Originally posted by quanchi112wait let me get this straight:
The writer never implied one.
1.) superman gets his strength from yellow sun radiation
2.) you get more radiation the closer you are to the sun
3.) superman was close enough to the sun that pretty much anyone or anything wouldve been incinerated
yet the writer has to state that he was getting a boost from being close to the sun for it to have happened?
Originally posted by Lord_Talron
wait let me get this straight:1.) superman gets his strength from yellow sun radiation
2.) you get more radiation the closer you are to the sun
3.) superman was close enough to the sun that pretty much anyone or anything wouldve been incineratedyet the writer has to state that he was getting a boost from being close to the sun for it to have happened?
(Just walk away from it. Quan has been being intellectually dishonest about this topic, and a few others, for years now apparently. Nothing short of Diana's lasso actually existing in real life could force the truth out of him in this situation... just walk away...)
Originally posted by Lord_TalronJust because one writer has superman gain more power from being close to the sun aka against Seid doesn't mean all writers do so. I get this is his power but writers still can portray him as they want to and I see no reason to suggest he was portrayed like he was against Seid.
wait let me get this straight:1.) superman gets his strength from yellow sun radiation
2.) you get more radiation the closer you are to the sun
3.) superman was close enough to the sun that pretty much anyone or anything wouldve been incineratedyet the writer has to state that he was getting a boost from being close to the sun for it to have happened?
Originally posted by quanchi112no, its fact that the closer you get to the sun the more radiation you are exposed to. in fact supes should get an amp just by leaving earth because of the earths atmosphere shielding the earth from solar radiation 😎
Just because one writer has superman gain more power from being close to the sun aka against Seid doesn't mean all writers do so. I get this is his power but writers still can portray him as they want to and I see no reason to suggest he was portrayed like he was against Seid.
Originally posted by tideoftimethats ok, i kno what im dealing with and i enjoy it. as does he im sure
(Just walk away from it. Quan has been being intellectually dishonest about this topic, and a few others, for years now apparently. Nothing short of Diana's lasso actually existing in real life could force the truth out of him in this situation... just walk away...)
Originally posted by Lord_TalronThat's only if the writer decides to portray him as dramatically stronger in his story as each writer varies and one had him sundipped whereas we've never seen anything like that nor will probably again. All comes down to the writer and I don't see him being portrayed as amped at all in this scene.
no, its fact that the closer you get to the sun the more radiation you are exposed to. in fact supes should get an amp just by leaving earth because of the earths atmosphere shielding the earth from solar radiation 😎
Originally posted by quanchi112
Just because one writer has superman gain more power from being close to the sun aka against Seid doesn't mean all writers do so. I get this is his power but writers still can portray him as they want to and I see no reason to suggest he was portrayed like he was against Seid.
Multiple writers do, it's standard for him.
Originally posted by Q99No, I disagree it should be but isn't always the case.
Multiple writers do, it's standard for him.
Originally posted by KontonHe's always had this level of power imo.
Welp, by this logic, I guess we don't actually know that they were even near the sun because the narration left that part out... I suppose this means he never punched her that far back to earth at all!