Originally posted by Omega Vision
Regarding the Batman debate, I think it's telling of the differences between how power works in Marvel vs in DC.Marvel compared to DC has generally more well defined tiers and less 'clutter', which is to say that unlike DC where you have your streets, a few metas, and then a shit ton of Heralds in Marvel you have some streets, lots of Metas, and some heralds.
But comics being comics we have lots of situations in DC where Streets come up against and do well against Heralds.
Doesn't matter how many times it happens street lvlers taking class 100 shots is PIS. To be quite honest though not sure anybody has really given feats that I consider to be PIS, but it does pretty much seem to me they like to cockstroke Batman and go overboard.
Originally posted by Omega Vision
Anyway, enough rambling. The point I hope I'm making here is that I'm not so sure we can just dismiss Batman's showings against people who SHOULD be way out of his tier simply because he's a 'normal' human when it's pretty clear that DC thinks fairly highly of the capabilities of 'normal' humans.Wait, why is it 'going overboard' to suggest Batman hits harder than Matt?
Don't think he suggested Bullseye specifically stated that, what do you think it fuels the idea that writers like to cockstroke Batman.