Dr. Doom vs Thanos

Originally posted by quanchi112
Not nessicarily.But OK.

But the only reason he survived so long is because of his will.That or you think his durability>LT's.

Since when?If this is true then he would change what he looks like.He was treated fine on titan but felt he was a freak.If this was true he could look like whatever he want. And that still has nothing to do with anti-matter.

Thanos is made of matter.Matter and anit-matter destroy each other.Logically it should kill thanos and if Odin is made of matter is should kill or at least do some bad damage to him.

Exactly.It says he was weakened.He just wasn't as weakened as you are making him out to be.

Not really....

Yes.Exactly.Thanos should be able to kill low heralds with ease.This in no way proves he was that weakened though.

Heres how the fight goes: Marvell hits thanos, thanos hits mar-vell,thanos grabs mar-vell and slams him into the ground, thanos drops mar-vell and wants mar-vell to kill him. No owning happened.None.No domination of any kind.

Except it didn't show an increase in power.A low skyfather 1 shotting low heralds isn't that hard.He should logically have been able to do it before TI.

I ask for scans for you to prove your point.Even if you read all of a characters showings you won't remember them all.So the other person provides scans to prove you wrong.And seeing as you have never posted scans or had a reputable member back you up you've never proven me wrong.

Except it is fanboyism and wanking.How clear can it get when you say thanos dominated mar-vell.No domination happened.And Quans even worse saying that Odin failed to drop thanps when thanos failed to drop mar-vell.

Its not impressive.Not when you silver bullet is weak compared to you.

No its not impressive.

2: Except it'd be more like fighting a werepoodle.Its also very very weak compared to you.Thus killing it isn't impressive.

3: Yes...you do 😬. Your just using baseless claims.I win you lose.Claims mean nothing without feats.Otherwise sentry stalemated galactus.

4: No you just wanked the fight.Read my post above to nihilist.No domination happened.

5: Which has nothing to do with what I said.Nice dodge/troll/bash.

Thanos only beat Maker because she was in a vulnerable state.When she wasn't show one-shotted him 😬

It makes a lot of sense.You just can't grasp it.

My post begins here.

The silver bullet negates your powers. That means they don't function the way they do against anyone else. This makes the feat undeniably awesome.

2.So my reasoning above and if you don't like it email andy schmidt who works for marvel.

3.Feats don't prove anything they have always been window dressing how these characters match up against characters with feats matters. This shows who is stronger not the feats by themselves. That was a tremendous showing of durability considering the manner in which it was described on panel and how it broke off against his skin.

4.No, I called it how it went you don't understand pictures or words.

5.You didn't read the fight saying what you are saying.

She was still in that same vulnerable state when she oneshot ko'd him he was prepared the second time and stomped her. You didn't read it if you thought her form changed the first time. [/B][/QUOTE] Drax does not negate thanos's power.Drax was at an advantage of killing thanos.Thanos was at no disadvantage of killing Drax.This makes it not impressive.

2: What?

3: Feats don't mean anything durpalm. Can some mod correct this shit?Quan actually thinks we don't use feats to debate. By feats the sword has no feats thus its not impressive.

4: Except no domination happened.You obviously didn't read their fight.Not if you think thanos beat mar-vell.

5: No you obviously didn't.There major hypocrisy in saying that Odin didn't beat thanos because he failed to KO thanos but thanos beat Mar-vell even though thanos also failed to drop mar-vell and even do that much damage to him as mar-vell was fine 5 seconds later.

Exactly.The only reason he won was because she was in a vulnerable state

@ blackbolt

http://forums.comicbookresources.com/showpost.php?p=3973564&postcount=1908

It's pretty simple, really. Drax has other powers that precent Thanos' natural Eternal-atom-control thing from working when he's around. Remember, Drax was created to kill Thanos. He probably couldn't beat Thor in a fight, heck, he'd have a tough time beating Wolverine perhaps, but Thanos he can kill.

He neagtes his powers it's why ripping his heart out would only kill him or any eternal because his energies make Thanos' powers when he's around quit working. This is per andy schmidt who works for marvel. I already posted it once you ignored it. It doesn't get any more official than this.

2.Andy schmidt answered questions on cbr about eveyr little minor issue with regards to annihilation and this was certainly posed. Page 128. I am so good at what I do I swear.

