Originally posted by Starscream M
actually there is a differencea taekwondo black belt may be a good MA, but would get ****ed up by Tyson in his prime who is not a good MA
TAekwondo is a type of MA
this is what I mean, you dont have any idea what your talking about. There both MA. Tyson the better MA fighter or overall fighter. Taekwondo better for sports anyways.
Originally posted by Starscream M
yeah you;ve really proven it over the years with your stellar debating 🙄
Originally posted by iceman24567
I actually know a fairly high ranked Tae guy he has dozens of trophies i doubt he would last 5 seconds against Mike in his prime 😆
Everyone one in the crowd covers their face and winces as the Tae gets punched. Theres a crie of "OOOOOOOO!!!!"
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
boxing is a type of MA you do realises.....TAekwondo is a type of MA
this is what I mean, you dont have any idea what your talking about. There both MA. Tyson the better MA fighter or overall fighter. Taekwondo better for sports anyways.
I see what you mean BH but Tyson wasn't just good at boxing because of his training.
Originally posted by Starscream M
boxing is not MA
I think it is.
Originally posted by DeadlineI see what you mean BH but Tyson wasn't just good at boxing because of his training.
though should be mention that tyson is not even a top 15 boxer. and there were numerous heavy weights would would beat him.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
a lot of it was due to training and his physical knock out prowesses.
I think alot of it had to do with the fact he was a nutter as well.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
though should be mention that tyson is not even a top 15 boxer. and there were numerous heavy weights would would beat him.
Well he ain't now thats for sure.
Originally posted by Starscream M
AHahahahahahah I think you should get a temp ban for such ignorance.
then look at people like george forman who face several top ten boxer and simple has more impressive record then tyson.