Originally posted by Blair Wind
Dating Lucy Lane, kissing Wonder Woman, pining for Lois Lane - Superman is now Peter Parker.
I dunno. It took Marvel's Satan to break up Peter's marriage to a super model. I think whatever image there is of him as a lovable loser is his own demeanor and self-deprecating personality. Clark has always been more of a bumbler socially, at least any time after the 70's.
Guys people are allowed to have different opinions either for against this feat and for or against Superman in general. People can remain civil through disagreements.
Philo, you were asked by a mod to stop being aggressive to other posters yet you have continued. I'm issuing you a warning next time I'm going to submit you to be temp banned since this isn't your first warning.
Originally posted by NewjakI'd like to know when my last warning was and how many do I have.
Philo, you were asked by a mod to stop being aggressive to other posters yet you have continued. I'm issuing you a warning next time I'm going to submit you to be temp banned since this isn't your first warning.
'Aggressiveness' isn't something that is prohibited on this forum. I'm not here to hold people's hands through arguments, and hoping they don't cry along the way. I'm not trolling. I'm not giving free insults. Not being 'nice' isn't within the rules as something you shouldn't do. Pr told me to stop. I did. This warning is freely given, so feel free to justify it.
If you have a problem with me calling Galan a liar, then that's your problem. Because he lied, and the quotes are there to show it. Don't hold me responsable for pointing out something he did.
Originally posted by PhilosophíaIf you would like to see your previous warnings go to your profile and look at them. They are near the bottom.
I'd like to know when my last warning was and how many do I have.'Aggressiveness' isn't something that is prohibited on this forum. I'm not here to hold people's hands through arguments, and hoping they don't cry along the way. I'm not trolling. I'm not giving free insults. Not being 'nice' isn't within the rules as something you shouldn't do. Pr told me to stop. I did. This warning is freely given, so feel free to justify it.
If you have a problem with me calling Galan a liar, then that's your problem. Because he lied, and the quotes are there to show it. Don't hold me responsable for pointing out something he did.
As for the rest, PR told you to stop, and you did not even wait an hour before going back at Galan. That is not stopping.
Originally posted by NewjakI can't see them like that. I'm not a mod.
If you would like to see your previous warnings go to your profile and look at them. They are near the bottom.As for the rest, PR told you to stop, and you did not even wait an hour before going back at Galan. That is not stopping.
Pr told me to stop being so 'aggressive'. That doesn't translate to "stop talking to Galan or you get a warning". The post following Pr's would have been my last on the matter, though, if Galan hadn't lied about his opinion, just to get on people's good side. So I called him on the lie.
That's not reason for me to get a warning and get threatened with a temp ban. And neither is being 'aggressive'.
I can be as aggressive as I want - it's not against the rules. The only reason I'd stop is because of respect for other posters (like Raoul).
The warning is not justified.
Originally posted by PhilosophíaI thought I remembered being able to see them even before I was a mod. If that is not the case sorry. I shall PM your previous warnings.
I can't see them like that. I'm not a mod.Pr told me to stop being so 'aggressive'. That doesn't translate to "stop talking to Galan or you get a warning". The post following Pr's would have been my last on the matter, though, if Galan hadn't lied about his opinion, just to get on people's good side. So I called him on the lie.
That's not reason for me to get a warning and get threatened with a temp ban. And neither is being 'aggressive'.
I can be as aggressive as I want - it's not against the rules. The only reason I'd stop is because of respect for other posters (like Raoul).
The warning is not justified.
It doesn't translate to stop talking to people but it does translate to you need to stop attacking them.
And yes you did attack Galan, I'm sure in your mind you were exposing some hypocrisy but that isn't what you were doing and not what you did. Galan wasn't lying about anything he was agreeing with another poster saying it reflected his own opinions, something I assume Galan knows better than you, then you tried to say he was a liar. You've been doing this for the better part of these last handful of pages.
So for attacking a poster without reason and for disobeying a mod you get a warning, and since this is in line with your previous warnings and particularly the actions I've seen from you myself I'll will submit to have you temp banned the next time I see you doing it.
Originally posted by NewjakThanks. I notice I haven't had a warning in about 2 years and a half. I guess an unjustifiable one now, and then one later is enough to get me banned. Go figure.
I thought I remembered being able to see them even before I was a mod. If that is not the case sorry. I shall PM your previous warnings.
Originally posted by NewjakHe said the exact opposite of what Blair said, and then turned around and said that he completly agrees with Blair. That's lying.
Galan wasn't lying about anything he was agreeing with another poster saying it reflected his own opinions
I have the quotes. I can post them again. And again, if you'd like.
Just because it's his opinion doesn't mean he can't lie about it.
This wasn't a face-to-face discussion, this is the internet. The quotes are right there.
Originally posted by NewjakIn line with my previous warnings from almost 3 years ago?. 😂
So for attacking a poster without reason and for disobeying a mod you get a warning, and since this is in line with your previous warnings and particularly the actions I've seen from you myself I'll will submit to have you temp banned the next time I see you doing it.
Your personal opinion on me is irrelevant. I know you hate me. But being in a position of power isn't a channel for that hate - you still have to abide by the rules.
