Gladiator & WWH vs THANOS

Started by h1a87 pages
Originally posted by iceman24567
Joke right? He's tanked far worse with no real damage. Gladz striking power is to low to affect Thanos

Prove that he tanked far worst in physical blunt force attacks.
Glads at confidence through the roof can 1-2 shot Thanos.

in a fist fight team wins 7/10

in a normal fight thanos wins 8/10 being that sometimes he tries to go h2h before he starts using his powers

Originally posted by h1a8
Prove that he tanked far worst in physical blunt force attacks.
Glads at confidence through the roof can 1-2 shot Thanos.
He's tanked far worse in blunt force and energy attacks. His durability is his bread and butter everybody here knows this but you choose to ignore it. I rather be arrested for being black than try to prove something to a troll like you 😬. Gladz could hit Thanos all he wants while Thanos smiles

Originally posted by carver9
Going by this Gladiator is one of the most powerful beings in Marvel U and DC right under Galactus since no one has a a Bio like him but even though I love Gladiator I know the truth.

http://www.imagebam.com/image/b81fb785101320


I don't see anything in his bio that even suggests he's one of the most powerful beings in a Universe where busting a Galaxy is child's play to the members of the higher tiers.

Originally posted by iceman24567
He's tanked far worse in blunt force and energy attacks. His durability is his bread and butter everybody here knows this but you choose to ignore it. I rather be arrested for being black than try to prove something to a troll like you 😬. Gladz could hit Thanos all he wants while Thanos smiles

That means you can't prove it. Concession accepted. Thanos blunt force durability isn't all that great. His energy projection durability is though.

Originally posted by h1a8
That means you can't prove it. Concession accepted. Thanos blunt force durability isn't all that great. His energy projection durability is though.
It means proof isn't needed because Thanos' durability is common knowledge. Just because you say random shit doesn't make it true. Yes i concede to the fact that you are trolling again 👆

ive heard gladiator can survive a supernova at point blank range

Originally posted by iceman24567
It means proof isn't needed because Thanos' durability is common knowledge. Just because you say random shit doesn't make it true. Yes i concede to the fact that you are trolling again 👆

It's common knowledge that Thanos has super human durability (beyond human) but it isn't common knowledge that he has the durability to withstand the fierce punches of a Gladiator WHOSE CONFIDENCE IS THROUGH THE ROOF. Its actually a lie.

I troll not here. You are trolling since you are making a claim without backing it up.

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
ive heard gladiator can survive a supernova at point blank range

So can my titanium balls Thanos would still 1 shot him if he feels like it

Originally posted by h1a8
It's common knowledge that Thanos has super human durability (beyond human) but it isn't common knowledge that he has the durability to withstand the fierce punches of a Gladiator WHOSE CONFIDENCE IS THROUGH THE ROOF. Its actually a lie.

I troll not here. You are trolling since you are making a claim without backing it up.

Didn't i already concede? Why are you still trolling? What feats does this version of Gladz that nobody has ever seen have? Just curious

Originally posted by Colossus-Big C
ive heard gladiator can survive a supernova at point blank range

Supernovas are among the list of phenomena that comic book writers should stay away from. Along with blackholes and stellar cores they're notorious jobber zones.

Originally posted by iceman24567
Didn't i already concede? Why are you still trolling? What feats does this version of Gladz that nobody has ever seen have? Just curious

A lesser version has destroyed a REAL planet (one with an atmosphere) with a few punches. It is stated that he can collaspe stars with his bare hand.

Originally posted by h1a8
A lesser version has destroyed a REAL planet (one with an atmosphere) with a few punches. It is stated that he can collaspe stars with his bare hand.

So a ambiguous feat and hyperbole your argument is sound 😆 . Ignoring you seems to be the right course of action i have learned alot from our "debate" 👆

Originally posted by h1a8
A lesser version has destroyed a REAL planet (one with an atmosphere) with a few punches. It is stated that he can collaspe stars with his bare hand.

Feat projection ftw. 🙄

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Feat projection ftw. 🙄
I feel h1 is really trying though it kinda makes me sad 🙁

Originally posted by iceman24567
So a ambiguous feat and hyperbole your argument is sound 😆 . Ignoring you seems to be the right course of action i have learned alot from our "debate" 👆
I disagree that it is hyperbole. But I do agree that we have not yet seen a Glads that can collaspe a star with his bare hands. I find that unbelievable. How is the planet destroying feat ambiguous?

Have you not looked at the scan? Nevermind i don't care 😬

^Of course I have. Why you think I said REAL PLANET?

Don't know don't care anyways Thanos wins

Trolling again I see. Trolls don't support their claim.