Thanos vs Superman/WWH melee

Originally posted by h1a8
Proof above that either you are completely dumb or a super troll (purposely say misleading shyte to convince others of a lie).

First of all, the Odin fight was full of energy blasts. The Zues fight was purely physically for the most part. No comparison can be made there.

Finally, Superman alone would beat Thanos 10/10 in a straight melee fight. He's much stronger and much much faster.

Originally posted by quanchi112
I say this because I've seen the Hulk on panel look pathetic by comparison. I've also seen Zeus utterly humiliate Hulk hand to hand. Thanos pre upgrade did far better and didn't go down against Odin while Hulk was beaten like a mule. You like the Hulk but if you were being objective he doesn't even come close.

I like the Mad Titan but i'm not going to overrate him, beating the strongest Hulk yet and Superman at the same time in h2h is just something I don't see Thanos pulling off.

Originally posted by The Sorrow
Last time I checked Thanos was no Zeus and when Odin got physical with him he EASILY manhandled Thanos. Thanks for the lulz.
This was also the before the bump up the totem pole skyfathers seemed to have received in recent years. The facts are Thanos has done nothing in his history that indicates Hulk wouldn't give a him a good fight in melee only.

I like the Mad Titan but i'm not going to overrate him, beating the strongest Hulk yet and Superman at the same time in h2h is just something I don't see Thanos pulling off.

Thanos beats the snot out of the surfer without even trying. Recently he just punked Lord Mar-vell who was above top tier level in power. It isn't even close, sally.

Originally posted by The Sorrow
Last time I checked Thanos was no Zeus and when Odin got physical with him he EASILY manhandled Thanos. Thanks for the lulz.
This was also the before the bump up the totem pole skyfathers seemed to have received in recent years. Fact is Thanos has done nothing in his history that indicates Hulk wouldn't give a him a good fight in melee only tbh.

I like the Mad Titan but i'm not going to overrate him, beating the strongest Hulk yet and Superman at the same time in h2h is just something I don't see Thanos pulling off.

This. Hulk actually did something Thanos failed to do and that was punch a high end skyfather across the fighting arena.

As far as how both did against their respective skyfathers, Thanos was more impressive. Thanos was basically unable to do anything to Odin but hulk didnt do much to Zeus either besides getting that one shot in while Zeus was talking to Hera.

As far as how they both took the damage though....Thanos pulled some impressive shit. Him actually wading through the gungir blast and grabbing it was pretty beastly. Hulk on the other hand....

Originally posted by quanchi112
Thanos was running through energy blasts. The first energy blast didn't even phase Thanos. Hulk was ko'd. Zeus and Odin are described as peers in power. Thanos has treated the Hulk like an opinionated woman. One slap here and knocking her head together into one of her friends heads there.

Thanos beats the snot out of the surfer without even trying. Recently he just punked Lord Mar-vell who was above top tier level in power. It isn't even close, sally.

Physically beating up Surfer is something both Green Scar and Superman could do, as is beating up on Thing and Merged Hulk which is pretty weaksauce in comparison to feats Supes and Hulk have. Mar-vell never did anything strength related in the whole arc 😕

Originally posted by quanchi112
Zeus ko'd him with one energy attack. 😂 Then he took him on physically because power vs. power it would have even been more lopsided. H1, you don't read comics. Nothing you can exists outside your own mind. Thanos would drum Superman 10/10. Smarter, more durable, more powerful, while he can negate speed.

In case you don't know this is a melee fight. So energy blasts has nothing to do with anything. The Odin fight has nothing to do with the Zues fight as the Zues fight was largely physical.

Thanos can't negate Superman's speed. Being able to block beams from 20 feet away or more isn't enough. Why? Because humans can hit 90mph straight fastballs but can't hit a 5 mph fly buzzing around randomly. Superman using his speed isn't always going to be straight but rather randomly around Thanos and tearing his asss up.

Originally posted by Damborgson
As far as how both did against their respective skyfathers, Thanos was more impressive. Thanos was basically unable to do anything to Odin but hulk didnt do much to Zeus either besides getting that one shot in while Zeus was talking to Hera.

As far as how they both took the damage though....Thanos pulled some impressive shit. Him actually wading through the gungir blast and grabbing it was pretty beastly. Hulk on the other hand....

It isn't the same since the Odin fight was energy blasts and the Zues fight was more physical. This is a physical fight so bringing up the Odin fight is a deflection in the least.

Originally posted by The Sorrow
Let's be honest Odin wasn't anywhere close to going all-out, that first blast on Thanos was clearly weaker than the blast Zeus hit Hulk with. Also Zeus attacked Hulk from behind, Thanos was ready and braced, that's a significant difference.

What?

Zeus was playing with Hulk.

Odin was going all out on Thanos, because Thanos had incased Thor in a pure energy block, and beat the shit out of everything with his crew of homeboys that wasn't Odin or Thor in Asgard.

If anything, Thanos was the one who didn't go all out, since he was there to speak with Odin in the first place.

Not saying that Thanos would have won, IMO, Odin beat him good, but Thanos evolve on way more powerful sphere of power that either Superman and Hulk.

Thanos murder them.

Originally posted by Bouboumaster
What?

Zeus was playing with Hulk.

Odin was going all out on Thanos, because Thanos had incased Thor in a pure energy block, and beat the shit out of everything with his crew of homeboys that wasn't Odin or Thor in Asgard.

If anything, Thanos was the one who didn't go all out, since he was there to speak with Odin in the first place.

Not saying that Thanos would have won, IMO, Odin beat him good, but Thanos evolve on way more powerful sphere of power that either Superman and Hulk.

Thanos murder them.

