Originally posted by Sadako of GirthZan would save you from a dragon so show the fictional man some respect.
Not likely. Odds are way against Vag Zan.
Originally posted by the ninjakQuinn's physique is awesome to call him malnourished is silly.
I don't think anybody has stated that Zan was malnorished. Just pretty much everybody else in the film. Including Quinn.
Originally posted by RobtardZan was winning while McClane was losing until she turned around. Facts. I guess losing to a woman until her attention is lost is a highlight in your eyes.
That was a woman not in the fight saying it and you're still ignoring that at the rate Van Zan was damaging Quinn with his cream-puff punches, Van Zan would have needed hours or days to kill Quinn. Actual-feats > some nonsense that someone said in passing. So keep Vanboying, it's all you have.WTF? He flat-out survives. Correct, it's some neutral street and Van Zan is a lesser opponent than McClane has faced before with just about zero fighting-feats of worth under his 0-0-1 fight record, ergo McClane wins.
Originally posted by Lestov16It was the manner in how easily she disarmed and beat him. He had the advantage and not only lost it easily but also got dominated in hand to hand combat till she turned away to walk away from him. He attacked her from behind like a true coward.
So if a woman fights and kicks ass, it doesn't count because she has 2 X chromosomes and is thus clearly the inferior gender, to the point of being a humiliation if she actually wins, but if a woman makes an offhand remark thata) She has no expertise in
b) contradicted the clear physical effects as, based off of the damage Quinn sustained, would NOT have killed him had the fight continuedthen all of a sudden, her word is irrefutable gospel?
I smell a dandy of a contradiction here.......