Originally posted by Bentley
Also, if you think nations become racially diverse without ever being conquered or invaded, you're very naive.
I don't think that and I clearly didn't say that. I just pointed out that there are examples of countries where a massive increase in racial diversity occurred without conquest being the direct cause of it.
Which is precisely my point, you cannot have Wakanda to act like "western country" because Wakanda it's not a western country. The concept of "fixing" the nation so it's behind the standards of what we consider a modern nation fails to grasp the whole point of Wakanda. Wakanda is like a fantasy "alternate world", if it's not "alternate", it has no business existing.
It's not about fixing it or making it western. It's just a reimagining just as making Camelot or Asgard racially diverse is a reimagining. Right, wrong, stupid? You will find people with all these opinions.
When they "reimagined" Battlestar Galactica they completely changed the concept of what the Cylons were, how they originated, and their relationship with humanity. They went from a conquering alien superpower to originating as slaves. They completely changed the characters including personality, gender, and ethnicity. The whole feel of the series totally changed. But many people think that by daring to do that they came up with something far better and more successful (of course many would also disagree).
All I'm really saying is it's about opinion not right or wrong. Wakanda is barely heard of compared to Asgard, Camelot, or BG, it's no more "sacred" or above changing than any of them. You will annoy some fans and please others, but if people can come up with a more interesting and popular version then so be it. Bring on Jet Li and Jason Statham.