Originally posted by leonidas
the 'trap in the board' attack was interesting. maybe becasue genis was so new he couldn't counter it? not sure. with obliterator, all he transmuted was his weapons, no?again, your suggestions seem logically possible, like delph's do, but it's hard for me (and many others) to credit these types of attacks fully for a couple reasons. one, because he really hasn't demonstrated them against someone at hulk's level--lunatik aside. and to counter that, there IS some evidence that hulk might be able to resist that style attack. the other reason has to do with the ad infinitum nature of acceptance. if we allow that he can simply transmute hulk, then where do we draw the line? can he transmute thor? morg? glads? superman? if you say no, why not? can he transmute trans level guys? why not? do THEY have resistance feats? if they don't, can we assume he CAN do so?
allowing that he can do as you suggest without outright, specific proof, just opens a large can of worms that not too many are comfortable opening.
It is a problem -- much like the speed-force, or telepathy. At what point does one assume that characters have resistance to telepathic attacks? I started a thread a while ago that asked that question. If we see a character knock out Thor or Hyperion with a single punch, but show no abilities aside from strength and durability, is it safe to assume that the weakest telepath could mindrape them? My personal feeling is no, but I am also one of the zoom naysayers. With matter manipulation, many of the top-tiers have feats going either way, and as with telepathy, sometimes there are crazy things like people resisting manipulation through will-power (both Doom and Kang have done this). To my mind, the ideal solution is not to overpower one character by giving their abilities a free pass (for instance, I actually do not support board-imprisonment or shrinkage as on-forum strategies, though I may sometimes pretend otherwise to annoy certain people), nor to deny a character an entire aspect of their powerset on inconclusive evidence (for instance, saying that a certain character automatically resists a certain kind of attack based when they have an inconsistent record of resisting those kinds of attacks), but to take account of the ability as a strong influencing factor. For instance, Manchester Black messed up superman pretty bad by telekinetically manipulating capillaries in his brain, but the attack ultimately failed -- in considering a match between superman and a being with similar TK abilities, rather than saying that Mr. TK gets an automatic win through aneurysm, or that Superman just shrugs off the attack, we can go for a middle ground in which TK is an influencing, but not necessarily deciding factor. In the case of Surfer vs. Hulk, I see matter and gamma-manipulation as powerful tools at his disposal, that at this point might not give him an automatic win, but which will definitely put the fight in his favor. I don't think that this is an especially crazy stance.