Mass Effect 3

Started by Nephthys64 pages

YouTube video

I miss Legion so ****ing much. haermm

That singing was so much win.

I_H3uWLW3N4&feature=related

3 things to share:

'Imagine you are a deer. One day, as you stumble through the woods, you come across an area where there is a tall fence that keeps predators away. The terrain has been cleared for you, making it easy to move. Best of all, you find a mysterious device that dispenses food that never seems to run out. You grow fat and happy and all the other deer come around and you have a nice herd going.

Then, one day, out of the blue, a mysterious creature blows your brains out, drags your ass away into a strange structure, rips your guts out and dismembers you, eats your flesh, and puts your head on its wall.

That is what the Reapers do to us. Now, in theory, the government permits deer hunters to hunt to prevent overpopulation, reduce the risk of automobile accidents involving deer, control disease, and for sport.

We don't tell the deer that, do we?'

Why couldn't they just leave the Reapers as that? 😬

YouTube video

What. The. ****?

I-I think we might have broken Bioware. qshock

Originally posted by Nephthys
What. The. ****?

I-I think we might have broken Bioware. qshock

😆 One of the video's that came up was Gamer Poop.

It looks like a bunch of random Mass Effect 3 things from all over the internet. Dunno what it's suppose to be for, really.

April Fools.

Originally posted by BackFire
April Fools.

Could be. But I think the "fooling" part is a bit too abstract to be functional.

Lemme respond with what some may already be thinking of what I just said:

"Oh boy...here comes the 'April Fools' panel."

I know, I know. But their "fooling" leaves something to be desired.

PAX is this Saturday, right? That's when they will be announcing what they plan to do about this... controversy?

YouTube video

You'd think it'd make a lot more sense with a Krogan playing the drums.

Anyways, still better than the ending.

Jimquisition- Changing A Game's Ending And Destroying Art.

An internet reviewer admits that he was kinda wrong and changes his opinion after doing more research? WHAT FREAKISH DIMENSION HAVE I STUMBLED INTO!?

Fair play Sterling, fair play.

http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/mass-effect-3/1222085p1.html

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/116661-BioWare-Announces-Post-Ending-DLC-for-Mass-Effect-3-Updated

Doesn't look like the indoctrination theory is happening

Originally posted by jalek moye
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/116661-BioWare-Announces-Post-Ending-DLC-for-Mass-Effect-3-Updated

Doesn't look like the indoctrination theory is happening

Well %^&@.

BioWare concludes the FAQ by saying, "Are we proud of the game we made and the team that made it? Hell yes. Are we going to change the ending of the game? No. Do we appreciate the passion and listen to the feedback delivered to us by our fans? Very much so

Translation:

As I understand, wouldn't the Indoctrination Theory be more of a clarification then "changing" the ending?

Though it's nice to see that it will at least be free.

So whats the odds this makes the ending even shittier? Can it get any shittier?

Like, if the 'clarification' is basically:

Spoiler:
'Yes, destroying the mass relays does wipe out most life in the galaxy. Yes, Shepard is dead, thats just an easter egg. Yes, Tali and Garrus slowly starve to death as does the fleet stuck on Earth. You wanted a new ending heres your new ending!'
Because that would be pretty funny (for 5 seconds).

I would probably start worshipping Bioware instead of Kojima as the new Troll Gods.

In some of the following tweets from Bioware reps today they said that it would be possible to

Spoiler:
repair/replace the Mass Relays in certain endings.

Link please! :3

http://www.reddit.com/r/masseffect/comments/ruz0u/merizan_crew_reunited_possible_in_some_scenarios/

Several twitter links in the above link. Some may consider info spoilers, nothing very specific or major though.

Well alright then