3.Feats are window dressing and quit crying for mods every post. The writer made this feat of Thanos' very impressive with the dialogue he chose.

4.Choking someone till their eyes practically pop out while tossing them around like a ragdoll is dominating someone. Ask anyone that and see what they say irl or on here ?

5.I explained this already Thanos dominated whereas odin just respected Thanos. Point blank.

She still had the power to ko him and when Thanos was prepared he annihilated her so on in conclusion the only way she kos him is if he drops his guard which doesn't even apply to current more durable Thanos.

Originally posted by quanchi112
@ blackbolt

http://forums.comicbookresources.com/showpost.php?p=3973564&postcount=1908

It's pretty simple, really. Drax has other powers that precent Thanos' natural Eternal-atom-control thing from working when he's around. Remember, Drax was created to kill Thanos. He probably couldn't beat Thor in a fight, heck, he'd have a tough time beating Wolverine perhaps, but Thanos he can kill.

He neagtes his powers it's why ripping his heart out would only kill him or any eternal because his energies make Thanos' powers when he's around quit working. This is per andy schmidt who works for marvel. I already posted it once you ignored it. It doesn't get any more official than this.

2.Andy schmidt answered questions on cbr about eveyr little minor issue with regards to annihilation and this was certainly posed. Page 128. I am so good at what I do I swear.

3.Feats are window dressing and quit crying for mods every post. The writer made this feat of Thanos' very impressive with the dialogue he chose.

4.Choking someone till their eyes practically pop out while tossing them around like a ragdoll is dominating someone. Ask anyone that and see what they say irl or on here ?

5.I explained this already Thanos dominated whereas odin just respected Thanos. Point blank.

She still had the power to ko him and when Thanos was prepared he annihilated her so on in conclusion the only way she kos him is if he drops his guard which doesn't even apply to current more durable Thanos.

Yes.Because he was created to kill him.That had nothing to do with anti-matter and nothing to do with him killing drax.

Except thanos has done nothing of the like.Nor would he live long enough to create himself a new heart.Once you heart is out your kinda....dead.Drax does not negate thanos's powers.

2: Which still has nothing to do with anything

3: Except you would need feats for it to be imprssive.SO its not.

4: He didn't toss him around like a rag doll.He grabbed his neck.ANd mar-vell was completely fine.

5: And Odin dominated thanos.

Thanos isn't more durable.He only beat her because she was vulnerable.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
😂 He said galactus can't kill thanos.

Yes.Because he was created to kill him.That had nothing to do with anti-matter and nothing to do with him killing drax.

Except thanos has done nothing of the like.Nor would he live long enough to create himself a new heart.Once you heart is out your kinda....dead.Drax does not negate thanos's powers.

2: Which still has nothing to do with anything

3: Except you would need feats for it to be imprssive.SO its not.

4: He didn't toss him around like a rag doll.He grabbed his neck.ANd mar-vell was completely fine.

5: And Odin dominated thanos.

Thanos isn't more durable.He only beat her because she was vulnerable.

Drax's power negate Thanos' so Thanos killing someone who negates your powers is very impressive while weakened.

You don't even grasp how the eternals operate they control their own molecules meaning this wouldn't kill them. Drax negated his powers why else would Thanos say, interesting ? It makes perfect sense.

2.I verified why no one else can kill Thanos in the same manner. Ripping out his heart won't kill him if anyone else does it.

3.Iyo I unlike you grasp the writer's intent.

4.Reread the fight if you feel he didn't have his way with him.

5.Not according to Odin. Odin dominated Surfer and Drax not thanos.

Yes, he is. She was vulnerable the first time she ko'd him when he's ready she can't beat him.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Yes, that was his opinion about a fight that never happened but he stated why Drax was able to do so and it's clear Thanos' powers were negated.

Drax's power negate Thanos' so Thanos killing someone who negates your powers is very impressive while weakened.

You don't even grasp how the eternals operate they control their own molecules meaning this wouldn't kill them. Drax negated his powers why else would Thanos say, interesting ? It makes perfect sense.

2.I verified why no one else can kill Thanos in the same manner. Ripping out his heart won't kill him if anyone else does it.

3.Iyo I unlike you grasp the writer's intent.

