Originally posted by srankmissingnin
That's my opinion as well. I didn't think I was bashing either, I was being sincere. I honestly believe that someone who thinks poetic verse can be taken as a literal account of events and doesn't know how to differentiate between metaphor and hyperbole, should take some steps to educate himself on the matter.... particularly if that person feels the need to comment on it incisively..... but I'm not going to argue with a mod about what constitutes bashing.
The problem is you think you're right about everything. It doesn't just apply to Wolverine debates. Even your boy in the martial arts thread stated that you have a tendency to make sweeping generlisations and act like its fact.
Your opinion can't be swayed because you can't comprehend that your ever wrong about anything. All you ever do is bend over backwards to disprove any opinion thats different from your own.
Stating that Negus didn't get hit because the impact marker was grey is one of the most absurd things I have ever heard. Then on top of that you started arguing that Negus was more vamped out against Spiderman than he was against Blade. Thats not true theres no reason to think its true, you simply fabricate these excuses because you intended to do it before the debate started.
Originally posted by srankmissingnindeadpool has been hospitalized a couple of times, stop using low-showing to back your case, you're ignoring every other instance of Blade being shot/stabbed and being perfectly fine.
Blade was stated to have mild regenerative abilities in Marvel Max, which might not be cannon, and in which he had to get stitch to close a shallow cut on his shoulder. He has never been shown or has stated to have healead on panel.Again that's not a comparison, it's a statement. A comparison - you know - actually compares two things. This is a statement... and you've made up (well not really... but you think you have) a comparison out of it your mind. Saying time slows for Blade is not a comparison to anything, it is a blunt statement. It is narative hyperbole.
it's a metaphor for how blade views time when he moves fast. which is why it says the world slows for Blade, meaning through Blades eyes the world is moving slow, which means when Blade moves fast th world seems slow, it cannot be seen to mean that Blade is moving so fast that time is slowing down, the notion that it is referring to his perception rather than speed is more logical, and hence it's not a hyperbole.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Duganher origin was the same, being a clone of Wolverine. But even that isn't the same scenario, the next avengers are taken from a possible future, when the writer chose to use that alternate future he made the next avengers timeline canon to the marvels. Hell it's even confirmed that they're the same next avengers by Kang, the red hair and last name rogers are a give away that he's the son of Steve and Natasha, again being knocked out by james rogers is a low showing but I wouldn't try to use it in a debate like you are trying to use Blade's low-showings.
Movie are not cannon to comics. For starters X-23 was originally a carton character, here personality, history and even level of her powers are extremely different from her comic self. They do not translate over the way your trying to pretend they do. Movies/TV shows are not comic evidence.
Originally posted by Trackz
it's a metaphor for how blade views time when he moves fast. which is why it says the world slows for Blade, meaning through Blades eyes the world is moving slow, which means when Blade moves fast th world seems slow, it cannot be seen to mean that Blade is moving so fast that time is slowing down, the notion that it is referring to his perception rather than speed is more logical, and hence it's not a hyperbole.
Theres also the fact that Blade actually has superhuman speed and reflexes so you can pretty much assume that the statement is true. This is of course obvious to normal people not to people who constantly try to nitpick.
Originally posted by Dum Dum Duganevidence is in the respect thread, and being able to take bullets, stab wounds, and slash wounds and being 100 % in the next panel are clear indications that your healing factor matters.
lets see evidence then.Capt has Tanked bullets before does not mean his healing factor gunan mean shit in a fight.
Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Are you talking about the Punisher thing again, because those bullet wounds on his legs were shown several times through out the issue?
what Punisher thing, punisher never shot him in the legs
but in the first issue of his second series the bullet wounds were most certainly not around for the entire issue and were in fact gone by the time Blade jumps into the fight.
even cornell has annotated an issue to make sure it was shown that Blade had healed his wounds from a previous fight. (minutes after)
Originally posted by Deadline
The problem is you think you're right about everything. It doesn't just apply to Wolverine debates. Even your boy in the martial arts thread stated that you have a tendency to make sweeping generlisations and act like its fact.Your opinion can't be swayed because you can't comprehend that your ever wrong about anything. All you ever do is bend over backwards to disprove any opinion thats different from your own.
The assurance that he's right stems from the point that he uses FACTS to build up his arguments... as he already stated, he bases things off of what he sees more often than what he thinks.
That's a MAJOR difference between who Srank is and who you're painting him to be.
Now I know this is probably a very foreign idea for you, but it IS hard to comprehend being wrong about something when you're taking a position in a debate that's most likely right. When you build your arguments off of consistent facts, probability based outcomes, and common logic... it's hard to find yourself on the wrong side of a debate....
Again I know that's really foreign for a guy who thinks there's nothing wrong with Punisher overpowering Tigershark in water... but whatever.
What I'd like to know is what makes you think you're ANY different than what you're accusing Srank of? How often do you barrage into threads and take an opposing stance to me, DDD, or Srank out of sheer spite alone, or with complete supposition or circumstantial evidence to support you.... or worse when you ignore all matters of context to try and prove something? What makes you better?
