James Howlett vs. Eric Brooks

Originally posted by OneDumbG0
Yet, in comics, it's enough. And that minute amount of iron is enough for Magneto and other ferrokinetics to seize upon. Biologically correct? No. Comic book fact? Yes. What a pathetically blatant mischaracterization. It ain't PIS when it's so entrenched with clear on-panel proof. Stop pretending like you have a wealth of clear on-panel evidence that proves there are no gaps. You don't. Not at all. Don't make me laugh out loud anymore.

In comic books, skulls contain orifices wide enough to permit clear paths to the brain. That's how it works in comics. Biologically correct? No. Comic book fact? Definitely. How do we know this? Wealth of uncontradicted, clear, non-circumstantial on-panel evidence.

It is phucking brutal to watch you plead otherwise. The debate was a farce this entire time. I now understand it could happen a dozen more times and you still won't accept it. But your non-sensical recalcitrance doesn't suffice as an argument. And I don't need your admission. It's worthless. As worthless as all your arguments to the contrary have been.

You starting to get mad bro? lolz

You claim that you have a "wealth of uncontradicted, clear, non-circumstantial on-panel evidence." That is laughable. All you have is circumstantial ("But Rogue said..." "But random hunter said..."😉 and contradicted (everything else) "evidence. " You don't have a leg to stand on champ. You cite a few isolated examples, most of which don't have anything to do with one another and all of which have been invalidated and over ruled by the examples supplied as opposition. I understand it is frustrating for you to have no real argument, but you've been carrying about this for years now. Even I'm starting to feel pity and embarrassment for you now. It's really quite sad, I think it's time for you to move one now. Maybe you should try Comicvine?

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
You starting to get mad bro? lolz

You claim that you have a "wealth of uncontradicted, clear, non-circumstantial on-panel evidence." That is laughable. All you have is circumstantial ("But Rogue said..." "But random hunter said..."😉 and contradicted (everything else) "evidence. " You don't have a leg to stand on champ. You cite a few isolated examples, most of which don't have anything to do with one another and all of which have been invalidated and over ruled by the examples supplied as opposition. I understand it is frustrating for you to have no real argument, but you've been carrying about this for years now. Even I'm starting to feel pity and embarrassment for you now. It's really quite sad, I think it's time for you to move one now. Maybe you should try Comicvine?

Also funny that he states his evidence is "non circumstancial" while at the same time professing that urs is. Depsite the fact his is based off the notion Wolverien head looks like a jigsaw puzzle, despite the fact it never once been represented as such. Not to mention the fact there more evidence against the notion he trying to pass off, then for it.

He would have been better off simply trying to argue the eye incident, instead of stooping even lower and trying to pass off completely unrelated incidents, such as through the ear, nose and jaw as if they some how support his myth. But thats to be expected by someone who main arguement for MN winning is that he "spit an eye into Wolverine head through his eye socket for the majority"laughable

I promise 1 of 2 things will happen. This nonsense will stop or at least 2 people will be warned and possibly temp banned.

Originally posted by Badabing
I promise 1 of 2 things will happen. This nonsense will stop or at least 2 people will be warned and possibly temp banned.

I'm curious, do you feel the discussion is off topic? Because whether or not shooting Wolverine in the eye is a valid tactic seems like it is relevant to the discussion at hand. Or do you feel to discussion has been extremely uncordial?

You know could provide a mod ruling on the phantom bone theory, because we've been asking for one for like three years. That would end this discussion and prevent any potential future ones 😎

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I'm curious, do you feel the discussion is off topic? Because whether or not shooting Wolverine in the eye is a valid tactic seems like it is relevant to the discussion at hand. Or do you feel to discussion has been extremely uncordial?

You know could provide a mod ruling on the phantom bone theory, because we've been asking for one for like three years. 😎

Make a Battlezone for this and everyone provides the evidence and/or counter evidence he has.

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I'm curious, do you feel the discussion is off topic? Because whether or not shooting Wolverine in the eye is a valid tactic seems like it is relevant to the discussion at hand. Or do you feel to discussion has been extremely uncordial?

You know could provide a mod ruling on the phantom bone theory, because we've been asking for one for like three years. That would end this discussion and prevent any potential future ones 😎

Originally posted by Parmaniac
Make a Battlezone for this and everyone provides the evidence and/or counter evidence he has.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
Make a Battlezone for this and everyone provides the evidence and/or counter evidence he has.

Can I pick the judges? 😈

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
Can I pick the judges? 😈

Originally posted by Badabing
This is the best option.

If srankmissingnin wants, he can PM me and we can establish (i) the issue to be debated, (ii) when we do it, and (iii) the judges to be chosen. The ball's in his court. Beyond that, I'll not derail this thread any further with this.

Originally posted by Parmaniac
How about you pick 1 or 2, Onedumb picks 1 or 2 and Bada is or picks the last one?

I'll pick two people likely to vote my way, Dumb will do the same, and the person Bada picks will be the only person that matters... which is pretty much a mod ruling by proxy. Seems kinda pointless, why not take the proxy out of the equation and just get a mod ruling? /shrug

I'd be up for a Battlezone if I have to, but I don't feel like it makes a whole lot of sense in the long run. Aren't persistent arguments and misconceptions like this the whole reason PR and Bada made the Character Ruling Thread?

Originally posted by srankmissingnin
I'll pick two people likely to vote my way, Dumb will do the same, and the person Bada picks will be the only person that matters... which is pretty much a mod ruling by proxy. Seems kinda pointless, why not take the proxy out of the equation and just get a mod ruling? /shrug

Well...um... shut up sneer

Bada sent me a PM and chose me as one of the voters. START IT UP.

I'm going to assume the battlezone is only for the bone discussion and not the thread entirely, so let's move on.

Working on the assumption that Blade is faster than Wolverine, does the Wolverine side have feats that show him doing well in combat against Speedsters who hang with Spitfire or are faster?

He dodged Living Lightning, tagged Speed Demon (more of a skill feat but whatever), battled Gorgon...

Originally posted by StiltmanFTW
He dodged Living Lightning, tagged Speed Demon (more of a skill feat but whatever), battled Gorgon...

Are those under his Speed feats or Battles section?

Originally posted by Mr.Mxyzptlk
Are those under his Speed feats or Battles section?

SD one is, LL is lost somewhere in that thread and the battle with Gorgon is in his own respect thread, gimme a sec and I'll copy the links.

(4 - speed of sound)

Gorgon isn't what i would call a "speedster" and he still kicked Wolverine's ass.

I'd like to point out his (Wolverine's) Blitz in Sex & Violence though.