Originally posted by Burning thought
Feats do not support your claims, both Raziel and Kain have above human statistics and have feats showing them quicker than humans, Link and Ganon on the other hand, not so much.... 3+ GJ is a lie, such numbers do not excist for Link.I dont see Link doing anything but looking at the thing. not to mension it looks like brick, bricks layed on top of eachother, not something as solid or as heavy as Raziels Obelisk. Its also thinner, despite being taller.
I never said that, reading comprehension ftw. Your trying to use a gameplay mechanic, then on top of that an assumption simply because it looks like lightning. Poor play, poor debate argument.
GJ ignoring evidence again. Your first point is basicly that you don't actually pay attention. Thanks.
It's MUCH taller, and thinner is debatable, and Link drives it into the floor below like a nail.
K, now you're dancing around it again, you're just repeating yourself in different ways and trying to disguise you're flawed argument. IE, you actually believe Ganondorf would sabotage himself, or you're trolling.
Math tiem; because j00 love it.
Link is 151 pixels tall, each section of the pillar in the image, from the top of one dotted line to the top of the next, is 174 pixels on the left side, farthest from the camera, if Link is 6', this makes the edge a minimum of 6.9 feet in height per section.
Horizonatally, the pillar is 297 pixels, not accounting for foreshortening OR the angle which adds another 25 pixels. Minimum of 11.8 feet. Is actually closer to: 12.7
So, the pillar is square based, so it's base*height for volume per section, base is: 163, or 139 depeinding on which measurement you use. height is 6.9,
that's either 960.7 cubic feet of volume per section or 1124.7 cubic feet. Note also that the pillar is infact solid in it's core as shown in the bottom image. The texture pack I had just added the brick texture, and is not the canon texture for the pillar.
You can easily count 12 sections of pillar in the first image without approaching the bottom, where there could easily be 5 more, or more! The bottom image displays very clearly that 12 is a thoroughly inadequate number. But I'll use 12. 🙂
Now, let's assume various densities;
65 lbs/foot, the approximate density of water:
Minimum per section: 31 tons.
Maximum per section: 36 tons
Total weight for 12 sections: 374 tons, or 438.6 tons.
100 lbs/foot, close to something like sand or gravel (Lolimpossibly light.):
Minimum per section: 48 tons.
Maximum per section: 56 tons.
Total weight per 12 sections: 674 tons, or 576.4 tons.
150 lbs/foot, a fair/average weight for most types of stone, too light for granite, which is the most common stone building material the world over:
Minimum weight per section: 72 tons.
Maximum weight per section: 84 tons.
Total weight per 12 sections: 1012.2 tons, or 864.6 tons.
See where I am going with this?