Sebastian Shaw (movie) vs Thor (movie)

Started by Tazer16 pages

Yo.

I wouldnt say he displayed "da mad skillz" (he wasnt as impressive as Mystique looked in X1), but he certainly looked like he could handle himself in almost any scrap that came his way........

Tazer

There is a rare thing when a comic book character is more powerful in a movie than in comics. That goes for Shaw. I don't know if that's the case for any other comic book character in a movie. Spider-Man is good and could compare or rival his comic book counter part. But Shaw is actually more powerful than in comics.
Shaw was absorbing nuclear reactor and he didn't look to be overloaded anytime soon. Probably even comic Magneto could have some trouble with movie Shaw.
Shaw was a beast in the movie and he wins this.

😂 at using Thor beats some random shield chumps as proof of skill(the agents never showed ANY skill at all), and all Thor did against the gaints was throw haymakers. Shaw would annihilate both

Thor never showed a limit to his strength just like Shaw never showed a limit to his absorption. So it's a stalemate.

Originally posted by Nihilist
😂 at using Thor beats some random shield chumps as proof of skill(the agents never showed ANY skill at all), and all Thor did against the gaints was throw haymakers. Shaw would annihilate both

What the hell do you want, some kind of montage showing the Agent training?

Thor apparently defeated some of the most highly trained men in the world. He was incredibly effective at hand to hand combat. That was obviously what the creators were trying to portray.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Thor never showed a limit to his strength just like Shaw never showed a limit to his absorption. So it's a stalemate.

That wouldn't be a stalemate.

He'd have had to show no limit to his invulnerability.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Thor never showed a limit to his strength just like Shaw never showed a limit to his absorption. So it's a stalemate.

You wish.

Originally posted by Mindset
That wouldn't be a stalemate.

He'd have had to show no limit to his invulnerability.

We never saw Thor get put down by anything so clearly his ability to soak up damage is unlimited. That goes without saying.

😂 at using Thor beats some random shield chumps as proof of skill(the agents never showed ANY skill at all), and all Thor did against the gaints was throw haymakers. Shaw would annihilate both

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
We never saw Thor get put down by anything so clearly his ability to soak up damage is unlimited. That goes without saying.
I saw him get hurt.

You must have seen a different movie.

Originally posted by Nihilist
😂 at using Thor beats some random shield chumps as proof of skill(the agents never showed ANY skill at all), and all Thor did against the gaints was throw haymakers. Shaw would annihilate both

Be stupid about it if you want. I thought it was obvious that Thor was intended to be skilled in hand to hand. There's a reason why they took so much time trying to develop a fighting style for Thor. He's supposed to be a brawler, but at the same time, highly effective.

That was the entire point, Thor was so skilled that he made them look like chumps...or did you miss the part of the movie where this was stated?

Originally posted by Mindset
I saw him get hurt.

You must have seen a different movie.

When did Thor get put down?

Movie Shaw is just too much for movie Thor.

Apparently not.

IIRC, Thor (with powers, obviously) was only really injured by Loki w/Gungnir. And Loki completely disintegrated Laufey with it.

Unless I'm missing something.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
IIRC, Thor was only really injured by Loki w/Gungnir. And Loki completely disintegrated Laufey with it.

And what does that mean to Shaw? It only means that Shaw is also far too much for Laufey and Loki. 🙂

Originally posted by Xplosive
And what does that mean to Shaw? It only means that Shaw is also far too much for Laufey and Loki.

I was responding to the claim of Thor being hurt.

Based on what?

Originally posted by Xplosive
And what does that mean to Shaw? It only means that Shaw is also far too much for Laufey and Loki. 🙂

Loki would waste Shaw.

Originally posted by Rage.Of.Olympus
Thor never showed a limit to his strength just like Shaw never showed a limit to his absorption. So it's a stalemate.
I'm still waiting for the day when you'll actually make any kind of sense.

You should start saying "Superman wins" every now and then, even if you don't think so. That way you'll fake intelligence.

Originally posted by JakeTheBank
I was responding to the claim of Thor being hurt.

Based on what?

Based on Shaw showing to have far more power within than anything Thor or Loki showed or displayed in the movie.