Batman (Bruce) vs Steve Rogers (No SSS)
Recently Steve Rogers (formerly known as Captain America) beat several guys that had the Super Soldier Serum in their blood streams. How well would Steve do against Bruce without the serum, now that we know that he didn't need it, to take out guys superior to him in all ways except combat ability.
No gadgets, or shield.
Who would win?
Originally posted by CosmicCometno bias? Going by you statement that Steve would beat Bruce 4 times out of 10 without SSS... you either have a bias or you're ignorant. bruce and Cap are damn near physical equals when Steve has the SSS, without it, Steve would be at a serious strength/speed/stamina disadvantage. Also, Bruce is the better MA.
With the Serum, Cap should get it 7/10.Without it, Bruce 6/10.
No bias, I like them equally.
Bruce > Steve (no SSS) 10/10.
Originally posted by marwash22
no bias? Going by you statement that Steve would beat Bruce 4 times out of 10 without SSS... you either have a bias or you're ignorant. bruce and Cap are damn near physical equals when Steve has the SSS, without it, Steve would be at a serious strength/speed/stamina disadvantage. Also, Bruce is the better MA.Bruce > Steve (no SSS) 10/10.
Nah. Bruce is not on par with Rogers with the Serum. The dude is strong enough to throw the shield fast enough to catch up to a missile.
And I suppose without it, I don't think Batman is better than Rogers at MA, but is stronger and faster by more than enough to make up for it.
Originally posted by CosmicCometthey're both peak-human. I'd give Steve only a slight physical advantage w/ the SSS.
Nah. Bruce is not on par with Rogers with the Serum. The dude is strong enough to throw the shield fast enough to catch up to a missile.
Originally posted by CosmicCometIt's not really a matter of opinion, it's a fact that Bruce is a better fighter than Cap.
And I suppose without it, I don't think Batman is better than Rogers at MA, but is stronger and faster by more than enough to make up for it.