal power? Hell no! Bad logic on your part.
Lastly, Galactus don't even weigh that much. So Thanos blasting him by suprise before he can brace doesn't prove anything for Thanos.