4.Reread the fight if you feel he didn't have his way with him.

5.Not according to Odin. Odin dominated Surfer and Drax not thanos.

Yes, he is. She was vulnerable the first time she ko'd him when he's ready she can't beat him.

Except his powers weren't negated.You have nothing to prove this.

No it makes no sense.Even if he could create himself a new heart, which he can't as Marakkai(probably spelled it wrong), an eternal, didn't create a new heart when maelstrom stopped his.

2: Yes....it will.He'd be dead.You can't create something once youe dead.And that still has no relevance.

3: The writer can mean it to be impressive.Doesn't mean it was.Which it wasn't.If it is supposed to kill gods why didn't it kill ronan huh?

4: He didn't.Not by any means.I read it just last night.No owning happened.Get off thanos's dick.

5: He dominated thanos.If thanos dominated mar-vell then odin dominated thanos.Does matter if he respects him or not.Odin still made thanos his ***** and dominated him.

Yes she can.Him being ready has nothing to do with it.Just because you don't know whats coming doesn't make you less durable.So she can still one-shot him.And still the only reason he won was because she was vulnerable.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
No.Thanos powers were not negated.Thats not why thanos didn't make a new heart.Its because when you lose your heart your....y'know....dead.When your hearts gone you don't have any life to create a new heart.No powers were negated.Stop making excuses.

Except his powers weren't negated.You have nothing to prove this.

No it makes no sense.Even if he could create himself a new heart, which he can't as Marakkai(probably spelled it wrong), an eternal, didn't create a new heart when maelstrom stopped his.

2: Yes....it will.He'd be dead.You can't create something once youe dead.And that still has no relevance.

3: The writer can mean it to be impressive.Doesn't mean it was.Which it wasn't.If it is supposed to kill gods why didn't it kill ronan huh?

4: He didn't.Not by any means.I read it just last night.No owning happened.Get off thanos's dick.

5: He dominated thanos.If thanos dominated mar-vell then odin dominated thanos.Does matter if he respects him or not.Odin still made thanos his ***** and dominated him.

Yes she can.Him being ready has nothing to do with it.Just because you don't know whats coming doesn't make you less durable.So she can still one-shot him.And still the only reason he won was because she was vulnerable.

Humans can't control their own molecules so us being killed by having our own hearts ripped out doesn't apply to them.

Andy Schmidt's word. He created an entire annihilation thread in which he answered questions about the entire event over on cbr. You keep saying no you didn't when I proved it. I won't ever provide proof for you again since you are delusional.

Drax negated his powers so he couldn't and just died. A silver bullet kills a werewolf yet a rocket launcher fails. Oh forget it you don't understand any better.

2.I already backed up my case your nuh uh responses are childish and not actual counters.

3.So you just stated the writer can imply it yet it doesn't hold water because of feats. I guess in your world the writer doesn't matter even though he's creating the story.

4.Choking someone and slamming them around isn't dominating. What planet do you live on ?

5.False, he respected Thanos but never dominated him, ever.

So now in your world a cheapshot has no effect ? Wow. Nothing else needs to be said. Thanos owned her when ready. Thanos owns her when he;s ready for her as the comic clearly shows.

Originally posted by quanchi112
Andy Schmidt explained this. This is the guy who was in charge of annihilation if you say he's wrong you're just trolling he's not giving his opinion on what would happen he's giving his opinion on something that marvel published making it a fact.

Humans can't control their own molecules so us being killed by having our own hearts ripped out doesn't apply to them.

Andy Schmidt's word. He created an entire annihilation thread in which he answered questions about the entire event over on cbr. You keep saying no you didn't when I proved it. I won't ever provide proof for you again since you are delusional.

Drax negated his powers so he couldn't and just died. A silver bullet kills a werewolf yet a rocket launcher fails. Oh forget it you don't understand any better.

2.I already backed up my case your nuh uh responses are childish and not actual counters.

3.So you just stated the writer can imply it yet it doesn't hold water because of feats. I guess in your world the writer doesn't matter even though he's creating the story.

4.Choking someone and slamming them around isn't dominating. What planet do you live on ?

5.False, he respected Thanos but never dominated him, ever.

So now in your world a cheapshot has no effect ? Wow. Nothing else needs to be said. Thanos owned her when ready. Thanos owns her when he;s ready for her as the comic clearly shows.

