Originally posted by Silent Master
He could have just been talking about losing blood faster than it can be replaced....at no point did he say that it takes more energy to replace blood.
Tell me, if his body is losing blood faster than it can be replaced, but it's still able to use it's repairing function, why would that be? Please, think about this. No, the line "blood takes more energy to replace than it does to reuse" is not used, but it can clearly be inferred from that scan. No other reading works. I'm operating on the assumption here that you really want us to prove this, but the way you keep denying the obvious is making me suspect that you're just wasting my time. Please stop.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Not going to play your little speculation game.Get back to me when it's actually stated on panel.
The only one playing games here is you with your ridiculous semantics.
"Energy" really isn't the issue here. What we know and what's important lay in two things.
1. That Wolverine's HF doesn't run on infinity.
and
2. That he'll drop if his heart has less blood to pump.
How do you lose blood? By bleeding it out.
Don't be so obtuse.
Originally posted by Silent Master
What we know is that the comic in question never stated Wolverine's healing factor was taxed. Therefore this whole tangent has just been an attempt to invalidate an example that the Wolverine side doesn't like.
What we know is that the previous issue, written by the same writer, had Wolverine taking MUCH more damage without being knocked out, than he took in the issue in question. Why would that be, unless his healing factor wasn't working as well? And please, use some critical thinking here - not everything is stated black and white, writers DO allow readers to come to obvious conclusions on their own - and when they don't, we justifiably accuse them of being verbose.
1. First example, it was taxed. Period.
2. Second example, it was getting taxed, hence the reference to "getting ripped bad, can't take much more"- As in he could take it at the start of the fight but it was getting harder to do.
Again, don't be so utterly foolish.
The comic doesn't need to directly state things that are absolutely presented to us.
Originally posted by Silent Master
After some of the things we have seen the HF deal with....I'm not buying the "it was taxed" excuse without something in the comic actually stating it.
In reference to the Mr. X fight. I REALLY shouldn't have to.
You can clearly see a large portion of what Wolverine went through earlier that night, they reference more attacks having taken place off panel as well.
And, the next fight Wolverine had with X, X was hitting him with everything he could muster and failing on an epic scale, took a suckerpunch from Ogun to stop him.
Now you're passing foolishness behind and opting for stupidity instead.
Originally posted by Silent Master
I'm not buying the "it was taxed" excuse without something in the comic actually stating it.
Well you're one of the morons who was convinced Thor was trying to talk sense into Wolverine when in reality he only said two words to Wolverine at the start of the fight....
Not really surprised.
Originally posted by Silent Master
Either prove the claim or withdraw it.
Honestly stop beign a child. One thing to disagree with his ability to take thor on in melee, but it quite another to pretend that him taking tons of damage from a small army did not factor into him fighting x.
Originally posted by Silent Master
I'm not buying the "taxed" healing factor excuse without some real proof.
The story context is your proof, ignore it and you're trolling. It's that simple.
"considering some of the things we've seen him heal from" Different writers, write characters differently. PIS may have been in effect, context has to play a part. You're not considering any of this because you want a panel narration to state "Flash was running really fast" when he's blurring around the planet. The narration doesn't need to state the obvious , the narration assumes a level of reading comprehension in the 'reader'.