Cross Genre Match #21: Frieza vs Thanos

Originally posted by The Scenario
But do you know what it does take away from a character?

Mostly, the infallibility that everyone seems to place on them. It takes away a character's credibility when they say they can do something. It establishes that, when a character says something, they can be wrong.

Superman failed to do someting he said he would? Yes, he was wrong. Thanos lost the guantlet? He was wrong. Wolverine can't cut something? He was wrong, too. Now, when all of these characters have been wrong, why do you insist that Cell, this one time, is right? Especially when he fails just like all the others. Why do you insist that Freiza is right despite being wrong before repeatedly? Just because other comic characters are wrong doesn't make Freiza or Cell automatically right.

You are right when you say it doesn't take away from a character's ability. But when that character has been wrong before, we do not simply trust that they have an ability that they say they do.

When did frieza or cell lie about their power? That is what I am telling you that I don't get.

Originally posted by carver9
When did frieza or cell lie about their power? That is what I am telling you that I don't get.

Buu Vs. Thanos would have been a better match.

Originally posted by illadelph12
Buu Vs. Thanos would have been a better match.

And I would give buu the win in that match just due to absorption ability.

Originally posted by Creshosk
one sided questioning?

Originally posted by Starscream M
so why are you asking carver to prove things that you're not demanding of proof from the marvel side?

Carver hasn't backed up any of his claims. So even if hes not taking a side its logical to want carver to back up his claims.

The thanos side has.

Originally posted by illadelph12
Buu Vs. Thanos would have been a better match.

Cell vs thanos would've been a better match imo.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
He doesn't have to. And the marvel side is providing proof.

Carver hasn't backed up any of his claims. So even if hes not taking a side its logical to want carver to back up his claims.

The thanos side has.

Originally posted by Starscream M
not sure...I think buu would've been too much for thanos.

Cell vs thanos would've been a better match imo.

Got some reports from this thread.

I would be very careful when posting tonight. If a global comes up on this thread due to senseless bickering it won't be good.

pr is watching you all.

And if this goes badly, I will shut the cross genre threads down. sneer

Originally posted by Black bolt z
I still laugh at what buu would look like after absorbing thanos.

And I would give buu the win in that match just due to absorption ability.

Thanos would never be careless enough to let Buu absrob him.

who's that in your avatar, tyrant?

Originally posted by SuperMan103
who's that in your avatar, tyrant?

Holyfield.

why do you have 'better than tyson' then? only muhammad ali and chaves is greater than tyson.

Because Holyfield has a 2-0 on Tyson. And there are at least 5 other fighters other than Ali, Holyfield, and Chavez (not Chaves) who at their primes were better than Tyson.

Originally posted by Starscream M
no, carver has provided proof...but everything he provides, you guys just shoot it down. that's different than if he actually doesn't point to any feats.

This...

I'm glad that SOMEONE recognized this.

Originally posted by Starscream M
not sure...I think buu would've been too much for thanos.

Cell vs thanos would've been a better match imo.

I can show one feat that would show that cell would conpletely destroy thanos.

Originally posted by carver9
This...

I'm glad that SOMEONE recognized this.

Originally posted by carver9
I can show one feat that would show that cell would conpletely destroy thanos.

Originally posted by TheTyrant
Thanos would never be careless enough to let Buu absrob him.

Originally posted by Black bolt z
He doesn't have to. And the marvel side is providing proof.

Carver hasn't backed up any of his claims. So even if hes not taking a side its logical to want carver to back up his claims.

The thanos side has.

What haven't I provided?

What have you all provided besides thanos taking on surfer and thanos destroying a planetoid.

Originally posted by carver9
What haven't I provided?

What have you all provided besides thanos taking on surfer and thanos destroying a planetoid.

And you still haven't proven Freiza can KO thanos. He doesn't have the power to.

His punching power and durability is a tiny fraction of thanos's.