Mr. X vs Captain America(sword fight)

Started by Deadline7 pages

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
No no he would not.

You should go take a look at there records. Foreman is better clearly and he fought much better guys. Hell in his forties he did better against holyfield then tyson did who got two shots at him.

Yeah of course George Foreman is better but I don't think it would be a total stomp. Yeah you might be right actually.

Originally posted by Deadline
Yeah of course George Foreman is better but I don't think it would be a total stomp. Yeah you might be right actually.

I think tyson would last a bit but would be clearly losing every round untill he was stop in 3rd or fourth though maybe sooner, tyson had some what suspect chin.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
I think tyson would last a bit but would be clearly losing every round untill he was stop in 3rd or fourth though maybe sooner, tyson had some what suspect chin.

I think thats what I said BH. 😬

Originally posted by Deadline
Well within 3 rounds I guess or possibly 4.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
IF thing was PIS plain and simple I cant even believe your trying to uses it as evidences. The entire thing was IF, Luke wank fest in which thunderbolts were written out of character and powers were ignored.

Some of his opponents had files on him thats why.

Haha, okay fine. I'll stop. Damn, I didn't know you felt so strongly about it.

I think Cho had files on him. Besides, Captain America is the head of S.H.I.E.L.D. so I think they're is a good possibility he'd know of Mr. X's abilities. Not sure if they fall into the general knowledge category.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
except thats not how it works. Drunken fist goes on pure instincts which is something x trained against making such a move impossible, but remeber being a hack just did zero backround info on the thunderbolts.

Remeber?

I'm assuming this was used to counter Wolverine's rage? I didn't bother to reading their most recent fight. I started too, but it got boring so I stopped.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
and taskmaster who mind is also enhanced.

mhmm

I'm not too sure I'd but Taskmaster in the same boat as Rogers. His powers were explained as photographic memory tying directly into muscle memory as I recall. That's a bit different from Rogers who had his brain speed up, evolved in regards to combat specifically. Of course I might be forgetting a description of Taskmaster's powers that compare them to Rogers.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
lol I wonder how that would work, it be a funny read. Though X is fluent in many language I believe, not sure about french.

He'd probably get his shit pushed in once his telepathy is overcome. He seems to fold when it's been countered.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
writer of thunderbolts seemed to like him.

I liked him, he had possibilities but they just sent him right back to the celler after thunderbolts ended

Quote or concede to be a liar. But yea, I could see the writer having a thing for the character. He played him up as pretty uber until his telepathy was countered.

Originally posted by Deadline
I think thats what I said BH. 😬

I was agreeing with you I should have made it clearer.

Originally posted by Deadline
Tyson would mangle George Foreman wtf are you talking about srank? Said I was gonna stay OT oh well.

Nah, at his peak Tyson was destroy him. Mike was too fast, too powerful and just as good with his left and his right hand. The only thing Foreman had over Tyson was heart, but that isn't enough for a win.

Before his trainer / father figure died, Tyson was one of the greats... I know that is easy to forget. Try to disregard the "fighter" Tyson devolved into and remember him at his best.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Nah, at his peak Tyson was destroy him. Mike was too fast, too powerful and just as good with his left and his right hand. The only thing Foreman had over Tyson was heart, but that isn't enough for a win.

Before his trainer / father figure died, Tyson was one of the greats... I know that is easy to forget. Try to disregard the "fighter" Tyson devolved into and remember him at his best.

Yea this is one of the time were you're talking out of your arse but I won't derail the thread anymore. Just watch his fights.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Haha, okay fine. I'll stop. Damn, I didn't know you felt so strongly about it.

I think Cho had files on him. Besides, Captain America is the head of S.H.I.E.L.D. so I think they're is a good possibility he'd know of Mr. X's abilities. Not sure if they fall into the general knowledge category.


lol thanks

I bet capt would know.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Lol. Remeber?

I'm assuming this was used to counter Wolverine's rage? I didn't bother to reading their most recent fight. I started too, but it got boring so I stopped.


reember or however it spelled.

yes it was used to combat berserker rage.

mhmm

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
I'm not too sure I'd but Taskmaster in the same boat as Rogers. His powers were explained as photographic memory tying directly into muscle memory. That's a bit different from Roger's who literally had his brain processing speed up, evolved in regards to combat specifically. Of course I might be forgetting a description of Taskmaster's powers that compare them to Rogers.