Your point?You need your heart.Whether your thanos or not.

Except you just ignored what i said.Marakkai didn't create himself a new heart.Why?Hes an eternal just like thanos.Now you logic doesn't work.

No he didn't.If he negated his powers he wouldn't have been able to kill him.Once again your "logic" falls through.

2: And once again you ignore and it still has nothing to do with what i said.Quan your just looking foolish.

3: If the writer has a sword with no feats break on someone and its supposed to be uber thats his problem.He should have given it some feats.

4: No.Not when they are completely fine.Which mar-vell was.Then thanos was stabbed by a knife.

5: Yes it did.He dominated him much worse then thanos "dominatied" mar-vell.I'm seriously thinking about reporting you for trolling.Its ignoring fight on panel proof.

Except he doesn't.He got one-shot.So explain how in a non-vulnerable state he has the slightes chance against her.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
Except he didn't say that Drax negated thanos's powers.

Your point?You need your heart.Whether your thanos or not.

Except you just ignored what i said.Marakkai didn't create himself a new heart.Why?Hes an eternal just like thanos.Now you logic doesn't work.

No he didn't.If he negated his powers he wouldn't have been able to kill him.Once again your "logic" falls through.

2: And once again you ignore and it still has nothing to do with what i said.Quan your just looking foolish.

3: If the writer has a sword with no feats break on someone and its supposed to be uber thats his problem.He should have given it some feats.

4: No.Not when they are completely fine.Which mar-vell was.Then thanos was stabbed by a knife.

5: Yes it did.He dominated him much worse then thanos "dominatied" mar-vell.I'm seriously thinking about reporting you for trolling.Its ignoring fight on panel proof.

Except he doesn't.He got one-shot.So explain how in a non-vulnerable state he has the slightes chance against her.

ne·gate (n-gt) tr.v. ne·gat·ed, ne·gat·ing, ne·gates 1. To make ineffective or invalid; nullify. 2. To rule out; deny.

I feel like talking to someone whose in elementary. When schmidt says they prevent them from working that means nullify or negate.

This pertains to Thanos here and this is a fact it was stated by andy schmidt. Nothing you say can change that.

2.I am looking foolish when you need the definitions put up to show you what simple words mean. LOL.

3.The writer doesn't have to give it feats to make it powerful this is a sign of someone who doesn't grasp a story well.

4.Thanos dominated him and didn't try to kill him he showed he could manhandle him because once again he wasn't trying to kill him.

5.Nope. Thanos was fine after the fight. Odin failed completely in taking him down.

He was oneshotted because he wasn't ready then when he was he easily defeated her.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
It took Thanos 7-8 punches to kill Surfer and his punches was charged with cosmic energy, its like combining a punch from a class 100 with a energy blast from a high Trans/low skyfarther huge difference from 1 single blast.

facepalmMarvells punch didnt even hit Thanos, he was stopped from reaching him by Thanos hand. I honetsly dont think you have read the fight, Thanos made Marvell spit blood with a punch then slammed him into the ground followed up by nearly popping his eyes out of his head by choking him. Thanos dominated him and was in no danger at all, hell Thanos even said "he didnt want to win" and "just wanted to meet face to face".

He couldnt kill Phlya or Drax prviously in 1 shot, yet he did so easily this time, showing a invrease in power.

Debating is knowing something about a character you are arguing over, considering you say Thanos is one of your fave characters, yet you seem to know so little about him otherwise you wouldnt need scans of everything, so either way youre too lazy to learn/look uo who your debating or youre just doing it for the troll because being a fan you wouldnt need to ask for so many scans.

If youre not gonna bother answering this with any debate other than your usual trick of "fanboysim" "wanking" to cover for your lack of a decent argument dont bother as i have counter everything you posted.

Not nessicarily.But OK.

But the only reason he survived so long is because of his will.That or you think his durability>LT's.

Since when?If this is true then he would change what he looks like.He was treated fine on titan but felt he was a freak.If this was true he could look like whatever he want. And that still has nothing to do with anti-matter.

Thanos is made of matter.Matter and anit-matter destroy each other.Logically it should kill thanos and if Odin is made of matter is should kill or at least do some bad damage to him.

