Originally posted by Nephthys
You should be sorry.my poor feelings..... 🙁
I know its a normal sword. But I don't see how the above helped it to cut off Saurons fingers. Being able to stay sharp for a really long time isn't important in that respect.
If I'm not mistaken, you're asserting that its only because of its magical properties that it was able to cut off Saurons fingers, so Snapes magic won't be up to the task (lolwut). I however see nothing about the sword that leads me to think that a non-magical one would have been unable to cut his fingers off just the same. If you do think so, please provide proof for that line of reasoning.
Plus the sword was snapped by Sauron stomping on it. Meh.
Actually I think it was because only Isildur's Heir could use that sword to command the Armies of the Dead. It would have been pointless to give it to, say, Theoden. He couldn't have used it to do what Aragorn did with it.
Can I take this as a concession that you lack the feats required to continue your assertion? Because I agree. Narsil properties were not expanded upon adequetely for that.
Snape has 'Sectumsempra', a spell that slashes the enemy like a blade. Only Snape can use it for 50 feet away.
😉
I'm sorreh! D=
Eh, i'm trying to...convey that the reason Sauron stepped on it was because it was one of the few things that could harm him so easily. Not that was capable. For example, do i think if someone shot him with an arrow he's be as hurt (size ratio wise) as anyone else? No, I really don't.
I just can't follow the line of reasoning.
Sauron deliberately steps on it
The Elven Lord regards it very highly
It's edge has not dulled in thousands of years
Aragorn refuses it's 'power'
I cannot follow any logic that would call it the same as the sword he was using previously save for the deal with the dead. It's just foreign to me.
Snape was never shown to use that ability 😖hifty:
And in the instance Harry used it he was about... what... 20 feet away. Where did 50 come from?