Originally posted by Philosophía
By being a whiny little b*tch,
Have I not provided reasoning for my gripes? If you're not complaining simply for the sake of complaining, is it wrong to do so? This is clearly too harsh an assessment. This is where we come to talk comics, good and bad. If I happen to have a lot more bad to say than good about something, it makes it no less valid, and not "whiny" in the derogatory sense you're using it here.
I'm angry at DC's direction, and want to talk about it. There should be no reason why I can't do that without being called names that KMC doesn't allow without special characters.
Originally posted by Philosophía
and then accusing other of being on the company's payroll when they are positive?
I didn't see any reason why he wasn't just blanketing everything in excitement. The particular payroll comment may have been too far, but if a person was universally excited about every aspect of something this large, it's clear that they aren't really being discerning.
As it is, I didn't think that was the case with Prep-Man, and it wasn't. His last post was an acknowledgment that, ok, there's some not-as-good with the good. Obviously he's got a much brighter outlook on the changes as a whole, I was just fishing for evidence of some critical observation, not simply blind acceptance.
Other people routinely get called out for their lopsided love/hate of a particular company, because it denotes a bias that slants their opinions. It can happen with individual characters too (thus, "fanboys"😉. I sometimes take issue with the way in which they're called out, but acknowledging it and pointing it out as a source of bias is part of debate and shouldn't be ignored.
Originally posted by -Pr-
Superman's been treated like shit for the last two/three years.
lul, fair enough.