Taskmaster mind would need to be enhanced to accomnplish such feats. espcially ones like increasing his speed to level capable of catching bullets which his mind would need to beable to percieve. Though it may not be on capts level it most certain enhanced I believe.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
He'd probably get his shit pushed in once his telepathy is overcome. He seems to fold when it's been countered.

it hard to say both times it shocked him, he dident expect it. However he showed the he evolves such as when ghost tried to sneak up on him again x was able to senses it. He was also able to combat when Nuke was able to by pass his abilities. also how would capt bypass them?

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Quote or concede to be a liar. But yea, I could see the writer having a thing for the character. He played him up as pretty uber until his telepathy was countered.
[/B][/QUOTE]
lol what?

why does he always were sun glasses even inside I can't believe he one of thoses guys

Originally posted by Deadline
Yea this is one of the time were you're talking out of your arse but I won't derail the thread anymore. Just watch his fights.

I have and I think that you, like Battlehammer bringing Tyson v Holyfield up, can't separate the fighter Tyson was from the fighter he became. As soon as the work "peak" comes into the equation all that BS that Tyson's career became is irrelevant. Starscream said Tyson in his prime and he was right.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I have and I think that you, like Battlehammer bringing Tyson v Holyfield up, can't separate the fighter Tyson was from the fighter he became. As soon as the work "peak" comes into the equation all that BS that Tyson's career became is irrelevant. Starscream said Tyson in his prime and he was right.

Talk to the hand. *snaps fingers*

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Nah, at his peak Tyson was destroy him. Mike was too fast, too powerful and just as good with his left and his right hand. The only thing Foreman had over Tyson was heart, but that isn't enough for a win.

Before his trainer / father figure died, Tyson was one of the greats... I know that is easy to forget. Try to disregard the "fighter" Tyson devolved into and remember him at his best.


no no he would not. except tyson wasent faster then foreman at all. Foreman was pretty much as powerful as tyson and has vastly better chin and was more skilled. Put foreman and tyson record side by side. foreman in his prime was better had more wins by TKO and KO and fought vastly superior people. Tyson fought mostly chumps.

yea and foreman came back in his friggin forties overweight, that tyson excuses is lame, evenb looking purely at there primes Foreman record is simply better it not even debatable. Hell even ring magazine rates Foreman at number 7 while Tyson does not even make top 15.

^ Can't be arsed to argue but I think this one time BH really knows what hes talking about.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I have and I think that you, like Battlehammer bringing Tyson v Holyfield up, can't separate the fighter Tyson was from the fighter he became. As soon as the work "peak" comes into the equation all that BS that Tyson's career became is irrelevant. Starscream said Tyson in his prime and he was right.

I not even talking about that. Tyson in his prime lost to James Douglas by KO who was a no body, this is the crap im talking about Tyson was fed and he stuill got his shit kicked in. Tyson won 37 fights in a row and lost to a chump.

Foreman won 40 fights ibn a row and lost to the best heavy weight to ever live (who cheat by today standards to win if not mistaken)

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
I not even talking about that. Tyson in his prime lost to James Douglas by KO who was a no body,

He wasn't in his prime then though.

Originally posted by Deadline
He wasn't in his prime then though.

that was his prime, he was only five years in at the time. He left his prime several years later.

he was 42 to 1 favorite that is absurd odds.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
that was his prime, he was only five years in at the time. He left his prime several years later.

he was 42 to 1 favorite that is absurd odds.

he prob didnt take the fight seriously

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
that was his prime, he was only five years in at the time. He left his prime several years later.

he was 42 to 1 favorite that is absurd odds.

No mate he really wasn't. He probably wasn't into as much or trying his best.

Originally posted by Starscream M
he prob didnt take the fight seriously

thats a lame excuses, just like saying his trainer death is the reason he went down hill which is utter BS seeing as his trainer died the same year he turned pro.

Originally posted by Deadline
No mate he really wasn't. He probably wasn't into as much or trying his best.

or he simply got caught and was never that good. He fought chumps it a fact.

He also spent his entire carreer as a pro pritty much with out his original trainer who died the same year he turned pro.

That was most certainly his prime, he was only 24 for christ sakes.

Originally posted by Deadline
^ Can't be arsed to argue but I think this one time BH really knows what hes talking about.

also I not sure how to take this, it was like a compliment inside an insult.

Originally posted by Dum Dum Dugan
or he simply got caught and was never that good. He fought chumps it a fact.

He also spent his entire carreer as a pro pritty much with out his original trainer who died the same year he turned pro.

That was most certainly his prime, he was only 24 for christ sakes.

Its not just about age though.