Sersi Vs Dr Manhatten Vs Silver Surfer

Started by Black bolt z26 pages

Originally posted by Mindset
so you can't make the positive claim that they did in an argument
And you can't make a positive claim that they didn't.

I dont need to, burden of proof is on you.

Originally posted by Mindset
I dont need to, burden of proof is on you.
Or its on you.I never said that they did.But you don't have proof that they didn't.And theres no way to prove either way.

... Until proven otherwise, they aren't

Originally posted by Uriel005
kk I give up someone give me definitive proof of anything physically or psychicly hurting Manhattan and I'll concede. Prove that anything can block his teleportation. Prove the past reading of Silk Spectre wasn't TP. Give me some proof that anything can be done to stop Manhattan. On panel feats only.

Oh wait I just remembered nobody can give me an on panel weakness for Manhattan beyond tachyon disruption. Arguement is moot remove Dr. Manhattan from threads. Anyone meta and below is instantly one shotted and anyone higher there isn't enough info to say what would effect anyone.


Pretty much everything you just did was either asking us to prove a negative, or a no limit fallacy. In fact, every argument you've given in the entire thread has been wrong for those reasons.

Originally posted by Mindset
... Until proven otherwise, they aren't
Or until proven otherwise they are.I can't prove they are and you can't prove they aren't. You can't just say they aren't when theres absolutely no evidence to suggest they aren't.But the same can be said for they are. So just drop the subject.

I don't need to prove a negative.

Originally posted by Mindset
I don't need to prove a negative.
Well whats your evidence to suggest they aren't as powerful? Jack. Same for me. It can't be argued one way or another.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Well whats your evidence to suggest they aren't as powerful? Jack. Same for me. It can't be argued one way or another.
I dont need any, someone needs evidence to prove that they are.

Originally posted by Uriel005
kk I give up someone give me definitive proof of anything physically or psychicly hurting Manhattan and I'll concede. Prove that anything can block his teleportation. Prove the past reading of Silk Spectre wasn't TP. Give me some proof that anything can be done to stop Manhattan. On panel feats only.

Oh wait I just remembered nobody can give me an on panel weakness for Manhattan beyond tachyon disruption. Arguement is moot remove Dr. Manhattan from threads. Anyone meta and below is instantly one shotted and anyone higher there isn't enough info to say what would effect anyone.

Originally posted by King Kandy
Pretty much everything you just did was either asking us to prove a negative, or a no limit fallacy. In fact, every argument you've given in the entire thread has been wrong for those reasons.

Same statement applies for Black Bolt, and h1 is just hopeless.

Can't believe ppl can't seem to grasp that idea.

Originally posted by Mindset
I dont need any, someone needs evidence to prove that they are.
OK so what proof do you have that they do decrease in power?
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Same statement applies for Black Bolt, and h1 is just hopeless.

Can't believe ppl can't seem to grasp that idea.

How? I've said that I think surfer would beat manhattan in a fight.But I also think people are underestimating manhattan.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
OK so what proof do you have that they do decrease in power?
Originally posted by Mindset
I dont need any, someone needs evidence to prove that they [don't]
Originally posted by Black bolt z
OK so what proof do you have that they do decrease in power?

He doesn't need to. You need to prove via feats what DM's clones are capable of. Lacking this, then the clones basically can just do what they've done on panel (Essentially, very little).

Originally posted by Black bolt z
How? I've said that I think surfer would beat manhattan in a fight.But I also think people are underestimating manhattan.

Ok, throw in a strawman fallacy right in there, too. :-/

Originally posted by Mindset
And I don't need to prove that they do.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
He doesn't need to. You need to prove via feats what DM's clones are capable of. Lacking this, then the clones basically can just do what they've done on panel (Essentially, very little).

Ok, throw in a strawman fallacy right in there, too. :-/

Exactly.They'd probably be able to do what manhattan has done which is little.

What stawman fallacy?I said I think surfer would win.But I also think people aren't giving manhattan the credit he deserves.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
And I don't need to prove that they do. Exactly.They'd probably be able to do what manhattan has done which is little.

What stawman fallacy?I said I think surfer would win.But I also think people aren't giving manhattan the credit he deserves.

You do if you want to claim that they do, if you're not, then I don't know why you're even replying to my posts...

Originally posted by Mindset
You do if you want to claim that they do, if you're not, then I don't know why you're even replying to my posts...
How is what we are saying any different?You have no proof that they don't and I don't have any proof that they do.So just leave it.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
How is what we are saying any different?You have no proof that they don't and I don't have any proof that they do.So just leave it.
Do you know how to debate?

Black Bolt stop demanding negative proof.

Originally posted by Omega Vision
Black Bolt stop demanding negative proof.
What negative proof?And actually there is some(even if minimal)proof that they can do the same.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
What negative proof?And actually there is some(even if minimal)proof that they can do the same.

You're demanding that Mindset provide evidence that they aren't as powerful as the original when you can't provide evidence that they are.