Exactly.It says he was weakened.He just wasn't as weakened as you are making him out to be.

Not really....

Yes.Exactly.Thanos should be able to kill low heralds with ease.This in no way proves he was that weakened though.

Heres how the fight goes: Marvell hits thanos, thanos hits mar-vell,thanos grabs mar-vell and slams him into the ground, thanos drops mar-vell and wants mar-vell to kill him. No owning happened.None.No domination of any kind.

Except it didn't show an increase in power.A low skyfather 1 shotting low heralds isn't that hard.He should logically have been able to do it before TI.

I ask for scans for you to prove your point.Even if you read all of a characters showings you won't remember them all.So the other person provides scans to prove you wrong.And seeing as you have never posted scans or had a reputable member back you up you've never proven me wrong.

Except it is fanboyism and wanking.How clear can it get when you say thanos dominated mar-vell.No domination happened.And Quans even worse saying that Odin failed to drop thanps when thanos failed to drop mar-vell.

Its not impressive.Not when you silver bullet is weak compared to you.

No its not impressive.

2: Except it'd be more like fighting a werepoodle.Its also very very weak compared to you.Thus killing it isn't impressive.

3: Yes...you do 😬. Your just using baseless claims.I win you lose.Claims mean nothing without feats.Otherwise sentry stalemated galactus.

4: No you just wanked the fight.Read my post above to nihilist.No domination happened.

5: Which has nothing to do with what I said.Nice dodge/troll/bash.

Thanos only beat Maker because she was in a vulnerable state.When she wasn't show one-shotted him 😬

It makes a lot of sense.You just can't grasp it. [/B]

Think about it like this guys...

Classic Beyonder was more powerful than every single being Thanos has ever beaten COMBINED by a factor of 1 million+...and Doom beat him.

This passes the common sense test; Dooms best feat CRUSHES Thanos's by an infinite amount...

There can be no question; Victor Von Doom PWNS Thanos of Titan...

🙂

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Think about it like this guys...

Classic Beyonder was more powerful than every single being Thanos has ever beaten COMBINED by a factor of 1 million+...and Doom beat him.

This passes the common sense test; Dooms best feat CRUSHES Thanos's by an infinite amount...

There can be no question; Victor Von Doom [b]PWNS Thanos of Titan...

🙂 [/B]

Classic Beyonder=Secret Wars 1 and 2...read em and weep!

Again, Classic Beyonder was a 1 million+ times more powerful than EVERYONE Thanos has ever beaten combined...sorry pal, Thanos has nothing on that.

Dooms best feat>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Thanos best feat.

Doom rape stomps him...

🙂

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Classic Beyonder=Secret Wars 1 and 2...read em and weep!

Again, Classic Beyonder was a 1 million+ times more powerful than EVERYONE Thanos has ever beaten combined...sorry pal, Thanos has nothing on that.

Dooms best feat>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Thanos best fea.

Doom rape stomps him...

🙂

I am right like usual.

1 million+ times!!!!

Oh man...Doom owns...besides, all you have to do is summon the NYPD and watch Thanos start to tremble in fear.

🙂

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
1 million+ times!!!!

Oh man...Doom owns...besides, all you have to do is summon the NYPD and watch Thanos start to tremble in fear.

🙂

Doom has the greatest feat ever in comics...he beat Classic Beyonder.

And no one...not even Thanos of Titan...has a feat that is even remotely comparable to this; Doom wins!

💃

Originally posted by TheLordofMurder
Doom has the greatest feat ever in comics...he beat Classic Beyonder.

And no one...not even Thanos of Titan...has a feat that is even remotely comparable to this; Doom wins!

💃

I don't know, Thanos getting a beatdown from Odin was very impressive, so was losing to Squirrel Girl.

Oh, you meant impressive for Thanos. nevermind. 🤣

Originally posted by Silent Master
I don't know, Thanos getting a beatdown from Odin was very impressive, so was losing to Squirrel Girl.

Oh, you meant impressive for Thanos. nevermind. 🤣

++

Is blunder up to his blunderous ways again... He didn't even read SW 1 or 2... We know this because he can't even name beyonders best feat. All he can do is quote hyperbole that he picked up on the forum. Way to live up to your name LordofBlunder

What Have I done... 🙁