Tha C-Master
Zitz! Rash! Pimple!
Originally posted by Newjak
Maybe not 90% and I think percent is a bad way to describe it.Let's jsut say if Superman and Thor were going all out.
Superman's speed dial would be at an 11 or 12.
Thor's would be at a 9.
Superman is obviously better but I think Thor can deal with it. Which has always been my stance.
Edit:
Ok I think I demonstrated the level of difference when I wrote my Superman vs Thor battle in the rain. When Superman was going full speed the rain stopped completely when Thor did it the rain became a slow slow crawl to demonstrate the difference I feel in their senses but that Thor could still react and comprehend Superman as an object.
Oh I think Thor can hang with them because of reflexes, I was just wondering where you would place his body speed, particularly in combat.
Originally posted by 753
but by definition they aren't superhumans just like you claim cassandra isn't by definitionyour arrogance is funny, I read all his tiles and have done so for a while
seryously, are you trying not to understand the point? it makes no ****ing difference if elektra capitain america and cassandra are defined as peak humans they can match or exceed logan's feats which is all that matters. wolverine's speed isnt beyond wat peak humans pull off ona regular basis in comics. even batman who is slower than cass and elektra can match logan's feats. cassie's blitzing feats are pretty much the best in the non-speedster class btw
scans? and why do you assume dodging a tank shell is more impressive? he's been arround a lot longer than she has. her blitzing is more frequent in relative terms and more consistent.
facepalm nobody is saying she isnt a peak human. were sayign logan has nothing that puts him beyond peak humans in the reaction speed departament.
yeah, you just cant understand what is in the pretty pictures and then talk out of your ass when half the forum shows you that peak humans can match or exceed all of logan's supposedly superhuman reaction feats.
This is what I am talking about.
With Spider-Man and Logan.... "Spider-Man may be stated to be faster, but Logan has "similar" feats".
But you can say the same thing about Batman, Robin, etc. What makes them slower than Logan? They have done "similar" feats as well. So the argument seems like a double standard. I'm sorry to say it.
Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
On paper, the difference between Clark and Thor is huge. In practice? I think JLA/Avengers illustrated what I'd expect for the most part. Just the way comics work I guess.
That also has to include crossovers "equalizing" the characters for a good show as well.