Odin offered Thanos the chance to surrender/yield that isn't going all out, he underestimated Thanos to begin with and proceeded to up ante which Thanos couldn't live with and was beaten down. He managed to stand at the end but his attacks did nothing to Odin.

This thread is about melee, I believe Thanos is most durable here but Hulk is only going to get stronger, tougher etc the longer the fight and this WILL be a drawn out fight even without Superman. That is key here.

Originally posted by Damborgson
As far as how both did against their respective skyfathers, Thanos was more impressive. Thanos was basically unable to do anything to Odin but hulk didnt do much to Zeus either besides getting that one shot in while Zeus was talking to Hera.

As far as how they both took the damage though....Thanos pulled some impressive shit. Him actually wading through the gungir blast and grabbing it was pretty beastly. Hulk on the other hand....

I'm surprised people are suggesting Hulk did better against a skyfather than Thanos. Hulk fought Zeus who handicapped himself to H2H, and was puking his guts out after. If it wasn't H2H and Zeus used other powers he would've been one-shotted (which happened in the beginning). The only reason Hulk affected Zeus at all is because of a sneak attack.

Thanos fought an Odin NOT handicapped to H2H, and although he was beaten, he sustained no where near the damage Hulk did. Put Hulk in Thanos' place when he fought Odin, and he'd be one-shotted like Surfer and like he was by Zeus' lightning.

Conclusion? Thanos' durability and damage soak is far superior to Hulk's using their skyfather fights.

Originally posted by The Sorrow
Based on what? Going by Zeus' words at the end of the book contradict him playing around. In fact Zeus showed Hulk no mercy unlike Odin did with Thanos, he wanted to teach Hulk a lesson.

Odin offered Thanos the chance to surrender/yield that isn't going all out, he underestimated Thanos to begin with and proceeded to up ante which Thanos couldn't live with and was beaten down. He managed to stand at the end but his attacks did nothing to Odin.

This thread is about melee, I believe Thanos is most durable here but Hulk is only going to get stronger, tougher etc the longer the fight and this WILL be a drawn out fight even without Superman. That is key here.

I think Thanos can amp to the point his punches actually did something to Odin, while Zeus wasn't able to do jack shit.

I don't think either Hulk or Superman has the firepower to actually hurt Thanos at all. I think that Thanos crush them both. He already did it to Hulk and his hommies, after all (which included Hercules, Thor and Thing).

Originally posted by Bouboumaster
I think Thanos can amp to the point his punches actually did something to Odin, while Zeus wasn't able to do jack shit.

I don't think either Hulk or Superman has the firepower to actually hurt Thanos at all. I think that Thanos crush them both.

He already did it to Hulk and his hommies, after all (which included Hercules, Thor and Thing).

Originally posted by The Sorrow
Great, he beat Prof Hulk and Thing and took on the Avengers. Hulk does stuff like this every other month. What physical feats does Thanos have that justifies him crushing Superman and Hulk at the same time? And with the ease you implied?

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Because Professor Hulk and Thing are obviously comparable to Superman and WWH. duryes

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Because Professor Hulk and Thing are obviously comparable to Superman and WWH. duryes

Thor and Hercules were also in the mix.

And I believe that Professor Hulk, Thing, Hercules and Thor >> Green Scar and Superman

^ Thanos wasn't bonking Masterson Thor or Hercules' heads.

I think Mon-EL and Lobo are superior to Superman also. Didn't stop Superman from bonking their heads once.

Originally posted by Bouboumaster
I think Thanos can amp to the point his punches actually did something to Odin, while Zeus wasn't able to do jack shit.

I don't think either Hulk or Superman has the firepower to actually hurt Thanos at all. I think that Thanos crush them both. He already did it to Hulk and his hommies, after all (which included Hercules, Thor and Thing).

Thanos feats against energy projection doesn't translate complete (if at all) to him being able to withstand blunt force. Thor slamming on Thanos would definitely hurt him. Plus you are not considering other things:

1. Superman's speed advantage
2. Hulk's ability to heal and grow stronger and more durable

Superman alone would beat Thanos in a melee fight mostly because of the speed advantage and partially due to a slight strength advantage.

Originally posted by The Sorrow
Let's be honest Odin wasn't anywhere close to going all-out, that first blast on Thanos was clearly weaker than the blast Zeus hit Hulk with. Also Zeus attacked Hulk from behind, Thanos was ready and braced, that's a significant difference.

Physically beating up Surfer is something both Green Scar and Superman could do, as is beating up on Thing and Merged Hulk which is pretty weaksauce in comparison to feats Supes and Hulk have. Mar-vell never did anything strength related in the whole arc 😕

Saying they could beat up the Surfer while not having done so themselves isn't the same thing as Thanos completely destroying him. The Surfer has always done well against the Hulk but again who cares about continuity right ?

Mar-vell had access to his powers and was able to fend of the Nova and Surfer easily. Thanos treated him like a week feeb. Thanos would treat both of them like weak feebs.

Originally posted by h1a8
In case you don't know this is a melee fight. So energy blasts has nothing to do with anything. The Odin fight has nothing to do with the Zues fight as the Zues fight was largely physical.

Thanos can't negate Superman's speed. Being able to block beams from 20 feet away or more isn't enough. Why? Because humans can hit 90mph straight fastballs but can't hit a 5 mph fly buzzing around randomly. Superman using his speed isn't always going to be straight but rather randomly around Thanos and tearing his asss up.

Shields. Superman can't touch him. Negated.

Originally posted by h1a8
Thanos feats against energy projection doesn't translate complete (if at all) to him being able to withstand blunt force.

Why is that? What if it was concussion blast?