Originally posted by Deadline
Stating that Negus didn't get hit because the impact marker was grey is one of the most absurd things I have ever heard. Then on top of that you started arguing that Negus was more vamped out against Spiderman than he was against Blade. Thats not true theres no reason to think its true, you simply fabricate these excuses because you intended to do it before the debate started.
It's DEFINITELY not more absurd than stating that a writers intention about Blade being equals with Logan was more important than what took place on panel..... Something you've argued I believe...
And Srank interpreting artistic representation as a source of evidence at least makes MORE SENSE than you ignoring artistic interpretations, storyline, and substituting them both for your own theories and agendas that were NEVER mentioned, presented or suggested on panel..... something else you've done (*coughorigingsandendingscough*).
What I find amusing most is this demonizing of Srank's debating style, jumping down my throat whenever I have ANY opinion, or your hypocritical attacks on DDD supporting a side has us all look like a group of villains hell bent on ruining your stay at KMC.... of course ignoring the fact that you're the one flinging yourself at us in debates heated by your own petty emotions lond before we ever had a thought to even address you...
What is this? 5-6 years on KMC and you're not done crying? Man, get some Prosac..... or a woman... probably both.
Originally posted by jinzin
Uhhh... that's what an argument is... 😕 Honestly, what's the point of arguing if you're not trying to disprove someone elses opposing opinion.The assurance that he's right stems from the point that he uses FACTS to build up his arguments... as he already stated, he bases things off of what he sees more often than what he thinks.
That's a MAJOR difference between who Srank is and who you're painting him to be.
Now I know this is probably a very foreign idea for you, but it IS hard to comprehend being wrong about something when you're taking a position in a debate that's most likely right. When you build your arguments off of consistent facts, probability based outcomes, and common logic... it's hard to find yourself on the wrong side of a debate....
Again I know that's really foreign for a guy who thinks there's nothing wrong with Punisher overpowering Tigershark in water... but whatever.
What I'd like to know is what makes you think you're ANY different than what you're accusing Srank of? How often do you barrage into threads and take an opposing stance to me, DDD, or Srank out of sheer spite alone, or with complete supposition or circumstantial evidence to support you.... or worse when you ignore all matters of context to try and prove something? What makes you better?
It's DEFINITELY not more absurd than stating that a writers intention about Blade being equals with Logan was more important than what took place on panel..... Something you've argued I believe...
And Srank interpreting artistic representation as a source of evidence at least makes MORE SENSE than you ignoring artistic interpretations, storyline, and substituting them both for your own theories and agendas that were NEVER mentioned, presented or suggested on panel..... something else you've done (*coughorigingsandendingscough*).
What I find amusing most is this demonizing of Srank's debating style, jumping down my throat whenever I have ANY opinion, or your hypocritical attacks on DDD supporting a side has us all look like a group of villains hell bent on ruining your stay at KMC.... of course ignoring the fact that you're the one flinging yourself at us in debates heated by your own petty emotions lond before we ever had a thought to even address you...
What is this? 5-6 years on KMC and you're not done crying? Man, get some Prosac..... or a woman... probably both.
I'm not even going to read that don't waste my time.
Originally posted by Deadline
The problem is you think you're right about everything. It doesn't just apply to Wolverine debates. Even your boy in the martial arts thread stated that you have a tendency to make sweeping generlisations and act like its fact.Your opinion can't be swayed because you can't comprehend that your ever wrong about anything. All you ever do is bend over backwards to disprove any opinion thats different from your own.
Stating that Negus didn't get hit because the impact marker was grey is one of the most absurd things I have ever heard. Then on top of that you started arguing that Negus was more vamped out against Spider-man than he was against Blade. That's not true theres no reason to think its true, you simply fabricate these excuses because you intended to do it before the debate started.
I don't think I'm right about everything, I think I'm right about the few things I bother to post on... which is why I post in the first place. There is a reason I don't have posts in Green Lantern or Dr. Strange threads, it's because I only post on matters I am knowledgeable in. My opinion has been swayed before and I've conceded many arguments on my KMC tenure... just never with trackz and snoop on the matter of Blade because - frankly - they have no idea what they are talking about. If I was wrong, and someone could prove I was wrong, I would happily admit it. The facts are that Blade has never displayed a valid healing feat on panel and that poetic hyperbole isn't an accurate account of events no matter how much Trackz would love to think they are.
I stated that Negus didn't get hit for several reason, a translucent impact marker was merely one of them, one of secondary importance and the only one you've decided to focus on. He didn't get hit because their was no wound or battle damage, the fact that the impact marker was translucent and that an impact marker on a slice doesn't make sense anyway are just secondary factors.
I showed pictures of what being vamped out looked like in that book, you even thought it was different enough that you tried to argue it was a different artist on a different book (which paints a pretty clear picture that you haven't even read the issue at hand btw) so obviously even you made a clear distinction between the two forms... and now you are trying to pretend they are the same? Come on, try to be object and non basis for once in your life.