Originally posted by h1a8Spiderman vs firelord is the definition of pis.
Spidey has lifted(or braced) multistory buildings more than once. He has flattened cosmic powered beings (Firelord). He has threw around tanks like they were balded up pieces of paper.. He has smashed to pieces tanks like they were made of plastic toys. Has lifted the same boulder that was so big that he had to help She-Hulk lift. He has caught a huge helicopter in his hands falling from several stories, He has finger flicked trains cars over like they were nothing, etc. Many of these are class 100 feats or close. He has many many others that are beyond 15tons though.
Issue numbers, scans? anything?
Originally posted by h1a8Feats don't prove who is stronger actual comparisons do. You are wrong like always. Speculating about the weight of some object is hilarious and we argue based on the total sum history of their showings and how these characters are portrayed.
If we don't assign numbers to feats then we have to go by the handbooks. If we don't go by handbooks then we have to assign numbers to feats.We do this so that we know what type of strength a character is dealing with (just in case they become real LOL). So that we have a good estimate to compare the strengths of two or more characters. Its been a rule or a long time now (and common sense) that FEATS prove who is stronger.
If we ONLY go off of which feat LOOKS better then that is not proof but opinion. With opinion there is nothing to debate about.
Originally posted by h1a8Proof?
I doubt if Thanos can do anything to a Gladiator whose confidence is through the roof. That Gladiator can possibly 1 or 2 shot Thanos.
Originally posted by h1a8You made the claim so therefore the burden of proof is on you. You are the worst.
Prove that Thanos can tank the punches of a confidence through the roof Gladiator.
Originally posted by quanchi112Of course they do. It is illogical to go by Quanchi rules. Is Captain America stronger than a being who can lift tanks? If not, then by comparisons why does he win? Oh because of skill? Well then we can't say that since a character beat so and so then that character is stronger can we?Feats don't prove who is stronger actual comparisons do. You are wrong like always. Speculating about the weight of some object is hilarious and we argue based on the total sum history of their showings and how these characters are portrayed.
"Possibly" and "doubt" implies opinion, proof is not needed.
Proof?
Iceman here first claimed that Thanos won't feel Gladiator's punches, so the burden is on him. I already shown the logic that a lesser Gladiator can smash REAL planets (ones with atmospheres) with a few punches. This proves that the Gladiator in this thread would 1-2 shot Thanos.
You made the claim so therefore the burden of proof is on you. You are the worst.
Originally posted by h1a8People are not reading the entire thread. They see the names and that's it they state there opinions for the favorite.
Not if he flies into Thanos before Thanos can raise his hand 2inches.
Even so what evidence supports that Thanos can even harm a confidence through the roof Gladiator?
Originally posted by BattleMage
People are not reading the entire thread. They see the names and that's it they state there opinions for the favorite.
I believe the Glads in this thread solos but that's just me.
Hulk is a non factor here unless CIS is affecting Thanos.
You say that Hulk is getting madder (thus stronger) by the second. What is the rate? 1000tons per second?
Originally posted by h1a8When i said he starts at 500 i mean 500,000. Because normal Hulk starts out at around 85-95.
I believe the Glads in this thread solos but that's just me.Hulk is a non factor here unless CIS is affecting Thanos.
You say that Hulk is getting madder (thus stronger) by the second. What is the rate? 1000tons per second?