As it is:
a). Raoul didn't tell me to stop interacting with Galan
b). I wouldn't have interacted either way, if he hadn't lied. Which is easily provable.
That's not reason for me to get warned. Period.
Originally posted by PhilosophíaI have seen your exchange and read the quotes, Galan wasn't lying, nor did he really change his stance.
Thanks. I notice I haven't had a warning in about 2 years and a half. I guess an unjustifiable one now, and then one later is enough to get me banned. Go figure.He said the exact opposite of what Blair said, and then turned around and said that he completly agrees with Blair. That's lying.
I have the quotes. I can post them again. And again, if you'd like.
Just because it's his opinion doesn't mean he can't lie about it.
This wasn't a face-to-face discussion, this is the internet. The quotes are right there.
In line with my previous warnings from almost 3 years ago?. 😂
Your personal opinion on me is irrelevant. I know you hate me. But being in a position of power isn't a channel for that hate - you still have to abide by the rules.
As it is:
a). Raoul didn't tell me to stop interacting with Galan
b). I wouldn't have interacted either way, if he hadn't lied. Which is easily provable.That's not reason for me to get warned. Period.
And I don't hate you Philo, I may not like you mostly cause of your actions. You need to stop attacking other people. You've been warned. I don't want to ban anyone or have anyone banned including you, but I will if I feel the need arises.
Originally posted by NewjakBlair explicitly said that he had no problem with the magnitude of the feat himself but with the context in which it happened:
I have seen your exchange and read the quotes, Galan wasn't lying, nor did he really change his stance.
Originally posted by Blair Wind
The same feat, the same numbers, used in a context that pushes the story forward rather than a workout session just to prove a point to readers would have worked IMO. .
Originally posted by Galan007
Because the feat itself is ridiculous, and Superman just so happened to be the guy who preformed said feat. C'mon, bench pressing the weight-equivalent of earth... For 5 straight days... While weaker than normal..? That is just stupid. Tbh, I think the 5 straight days, while weakened, part is what makes the feat so facepalm-worthy for me.
Originally posted by Galan007
The part that will be really funny is when a select few act like planet-lifting is Superman's baseline, and any time he displays less than planet-level feats, it's PIS. When (not if) that happens, you will see me e-laugh. Most enthusiastically.
Originally posted by Galan007
This mirrors my thoughts exactly.Well put. 👆
This isn't debatable.
Don't try defending Galan to justify your decision, because then you will both look bad.
------------
Originally posted by Newjak"May not like you?" Don't make me dig up posts of yours before you became a mod again. If there's anybody on this forum you hate, it's me.
And I don't hate you Philo, I may not like you mostly cause of your actions. You need to stop attacking other people. You've been warned. I don't want to ban anyone or have anyone banned including you, but I will if I feel the need arises.
I don't care about what you "feel". This forum is based on rules, rules on which you must base your decisions, not on your feelings (otherwise I'll be the first banned). You must have solid arguments behind your decisions, otherwise you're just a guy with a grudge that got into a position of authority.
This warning is unsubstantial. You bringing up warnings that I've had 2 and a half years ago and saying that I'm walking on thin ice just because I've just received another one doesn't even need words to characterize it.
Get your personal opinions out of this.
Originally posted by Blair Wind
Dating Lucy Lane, kissing Wonder Woman, pining for Lois Lane - Superman is now Peter Parker.
Originally posted by Digi
I dunno. It took Marvel's [b]Satan to break up Peter's marriage to a super model. I think whatever image there is of him as a lovable loser is his own demeanor and self-deprecating personality. Clark has always been more of a bumbler socially, at least any time after the 70's. [/B]
Dating Gwen Stacy, kissing Black Cat, and pining for Mary Jane.
It maybe didn't happen all at once like Clark is currently doing, but it has happened. I might also be confusing the 90s animated show with the comics, but whatever.
Originally posted by Zack FairThey're happening simultaneously - the JLA will even appear in a few issues.
Thats what I was thinking.
But Johns does his own thing -- I mean, reading Wonder Woman by Azzarello and how she appears in JLA it would seem as if they're not even the same character. Even Hal, which Johns writes both in GL and JLA is different in the titles.
Originally posted by Philosophía
They're happening simultaneously - the JLA will even appear in a few issues.But Johns does his own thing -- I mean, reading Wonder Woman by Azzarello and how she appears in JLA it would seem as if they're not even the same character. Even Hal, which Johns writes both in GL and JLA is different in the titles.
I'd thought that, but i was hoping it wasn't true.
Originally posted by -Pr-From what Johns described it, at least, is that in JLA, Hal for one doesn't have so much responsability being in a team of powerhouses, so he's more leaned back, jokes, immaturity and all of that.
I'd thought that, but i was hoping it wasn't true.
Which is kind of 'realistic' [I hate that word, though], in the sense that people are that way most of the time, too.
Originally posted by Philosophía
From what Johns described it, at least, is that in JLA, Hal for one doesn't have so much responsability being in a team of powerhouses, so he's more leaned back, jokes, immaturity and all of that.Which is kind of 'realistic' [I hate that word, though], in the sense that people are that way most of the time, too.
Was talking more about Superman and Diana, but yeah that makes sense I suppose.