Originally posted by BackFire
Agreed. Post trilogy is the only real option if they want your choices to be at all meaningful.Though I don't agree that they'd have to choose a canon ending for ME3. I don't believe it'd be as difficult to implement the possibilities of all the endings into the next game as it initially seems. When you think about it, what are the major differences between each ending and how they'd affect the galaxy?
There are reapers or there aren't reapers. There are Geth or there aren't Geth. Everyone has shiny Synthesis skin or they don't. There are pretty easy to explain ways around all of these. Assuming the game is set a 200-1000 years after the third game, they'd just have to make The Reapers/Geth not in it very much and not consequential to the main storyline of the new games.
And they could say that the Synthesis skin/eyes was only a temporary symptom of the merged existence and now everyone is back to having normal skin/eyes.
See, this is a fundamental problem with the 'big choice' conclusion and then a sequel. Either a. it means you have to make several entirely different plotlines for the sequel, or b. you do as you say- but if you do that, you are openly demonstrating that the oh-so-important choice made originally was actually trivial and it didn't really matter what you did.