Originally posted by Parmaniacother than easily trouncing spiderman in his first appearance, Blade tells us he's beaten spiderman
Does Negus has other feats that would put him > Spider-man? Outside of this comic I mean. I don't really read Blade.
my point on Negus vamping out still stands, he was just as vamped out before his fight with Blade as he was for spiderman
Originally posted by snoopdogg
Srank are you actually arguing that Negus has to "vamp-out" to finish Spidey? If not then shut the **** up because you have no point, for all we know Spidey was kayoed from the first hit especially since we see later that a weakend Negus still can swat Spidey aside like a fly.
I don't know if he had too, I know that he did. He vamped out against Spider-man to finish him off, he didn't against Blade.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I don't know if he had too, I know that he did. He vamped out against Spider-man to finish him off, he didn't against Blade.
The reason why you always have an answer that involves Blade always looking bad isn't because you're intelligent and its not a coincedence. It's because before the debate has already started you have the intention of downplaying feats, therefore you only see what you want.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I don't know if he had too, I know that he did. He vamped out against Spider-man to finish him off, he didn't against Blade.
Originally posted by Trackz
there's absolutely no difference between the two vamp outs, not only that it makes no logical sense that he would hold back when he was afraid of having his whole empire fall and was going against spiderman and blade but would go all out when he was just fighting spiderman after having laughed off his punches in normal mode.
Originally posted by Deadline
The reason why you always have an answer that involves Blade always looking bad isn't because you're intelligent and its not a coincedence. It's because before the debate has already started you have the intention of downplaying feats, therefore you only see what you want.
It's actually the polar opposite. You guys love Blade so damn much that every time he appears you throw on your rose tinted glasses and proceed to exaggerate and some in many cases fabricate details to feed your delusions.. Then I have to come in and tell you what really happened, and like any person clinging to a delusion you refuse to see the truth. You just can't see it because you four are like the crazy people on hoarders that don't think having a house full of garbage is a problem. Now I will say for the sake of clarification that most of the above pertains to largely trackz and snoop far more than it does you.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
It's actually the polar opposite. You guys love Blade so damn much that every time he appears you throw on your rose tinted glasses and proceed to exaggerate and some in many cases fabricate details to feed your delusions.. Then I have to come in and tell you what really happened, and like any person clinging to a delusion you refuse to see the truth. You just can't see it because you four are like the crazy people on hoarders that don't think having a house full of garbage is a problem. Now I will say for the sake of clarification that most of the above pertains to largely trackz and snoop far more than it does you.
Im not a Blade fan though. I only own two blade comics I've got more Wolverine issues than Blade. Now what?
Originally posted by Deadline
Im not a Blade fan though. I only own two blade comics I've got more Wolverine issues than Blade. Now what?
If you hadn't aquired those Wolverine issues for the sole purpose of doing what you're accusing Srank of.... to downplay Wolverine or lie about the context of events within them... then this would have more merit..
But it's coming from you... so....
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
It's actually the polar opposite. You guys love Blade so damn much that every time he appears you throw on your rose tinted glasses and proceed to exaggerate and some in many cases fabricate details to feed your delusions.. Then I have to come in and tell you what really happened, and like any person clinging to a delusion you refuse to see the truth. You just can't see it because you four are like the crazy people on hoarders that don't think having a house full of garbage is a problem. Now I will say for the sake of clarification that most of the above pertains to largely trackz and snoop far more than it does you.
now we have the fact that you're clearly ignoring the fact Negus was vamped out before he fought Blade while he only vamped out to finish spiderman off which adds to the list of reasons why Blade performed better.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
There was a difference between the vamp outs, there is a pretty clear visual distinction between the two forms. Now I don't know what is rational was for not going all out against Blade, all I can say is that based on events he clearly didn't have too.
1. there is no visual distinction, his ears are just as big, his eyes are clearly red, there's absolutely no difference.
2. Again there's no rationale for Negus, who is clearly angrier and has more to lose to not vamp out to his maximum when going against Blade and Spiderman especially if you're under the notion that he vamped out to the max against spiderman who he was clearly laughing off.
Originally posted by Trackz
says the individual who tried to argue that Blade didn't have accelerated healing and disregarded the narrartors statements about the character.now we have the fact that you're clearly ignoring the fact Negus was vamped out before he fought Blade while he only vamped out to finish spiderman off which adds to the list of reasons why Blade performed better.
Didn't he even argue that Blade was wearing kevlar when he said he didn't?
Originally posted by Trackz
says the individual who tried to argue that Blade didn't have accelerated healing and disregarded the narrartors statements about the character.now we have the fact that you're clearly ignoring the fact Negus was vamped out before he fought Blade while he only vamped out to finish spiderman off which adds to the list of reasons why Blade performed better.
Srank claimed that Blade's never proven to have an accelerated healing factor on specific levels....
And he was right. The "healing factor" feats of Blade leave a lot to be desired.
Now I don't see how either performed better... they both look like mutton by the end of their respective encounters...
Originally posted by jinzin
Srank claimed that Blade's never proven to have an accelerated healing factor on specific levels....And he was right. The "healing factor" feats of Blade leave a lot to be desired.
Now I don't see how either performed better... they both look like mutton by the end of their respective encounters...
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
It's actually the polar opposite. You guys love Blade so damn much that every time he appears you throw on your rose tinted glasses and proceed to exaggerate and some in many cases fabricate details to feed your delusions.. Then I have to come in and tell you what really happened, and like any person clinging to a delusion you refuse to see the truth. You just can't see it because you four are like the crazy people on hoarders that don't think having a house full of garbage is a problem. Now I will say for the sake of clarification that most of the above pertains to largely trackz and snoop far more than it does you.
Originally posted by Trackz
says the individual who tried to argue that Blade didn't have accelerated healing and disregarded the narrartors statements about the character.now we have the fact that you're clearly ignoring the fact Negus was vamped out before he fought Blade while he only vamped out to finish spiderman off which adds to the list of reasons why Blade performed better.
I said Blade has never demonstrated a healing factor on panel (which he hasn't), and that a poem of narrative hyperbole can't be taken as a literal account of events (which it can't).
When they vamped out in that book the structure of the face changed dramatically. Not merely point by huge bat like ears, upturned stub nose and a pronounced brow. Having pointier teeth and point ears isn't the same thing, as much as you'd love to fool your self into believing it is.