Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Sigh. Yet another poster that believes that being a condescending ass is a viable debating technique.
It's not a viable tactic, logical arguments are. You should try them from time to time. The fact that you're feeling backed into a corner is not me being condescending, it's you being wrong.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
I swear, the majority of Superman fanbois seem to have this in common.
Oh, how you've hurt the "Superman fanboy" community.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
It's sad, I HAD a lot of respect for you as a debater prior to this, but if you're not gonna conduct yourself respectfully to your fellow posters, then neither am I.
Aw, the "I thought so much more of you before this!" card. Well, I'm sorry to say I don't share this opinion, I knew how bright you were going into this discussion. But I was bored, so I decided to have some fun.
Now, to the actual discussion and getting over the drama queening.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Wow. Is THAT how you interpret that instance? The fact that the writer seems to strongly point out that the Hulk's attack had no effect at all on the Surfer thru that instance escapes you??
"Hulk had him on his knees after the attack, eventough as he delivered the attack he had to break free of Silver Surfer’s attack trying to stop him. " Which of this part is me interpreting that scene, and which is actually directly presenting what was shown in the issue?
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Your argument is only viable as a "common occurrence" if you ignore the fact that in those 2 instances:1) Surfer was (other than being tossed around) COMPLETELY unaffected by BRB's strongest blows. This is the same BRB that was busting planets during that arc. You trying to downplay the feat, notwithstanding.
ermmnone
Other than getting knocked the **** off of his board, and resorting to using it to knock Bill in the back of the head instead of continuing the frontal assault - that ended in him being on his ass, he was COMPLETLY FINE! You're right, Surfer should have bled or been knocked out. That's a true sign of him being affected.
He got knocked on his ass by two attacks from a second-rate Thor, and resorted to *****-tactics in order to gain the advantage. You going "but there were no .. umm... bruises and stuff" is the typical bullshittery that I don't have time for.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
2) You can argue the Herc (see Chaos War) incident, but it happened on-panel and trying to discredit it by using a condescending posting tone really doesn't prove your point.[...]
2) This was Odin, the highest skyfather out there who would KTFO Superman easily with one hit as well (you wanna debate that fact?).
I love how you fell right into that one.
You use skyfather+ Herc as viable durability feat for Surfer and at the same time don't dispute Odin KTFO him easily as PIS (at least you chose the best of the two wrongs, am I right? 😂). Which one is it an accurate representation of Surfer, Chaos War Hercules not being able to knock him out or Odin being able to? Let's take this analysis a step further. Was Hercules using the full extent of his powers? Was Hercules even aware of the full extent of his powers? What are the chances that Hercules risked killing Surfer and used one of the skyfather+ attacks?
I want the scans btw. Now.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
1) Thor here was arguably amped by his rage.3) BOTH of the instances where you presented scans were pre-Annihilation Surfer.
Beta Ray Bill was going toe to toe with the same Thor and got the better of him. There have been numerous debates and the amp is questionable to say the least.
Surfer never got any upgrade. He was just restored.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Yeah, the same Doomsday who took how long to get out of an alien coffin and bust out of the ground? :-/All the combined force of DDs and Superman's punches did in that arc was shatter nearby glass...
Yeah, he SURE is impressive. Geez, how did I fail to see that?? 😮 You, sir, have shown me the light.
FYi, common consensus in the forum is that BRB would decisively beat DOS Doomsday.
http://www.killermovies.com/forums/showthread.php?threadid=406569&pagenumber=3
But I'm sure you believe differently.
haermm
I was expecting it, but I still laughed. I love you how get into stuff you either have absolutly no clue on.
Doomsday was weakened after hundreds of thousand of years of imprisonment - he is powered by solar energy, the same as Superman. He was getting getting more powerful as the fight progressed. But even Doomsday at his lowest powerlevel not only in that arc but in history was capable of punching so hard that he was registering seismic activities all over the country.
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx28/PhilosophiaKMC/WeakenedDoomsdayGettingFree.jpg
I also love how you're using collateral damage as somehow proof of how impressive the fight is.
Ignoring the fact that it's an asinine standpoint, they didn't just "break some nearby glass".
The force of their blows shattered windows from Metropolis to Gotham. Buildings and homes shifted on their foundations.
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx28/PhilosophiaKMC/FightBlowsDestruction.jpg
Their final blows shook the planet to its core.
http://i738.photobucket.com/albums/xx28/PhilosophiaKMC/ShakingPlanetCore.jpg
Forum consesus? Wow, you sure brought down a whole world of arguments down on me.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Tell that to Batman.
😂
Amazing, again.
What does he have to do with, like I said, "The fact that top Green Lanterns are capable of amping to high-end levels that allow them to go up against the likes of Mongul and Cyborg Superman is. "?
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
The fact that the Singularity wasn't completely formed and that the feat itself is more an indication of durability/strength rather than any form of being powerful that he had?
The blackhole was not released because Superman caught it in his hand, the containment field was destroyed and no longer contained it. Thus why he was specifically mentioning the incredible pressure he's feeling, and why he and John made a magnetic field to contain it.
Strength and durability have nothing to do with how powerful a character is? Holding a black hole in your hand is not an impressive raw power feat? Thank you for sharing that.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
And had a hard time doing it and was obviously affected by it (via the scans). The Surfer did a whole lot better than he did.
He tanks it with his own durability, unlike Surfer, who has been shown to protect himself and be powered by blackholes. He was also taken by surprise, unlike Surfer who was aware what he was heading for. And speaking of which, Superman has also done better than Thanos against blackholes. Surfer more durable than Thanos? Superman more durable than Thanos? Random Green Lantern rookies more durable than Thanos?
I guess that makes a lot of sense in the no-penis-allowed silver world, right?
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
The fact that you present context-laden Deus Ex Machina "feats" as proof of Superman being more powerful and yet "laugh" when I mention the Crunch feat? :-/
Surfer taking a beating from Tenebrous and Aegis is valid, thus why I specifically countered it with better feats, both from Superman, aswell as various other characters like Thor and Surfer, who have gone up against beings that have Eternity analogues on the run, celestials and the likes of Spectre, stood up and kept fighting, unlike Surfer who was left for dead in a few blows.
What I specifically laughed at was you saying Surfer "survived something that killed abstracts", which reffers to the latter part of the crunch feat, where he redirected it twoards Tenebrous and Aegis.
Originally posted by D_Dude1210
Notice that the MARVEL character here actually had viable durability feat while the DC ones had one w/c was amped and the other that was completely based on an assumption? And yet, somehow you correlate them as identical feats in terms of viability?Funny how a DC fanboy's mind works.
Captain Marvel wasn't amped when he took on Spectre, but I'm not surprised that you have no ideea what you're talking about, again. Superman was not amped against Dominus, Quantum Mechanic or if we're going to go a step further, when he withstood energy attacks from Soulfire amped Darkseid and the Source, when he plowed through the weakness-based magical assault of Mordru and punched his teeth out, tanked attacks from the Entropy-Aegis armor (which is exactly what it sounds), tanked attacks from the Wizard Shazam in quick succesion and just waded through them, took multiple attacks from Kingdom Gog's staff trying to kill him (you know, the one that blows holes through 5th dimensional beings like Mxy) etc. Superman actually beats the characters who are at least skyfather in his universe (Darkseid for example - contrary to popular belief has feats to match any skyfather). He regulary takes on abstracts and wins.
Anyway, I'm bored. Spire has adressed some of your other idiocies, I've facepalmed at others, so it's my last words on this topic, as playing tennis with brick walls gets boring after a while.