Originally posted by alltoomany
no one would need to look in the rear view mirror if everyone follows the lawswe need order in our life without it we as a race would have died out already
Accidents can always still happen and plenty of those lawmakers are corrupt.
No argument on the second bit though...and thats where the police and military and government come in...not a most likely imaginary being in a most likely non existant next life.
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Accidents can always still happen and plenty of those lawmakers are corrupt.No argument on the second bit though...and thats where the police and military and government come in...not a most likely imaginary being in a most likely non existant next life.
yeah and jewish people believe when ur dead ur dead there is nothing after life...just follow the 613 laws in life and u'll b okay
Except for when a mass murderer from Austria come and kills you...
Ha. Indeed.
You can follow all the rules you like on the road of life, and then some other shitty driver wipes you out. 🙁
As Anton Chigur says in "No country for old men" "What good were your rules, if they bought you to this...?"
The only rule I go off of is my conscience.
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Except for when a mass murderer from Austria come and kills you...Ha. Indeed.
You can follow all the rules you like on the road of life, and then some other shitty driver wipes you out. 🙁As Anton Chigur says in "No country for old men" "What good were your rules, if they bought you to this...?"
The only rule I go off of is my conscience.
Re: show me some evidence, evidence, and evidence
Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
not to offend the sore religious peoplebut why is the concept of evidence so hard to understand?
any given site ANY someone says "evidence please" and people quote scriptures on & on. sigh... its a frustrating loop -_-its the equivalent of someone telling someone there is no hogwarts full of wizards & in response they start reading the dam spells 😆
why do you always ask for evidence? That is the confusing thing. What is the point of that?
this thread fails at life
I've lost several thousand neurons reading the past pages, and while the high is nice, if feels like my brain is trying to eject through my eyeballs in a way that prevents it from being subjected to any more of this...
all I'm saying is step your games up guys. At the risk of just baiting you guys, my advice: learn to use the phrase "I can't speak to your specific situation, but it is unconvincing to me because of X", not "no, that never happened to you".
Re: Re: show me some evidence, evidence, and evidence
Originally posted by truejediasking for evidence is confusing? hmm lets see...people claim there is a god without any evidence to support his existence maybe 😆
why do you always ask for evidence? That is the confusing thing. What is the point of that?
inimalistthis thread fails at lifeI've lost several thousand neurons reading the past pages, and while the high is nice, if feels like my brain is trying to eject through my eyeballs in a way that prevents it from being subjected to any more of this...all I'm saying is step your games up guys. At the risk of just baiting you guys, my advice: learn to use the phrase "I can't speak to your specific situation, but it is unconvincing to me because of X", not "no, that never happened to you".this threads says show me evidence its not my fault people would rather ask if caesar existed or if a blue pencil is green or people claiming their faith to be stronger than gravity... rather than present evidence
my advice: learn to use the phrase "I can't speak to your specific situation, but it is unconvincing to me because of X", not "no, that never happened to you".nobody ever said anything remotely like that WTF 😬
you must be referring to DDM post about saving his sisters life... he said he heard a voice & narrowed it down to three possibilities... hes crazy, schizophrenic , or it was god.... i never said that it didn't happen 😬 i and others asked why did he come up with three possibilities despite the hundreds there are 😬
and RJ pill experience... i did say he was either lying or leaving out crucial information only after he called me retarded...
do you believe he downed 300 pills & high amounts of alcohol without throwing up? i doubt it. not to mention RJ has trolled MVF so i doubt he wouldn't do the same here
Originally posted by inimalist
my advice: learn to use the phrase "I can't speak to your specific situation, but it is unconvincing to me because of X", not "no, that never happened to you".
Originally posted by 0mega Spawn
and RJ pill experience... i did say he was either lying or leaving out crucial information...
do you believe he downed 300 pills & high amounts of alcohol without throwing up? i doubt it.
Originally posted by Sadako of Girth
Sure. Accepted.I dont feel I have to disprove god, I feel its up to god to prove itself.
Or for it's defenders/claimants to.
Under the old "extraordinary claims.." rule.
So, you want God to prove itself. And how do you know he/she/it hasn't already?
The problem is that you expect scriptures to prove themselves, not God, as we have no definition of what God is beyond what you may have heard Christians, Muslims and Jews go on about.
You'll have to accept that Abrahamic religions have the right view of God, then proceed to seek proof from there.
Any serious attempt at proving God will concentrate on defining it first and having a general idea of what it may be, before seeking evidence.
Re: Re: show me some evidence, evidence, and evidence
Originally posted by truejediNo, he know we cannot provide evidence. He started this thread knowing there was no way we could do so.
why do you always ask for evidence? That is the confusing thing. What is the point of that?
Then we when we asked him to DISPROVE God's existence, he cries that he doesn't have to.
Then we provided our own individual reasons that we believe in God, and he cries bullshit. It's like he asks me why I don't like eating BBQ, and I tell him because it's too messy. He cries bullshit. See, I am sure sadako is unconvinced by the stories that DDM and I shared, but sadako at least behaved like a gentleman about it. He took what we said, acknowledged it, and politely questioned it.
Omega? "Nuh uh, that never happened!!! You're crazy!!!!"
Originally posted by lil bitchiness
So, you want God to prove itself. And how do you know he/she/it hasn't already?The problem is that you expect scriptures to prove themselves, not God, as we have no definition of what God is beyond what you may have heard Christians, Muslims and Jews go on about.
You'll have to accept that Abrahamic religions have the right view of God, then proceed to seek proof from there.
Any serious attempt at proving God will concentrate on defining it first and having a general idea of what it may be, before seeking evidence.
however, I think there is value in pointing out that once one does accept any traditional view of God that is "God is unknowable", the predictions and statements of fact associated with the religious views of God (so far as they can be tested) are almost unanimously false.
Obviously this doesn't say much about this amorphous God of the modern theist, but it does, imho at least, give a pretty strong perspective on the concept in general. If the only interpretation of God that humans have held that doesn't have evidence against it is the one that specifically says this evidence is impossible to obtain, I don't really think that speaks well about the probability of God existing.
DISPROVE God's existenceif i set out to prove something DOESN'T exist, what would i be looking for?
If the only interpretation of God that humans have held that doesn't have evidence against it is the one that specifically says this evidence is impossible to obtain, I don't really think that speaks well about the probability of God existing.